Absolutely, members have the right to question policy. However, it's obvious the OP didn't read the FAQ on this topic, or they wouldn't have made the erroneous assumptions they made. It isn't "flaming" to direct them to the established procedure for dealing with such ads.
Site visitors who aren't forum members tend to click "Contact Info" on the home page, which directs them to the Contact form for comments and questions.And why would the FIRST place I think to look for questions about MacRumors be on the Forum site? I was having issues with the ads on MacRumors not MacRumors Forums. The first and most logical place for anyone to look would be on MR, not the forums. How would you expect visitors to report ads on MR if they were not Forum members?
What do I do about annoying ads?
MacRumors uses an advertising service that supplies ads from a pool. We do not select the specific ads shown or the specific advertisers who participate.
If you find a particular ad especially annoying (e.g., an ad that is oversized, obscures the page, moves around, or has sound), let us know by posting a screenshot in our Site and Forum Feedback forum and telling us the URL it links to. Using this information we can ask to have it removed from the ad pool.
So, from what I can tell, aside from not posting the screenshot and providing the URL (and making the thread title more descriptive), I apparently was doing exactly what MR recommends. From all the comments, it appeared that there was some special email address to notify the folks here, and that posting about it here on this forum was a big social faux pas. Unless I'm missing something...
Yes, what you're missing is that if you had read and followed the FAQ to begin with, your thread title would have been as I suggested, alerting mods to the presence of an annoying ad and giving details so they could remove it, rather than threatening to leave the site and making accusations about MR leadership: "Hopefully MacRumors will come to its senses and remove these invasive ads and show its users they care about usability." You weren't criticized for starting a thread, but for not following the established procedure for reporting such ads. No one said anything about a "special email address" or that posting a thread about an ad was a "big social faux pas." As arn said, "All you need to do is ask."Okay. Wow.
I went to the FAQ, just as many here have admonished me for not doing to follow "proper procedure" to alert MR about this latest ad, and what do I find?
So, from what I can tell, aside from not posting the screenshot and providing the URL (and making the thread title more descriptive), I apparently was doing exactly what MR recommends. From all the comments, it appeared that there was some special email address to notify the folks here, and that posting about it here on this forum was a big social faux pas. Unless I'm missing something...
Okay. Wow.
I went to the FAQ, just as many here have admonished me for not doing to follow "proper procedure" to alert MR about this latest ad, and what do I find?
Emphasis mine.
So, from what I can tell, aside from not posting the screenshot and providing the URL (and making the thread title more descriptive), I apparently was doing exactly what MR recommends. From all the comments, it appeared that there was some special email address to notify the folks here, and that posting about it here on this forum was a big social faux pas. Unless I'm missing something...
Somehow I have the feeling that I'm about to say something stupid, since all of you guys are more technologically sophisticated than I am.