Anyone hoping a new version of bootcamp support this OS in the future![]()
I don't think so, because Apple is only putting windows on there OS for software because not a lot of software is made for OS X
Anyone hoping a new version of bootcamp support this OS in the future![]()
Net Applications measure browser statistics not OS share, and they only survey a very limited set of sites.
Service Packs rarely include new OS features and interface redesign. For some reason XP SP2 is taken as the standard rather than the exception.
To say Windows 7 is a service pack is just blinkered and ignorant.
"[Windows 7], it's Windows Vista, a lot better,"
Ballmer
Of course the problems piled up, if third parties couldn't be bothered to write proper drivers, if programmers hadn't updated their software properly.I recall during Vista's beta there was nothing but praise for it. It was after mass adoption when the problems start to pile up.
Are they? Hmmm. I haven't looked at recent numbers but the US was always trailing behind Japan and western Europe quite a bit (in 2007, the US was in the 24th spot). Up until 2005, Sweden was the world leader in internet penetration, broadband in particular, but very very very far from the leader in Mac market share.Net share counts unique visits, not every visit... And the 90% stat is international, not regional, but it's true that US citizens tend to be more active on the net...
Were they ever associated with quality? I've heard people whine about the p*ss poor quality of Windows for nearly 20 years now, yet a crushing majority still use it. Win7 is the first version since Win2K I would call a quality product. It's all of Vista's pros with none of its cons except the plethora of editions and the overconfident pricing, but neither affects the user experience.*LTD* said:Microsoft is no longer associated with Quality. THAT is the biggest loss a company could incur. Every ad they put out, every response to critics, simply reinforces that image.
I don't think so, because Apple is only putting windows on there OS for software because not a lot of software is made for OS X
I don't, but that doesn't make their statistics any more accurate or acceptable. You even claimed they are international statistics, most of their sites are American.Hey, if you've got another trusted way of measuring OS share of computers "in use" I'm open to suggestions.
Of course the problems piled up, if third parties couldn't be bothered to write proper drivers, if programmers hadn't updated their software properly.
Of course the problems piled up, if third parties couldn't be bothered to write proper drivers, if programmers hadn't updated their software properly.
I don't think so, because Apple is only putting windows on there OS for software because not a lot of software is made for OS X
I don't think so, because Apple is only putting windows on there OS for software because not a lot of software is made for OS X
Or maybe backwards-compatible support for drivers?
Phasing out of old versions of things?—I remember running Classic apps from OS 9 on 10.3... 5 years into OS X...
Or just better structure/organizing/paradigms?
(any of the above, if implemented, would really help during it's adoption period...)
I don't think so, because Apple is only putting windows on there OS for software because not a lot of software is made for OS X
Good song
![]()
Not quite better than The Number of the Beast.
(UP THE IRONS from Ontario Canada.)
I don't, but that doesn't make their statistics any more accurate or acceptable. You even claimed they are international statistics, most of their sites are American.
Firstly let me remark that Snow Leopard has an updated kernel for full 64bit support. Vista and 7 uses very much the same. The things rewritten in 7, such as explorer, is also rewritten in Snow Leopard, ie. the Finder.And I suppose Balmer saying Windows 7 is Vista but better is in no way comparable to Snow Leopard and Leopard?
Well, Google is an American site, that doesn't stop people from other countries from using it...
Just because the sites are American doesn't mean there might be less people from other countries. But yes, in general the US population is more active internet-wise,... And there will always be bias—the internet a creation of humanity, after all.
(I'm from Hong Kong, and I still visit American sites regularly.)
Firstly let me remark that Snow Leopard has an updated kernel for full 64bit support. Vista and 7 uses very much the same. The things rewritten in 7, such as explorer, is also rewritten in Snow Leopard, ie. the Finder.
Second, yes Snow Leopard is just a minor update—that's why it's offered at a discounted price... $29 vs the usual $129...
(And Apple doesn't really need much to fix it's image after Leopard—Leopard was a PR success, after all. Vista is the disaster, and 7 needs to be seen as the "free fix" offered or else Microsoft's image will continue to deteriorate...)
Jesus how can you compare Apple's situation to Microsoft's? Apple covers a tiny fraction of software and hardware.
Yep, UP THE IRONS! The best metal band in the world, hands down. In fact, the whole album is a masterpiece...especially after they replaced Gangland with Total Eclipse...![]()
Well if there's another software/like company out there that makes operating systems that I can use to compare with Microsoft-like market share, let me know.
I mean come on, If they can sell out every single show on their Flight 666 then, come on!
Google is a search engine, the Net Applications sites if I remember were sports sites and news sites. A far smaller proportion of international users will visit those sites than will use a search engine
Which means that the cost of upgrading really needs to be justified (i.e. cannot rely on good experiences/word-on-the-street/PR of the past).and when the cost os $0, then it's easily justifiable.And thats all Vista was, a PR failure. As an OS it's stable and useable and is still on more machines than XP. Its only the perception of Vista as a failure that has to be addressed.
There isn't, so don't bother to compare apples with oranges.