The “assisted” home is clearly a two-person race between Google and Amazon now...but I personally find one major flaw in Google’s Home Speaker/Chromecast pairing...Unles I am missing something, doesn't the TV already have to be ON for you to get your queries answered? Speaking for myself, if the TV is turned on, then it’s because I’m watching something already...and if it isn’t, then I’ll need to reach for the remote, and by that point I might as well reach for my phone...right? Until the TV’s have their assistants built-in from the factory and are “always in standby”, ready to show you your agenda or whatever, then go right back to sleep, I am NOT sold. An interim alternative: Have the tiny speakers come with a short-throw projector that throws your answer onto the wall behind it, in those cases when a visual is desired/needed.
Tv does not need to be on, just say "play YouTube videos on tv" and it will turn it on, put it to the correct input and play the video. That being said it does have to be a newer tv with CEC which most tvs in the last 10 years will have.
[doublepost=1495202281][/doublepost]
I'm in the process of switching back to Android (trialing an S8+)...Google is making it hard.
Why would I when they keep putting their apps on iOS? Guess I'll stay here...
I would ditch my iPhone in a second if google had no apps for iOS. The only reason I'm using iOS in the first place is because I got a free iPhone SE.