Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
While we should not panic, it's also very dangerous to downplay the effects of this virus. Many more people will catch it if these global events were to go on. So while we should not panic, we should take necessary and obvious precautions. 2% of a lot of people is still a lot of people.
Again, 2% will not hold up as the denominator rises. This isn’t killing young people or healthy people at anywhere near that rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardfan
I work in a field that requires booking our large venues -

You need to cancel far ahead of time if you want to recoup any of your costs. Canceling even this close they are unlikely to get back the costs from the main venue but, there are thousands of rooms in things like hotel blocks, catering contracts, construction firms, etc.

Interesting. Microsoft and Google events we were going to was just cancelled. each had booked over 1,000 people into 2 or 3 hotels. I assumed they would get their money back. Maybe not?

But perhaps since each the books 10,000s of rooms a year with these places they have a large hammer.
 
Again, 2% will not hold up as the denominator rises. This isn’t killing young people or healthy people at anywhere near that rate.

Even 2% of people over 60 is a big number and would have a large effect on businesses since these people have a lot of money to spend.
 
Last edited:
The most respected doctor in viruses said that, not me. It also makes sense.

It's pretty obvious one would think. Many with minor symptoms would never get tested for this or didn't even have that option. Heck, they probably wouldn't even see a doctor about it as it's simply like having a bad cold. And so the denominator will always be much lower than it should be.

It's basically the flu. Much ado about nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
The most respected doctor in viruses said that, not me. It also makes sense.
Doctors are not statisticians. Medical error fatalities due to bad statistical judgements of risks are way too common.

Globally the annual death toll from car crashes is 1.25 million. There are so many other things that can kill us in far greater numbers. Chill people.

Another rookie statistical error (often fatal). The variance of the auto fatality rate is quite known. A +2 sigma year doesn't double that auto accident rate from the previous year. We have enough hospitals to handle the current auto accident rates. But a 2+ sigma event in a new pandemic can easily increase the effect rate by orders of magnitude.

3000 people have died worldwide so far from Coronavirus (first case, December 2019)
Seasonal flu kills 291,000 to 646,000 people worldwide each year, according to a new estimate that's higher than the previous one of 250,000 to 500,000 deaths a year. (Source: MedicineNet)
But I do not see any events or travel being canceled due to the risk of catching the flu? Hmmm! I wonder why that may be??
Yes, it is bad and something we should worry about, sure. Has it been blown out of proportions? I certainly think so.

Same mistake. You have just reported the known variation in seasonal flu fatality rate. But pandemics have a much wider variance. Or maybe a completely unknown variance. Completely different things.

We actually don’t know that.

And that's the most intelligent statement of all.
 
Last edited:
Who was that?
Fauci.

China Study Puts Coronavirus Death Rate at 1.4%; Real Number May Be Lower
That's much higher than the rate seen with the seasonal flu, where only about 0.1% of cases end in death. But it's far below the mortality rate of recent coronavirus outbreaks like SARS (9 to 10%) or MERS (36%), noted Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Furthermore, the 1.4% figure cited in the new Chinese report, published Feb. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine, is probably higher than the "real" death rate, Fauci added.

That's because many coronavirus cases are so mild they're not even being reported, Fauci explained in an editorial he co-wrote in the same issue of the NEJM. Co-authors include Dr. Robert Redfield, who directs the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Clifford Lane, deputy director of the NIAID.

"If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%," Fauci and his colleagues explained.

"This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately
be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza pandemic [which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%] or a pandemic influenza [similar to those in 1957 and 1968]," the experts wrote.
 
You can greatly reduce your risk of dying in car crashes by using a seatbelt, driving carefully, obeying driving laws, and driving less.

Can’t do much about this virus.
That's quite a sweeping statement to make. Give us stats or anything from a reputable source to back up that this is not serious.
Australia has had 1 confirmed death from a population for 25 million, believe it or not, people are clearing out the shelves of tolet paper... the public have lot their mind over this. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...w/news-story/53de5794a49274c44558651d6712df71
 
All these ‘Covid19 has only killed x people‘ type of responses show a profound misunderstanding of growth rates. Spanish Flu only killed one person on the entire planet - at the point when the first ever casualty of the virus died - but from there the number of deaths grew.

I’m not an epidemiologist so right now the best way that I can inform myself is by listening to the opinions of experts in the field and at least the ones that I am seeing interviewed tend to be cautious with their words- emphasising that worst case scenarios are just that, worst case, and might never happen (indeed some experts I have heard say “should never happen” provided that effective early interventions are taken) but I do detect an underlying current of genuine concern from pretty much all of the experts that I’ve seen interviewed so I will go with their expertise rather than “it’s no big deal, car crashes kill more people” sorts of comments.
 
Last edited:
Why not just cancel every event this year?!

It might as well end up like this. Here in Switzerland, events with more than 1000 people are currently forbidden, events with more than 150 people need approval by the local government. These measures are in place until March 15th currently, but I could image they will stay in place much much longer.
 
It might as well end up like this. Here in Switzerland, events with more than 1000 people are currently forbidden, events with more than 150 people need approval by the local government. These measures are in place until March 15th currently, but I could image they will stay in place much much longer.

They should also cancel the Euro 2020 and the Summer Olympics this year
 
They should also cancel the Euro 2020 and the Summer Olympics this year

I don't think it is going to happen. People all around the world watch those events on TV, just play the games in empty stadiums. Athletes and trainers are only a few thousands, they can be monitored and they need to stay in the olympic village for the entire time to avoid contacts with sick people outside.
 
I don't think it is going to happen. People all around the world watch those events on TV, just play the games in empty stadiums. Athletes and trainers are only a few thousands, they can be monitored and they need to stay in the olympic village for the entire time to avoid contacts with sick people outside.

I don’t think any of the professional athletes would be willing to perform in an empty stadium, it’s better to cancel it all together no matter how big the occasion or the event.
 
I don’t think any of the professional athletes would be willing to perform in an empty stadium, it’s better to cancel it all together no matter how big the occasion or the event.

Attending an Olympics for some athletes is once in a life time achievement. If they postpone it for a few weeks I think they'll be happy, if they cancel the event I bet most of the athletes would rather have empty stadiums than missing the opportunity. They train for months, if not years, for the event.
Football is different, players are professional and work for a team during the year so even if Euro 2020 is postponed to next year it wouldn't make a huge difference. Here in Italy they are going to play in empty stadiums for a few weeks, they say is different but they don't refuse to play.
 
Why should Disney close with no cases reported?

What do you mean by that? No cases where? In Disney parks themselves? Because there are several cases in the same Orange county that Disneyland is in. And I know there are now cases in Florida too. And while not enough cases to close a theme park yet (thankfully since my husband works in one), if things were to get worse that could happen. Disney parks in China have been closed for 3 or 4 weeks. In Japan, one week.
 
Falling numbers???

The renowned newspaper NZZ writes today:
... But the true extent of the epidemic in China seems unclear, because the way the number of detected infections is counted has been changed several times, which has had a noticeable effect on official statistics. As the Chinese magazine "Caixin" reported, since the beginning of February, for example, persons who are demonstrably infected but show no symptoms of the disease can no longer be counted as newly confirmed infections, but listed elsewhere. Such persons can also be contagious...

The metric has primarily changed twice, once because the number and speed of nucleic acid tests couldn’t keep up in Hubei so they switched to clinical diagnosis with CT scans for lung infections without checking for the existence of the virus (this counted all patients with signs of pneumonia), the second time the criteria was switched back to nucleic acid tests as number of cases became more manageable. Asymptomatic patients are not very common and most eventually develop symptoms and added to the main listings. Regardless, all of the metrics has been showing signs of significant decrease from the height of infections in early February.
 
What do you mean by that? No cases where? In Disney parks themselves? Because there are several cases in the same Orange county that Disneyland is in. And I know there are now cases in Florida too. And while not enough cases to close a theme park yet (thankfully since my husband works in one), if things were to get worse that could happen. Disney parks in China have been closed for 3 or 4 weeks. In Japan, one week.
Japan and China are completely different because
A) the virus originated in China,
B) Has far more cases, and
C) is basically the government's decision to close parks in those markets.

I just simply don't think 10 or 20 cases in a state or county means you close Disney or anything. You have to ask more questions. Like I said, tons of stuff remains open despite the states having a few cases.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.