The New York Times reported an incorrect summary stating Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had been arrested.
The NYT didn't report it. It was an Apple AI push notification that was in error.
The New York Times reported an incorrect summary stating Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had been arrested.
That just doesn’t make sense. Two years ago Google struggled to bring Gemini into a fast moving AI landscape but look at where it is now and you’re saying they are wrong to poke fun at Siri which hasn’t moved in two years despite being owned by a company worth $500bn more than Google?that’s not the point, the point is that if Google is going to criticize for delays, they shouldn’t be delaying things themselves, which they have, and will continue to do.
Yeah, I know, that's what I'm saying, is that Apple AI messed up on those three occasions, the NYT reference is just the article pointing out the miss (e.g. the NYT pointed out the Apple AI error).The NYT didn't report it. It was an Apple AI push notification that was in error.
They are not best friends anymore. They are arch enemies 🤣 😂 , like they always have been.Also, doesn’t Google make videos about the iPhone and Pixel being like best friends or whatever, what’s with the sudden call out?
True. I wonder why Apple doesn't make such ads? Maybe because they want to show they are just "adults" and not "children" throwing a tantrum.Samsung and Google take the p!ss out of Apple
Apple never take the p!ss out of either.
Says a lot really.
That's not how the market works. You very much are only as good as your last/current performance. And GOOG's delivery velocity on Gemini as of late is pretty damn impressive whether you are GOOG or AAPL fan boi, it's hard to deny.that’s not the point, the point is that if Google is going to criticize for delays, they shouldn’t be delaying things themselves, which they have, and will continue to do.
...they're not really wrong. But I think everyone, including Apple, overestimates how many people purchase an Apple device because of Apple Intelligence. For most people it's not even in the top-10 features.
If AI isn’t adding anything to your experience it would suggest maybe you’re not using it correctly. It’s worth it just to plug a two hour transcript into it and get a meeting summary within seconds.Seeing how 99% of AI implementations fail to add anything to the end user experience I think it is justified that Apple it's taking it's time with it. Of course they shouldn't have announced it, but what's done is done. I do hope they continue in the same way they've been going, as there's no way I will allow full unfettered access to my entire device to an AI that is not on device only.
Also people who still trust Google baffle me.
My hope ( I know I'm dreaming) is that one day we are allowed to plug in and play any model into these devices, that way I can simply self host my own and not have to trust the mega corps.
The walled garden works until it doesn't. One of the major moats Apple had (has?) is dominance on silicon in AI, but they've completely been unable to leverage it for years now, while it's been a weak spot for Android devices (the inference speed and price per W/Token is incredible on the A/M series chip with Unified Memory arch, but it's basically gone totally unused and at least underleveraged).Don't get me wrong, I worked for Apple. Everything in my smart home is HomeKit. All our computers, tablets, phones, TV controllers, AirPods, and watches are Apple. We will never switch. Not even for some machine intelligence. I've used ChatGPT extensively, and it's all but useless for a consumer level client. You need tech advice? You'd be better off with YouTube!
That said, yes, Apple has again fallen into the same trap that has hindered its progress in the past, particularly under Jobs, but continued under Cook. And that trap is an obsession with secrecy and closed system of proprietary hardware and software. Yes it does provide a seamless user experience. Yes it does prevent Apple from taking advantage of the marketing hype of the AI movement.
The point of the Pixel is not to sell units en masse. Not even close. It's not even to be competitive feature/spec wise.And considering Apple sells more iPhones in a month than Google sells Pixels in an entire year... there clearly aren't a lot of people purchasing Pixels for Gemini AI...
😜
Even in the example, copilot offered to help, it didn’t insist on writing the email. It’s always a choice.All I care about is that the OS vendor lets me turn off their AI features...
![]()
The Force-Feeding of AI on an Unwilling Public
This isn't innovation, it's tyrannywww.honest-broker.com
They’re embarrassed all the the way to the bank.Even more embarrassing for Apple than that... they used a track by Dr Dre.
Beats by Dr Dre is an Apple Inc. subsidiary.
Embarrassment? It’s been a flat out no show, well the Siri AI part. Don’t know why Apple is hesitating on paying the billions for Perplexity and vastly improving their AI and to stop letting Meta poach all their Top Level AI talent.Well, they aren’t wrong. Apple Intelligence has been a flat out embarrassment thus far.
lol, I would hope not...copilot offered to help, it didn’t insist on writing the email