Thank you. I do that pretty regularly.Sorry to hear about your situation. Have you tried resetting the advertising ID on the affected devices?
Thank you. I do that pretty regularly.Sorry to hear about your situation. Have you tried resetting the advertising ID on the affected devices?
I’m in Europe, I have been using DuckDuckGo for quite some time now. And it’s my default search everywhere. So, sure, let Google piss away 15B for something that is only on clean installs and no guarantee.DuckDuckGo sucks. You can't find anything with it. It's completely useless. Bing and Yahoo! search suck too.
Google is the only usable one. (Especially in Europe). Even Apple Maps sucks in my country, but Google Maps is really great.
Yes. The younger demographics. Absolutely. But we are all "arguing" over our anecdotal observations on this. Google must have some stats to back up their $15B.[…]". You're telling me these people would notice the difference between bing and google?
Thank goodness you did scientific tests to uncover this Google and Big Pharma scandal. I know a guy who might help you have a convention to show your findings.Bing was never good, and would never use it (I mean - whats the difference since when is Microsoft nicer than Google??
Duckduckgo is really good these days, I almost never need to switch to Google.
Also because it's 2020 there's certain things that are actually hidden on Google, and can only be found on Duckduckgo.
Example anything health related - it's crazy how different the search results are between DDG and Google there - and it's all due to the fact that GOOG has obvious vested interests in big pharma.
I did a few tests that were mind blowing, anyone can do them - searching for Hillary Clinton email scandal for example, it was gone from Google. Things like that.
So Google is shooting itself in the foot with its "other" interests, be they political, monetary, or both (Google's parent Alphabet is massively invested in Pharma, unfortunately something Apple is also looking at)
All that being said - I would imagine DDG is probably still pretty bad in non-english speaking countries. It's only recently got good enough for me to use as default.
LOL. I looked at a halloween witch decoration this morning, and it's been popping up magically all day on every web site. Including MR.DuckDuckGo (ie anonymized Bing search with a few extra bells and whistles) serves me well 95% of the time, but there are occasions when I am forced to go back to Google as DDG just isn't giving me the results I need, which I get immediately from Google.
One thing I did notice quite quickly when I started using DDG was how the online advertising on other sites started to lose track of who I was, as they didn't have any of the Google search history cookies, which was refreshing... mind you it does now mean that I see ads like "Buy this device that uses special red light to clean your chakras and can cure 99% of known ailments and perform reiki on your reflexology points"... at which point I realize we're doomed as a species.
We’re “arguing” about apple hypocrisy by taking money from google and if apple were privacy minded they wouldn’t take money and set the default to DDG. @IllinoisCorn contention is most people wouldn’t know the difference. I agree if you are 50 or older. But 35 and under they are right there technically. 55 and under have a pretty good understanding. Apple is giving the people what they want and are getting paid for it.
This is what I am saying. Plop a search engine in front of random person A and they will just search and not really think of a "Google" search or a "DDG" or "Yahoo" search. It's ALL THE SAME TO MOST PEOPLE. The idea that one of my 45 year old peers would stop and say..."well, that's not exactly google...let me go to google.com..." is nuts.
To those in the know? There is a difference. To most people? It's just a box to type in.
Bing was never good, and would never use it (I mean - whats the difference since when is Microsoft nicer than Google??
Duckduckgo is really good these days, I almost never need to switch to Google.
Also because it's 2020 there's certain things that are actually hidden on Google, and can only be found on Duckduckgo.
Example anything health related - it's crazy how different the search results are between DDG and Google there - and it's all due to the fact that GOOG has obvious vested interests in big pharma.
I did a few tests that were mind blowing, anyone can do them - searching for Hillary Clinton email scandal for example, it was gone from Google. Things like that.
So Google is shooting itself in the foot with its "other" interests, be they political, monetary, or both (Google's parent Alphabet is massively invested in Pharma, unfortunately something Apple is also looking at)
All that being said - I would imagine DDG is probably still pretty bad in non-english speaking countries. It's only recently got good enough for me to use as default.
DuckDuckGo (ie anonymized Bing search with a few extra bells and whistles) serves me well 95% of the time, but there are occasions when I am forced to go back to Google as DDG just isn't giving me the results I need, which I get immediately from Google.
One thing I did notice quite quickly when I started using DDG was how the online advertising on other sites started to lose track of who I was, as they didn't have any of the Google search history cookies, which was refreshing... mind you it does now mean that I see ads like "Buy this device that uses special red light to clean your chakras and can cure 99% of known ailments and perform reiki on your reflexology points"... at which point I realize we're doomed as a species.
LOL. I looked at a halloween witch decoration this morning, and it's been popping up magically all day on every web site. Including MR.
As much as I dislike google their search engine is just so much better than the others. More often than not the most relevant results right up there at the top of the search. For all the money Microsoft has poured into Bing, the results are mostly terrible.
$15bill I'm sure Apple could create a Google beating Search Engine
Because of paid ads that pays for the serviceWhy would they give up $15 billion a year for the hassles and expense of operating their own search engine?
What is google surveillance ware and does it apply if the default the user has chosen is bing?well, both of you are right.
Apple is hypocrite by saying they are privacy minded company then take money and install google surveillance ware on iOS as the default
Again we’re arguing to make a point (or prove the premise) based on our anecdotal experiences.AND
A lot of people do not know the difference between the interface of Google or Yahoo. You will be surprised by this. All I can say to them its the same as much as a Shiseido cosmetic palette is the same as L’Oréal comsetic palette. Some do, but many many do not. Most people are not techies.
Because of paid ads that pays for the service
What is google surveillance ware and does it apply if the default the user has chosen is bing?
Do you seriously think Apple would net 15+ billion annually running their own search engine?
Brave Browser Caught Redirecting URLs for Cash
Here's hoping they'll learn to walk soon 😅They also crawl in addition to the anonymous bing queries.
I've been satisfied with DuckDuckGo.DuckDuckGo sucks. You can't find anything with it. It's completely useless. Bing and Yahoo! search suck too.
Google is the only usable one. (Especially in Europe). Even Apple Maps sucks in my country, but Google Maps is really great.
PrivacyWhy would they give up $15 billion a year for the hassles and expense of operating their own search engine?
If you want talk about being anti-competitive and not being fair....
"In addition, Yahoo and Microsoft have both been interested in inking a deal with Apple to overthrow Google as the default search engine on iOS devices, and the analysts suggest Google's huge payments to Apple are made to ensure Microsoft doesn't outbid it."
Never mind the app store fees. Being competitive, or not, doesn't have holes in.... its universal.