Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't do either or those, and neither does my wife (on her Pixel), so for me or her, why would it matter? I do edit GoPro Video quite a bit..on my Mac.. why the hell would I want to do it on a tiny-ass phone screen?

Liquid Glass sucks so bad that I'm considering switching, and with how happy my wife has been for years on the Pixel line, I'm considering one.
You should, it's a great Hw and the material design 3 is a treat.

It's good to be able to use both, my pick nowadays is Pixel, who knows next year or the next one, but the past one was Android and this will be again a Pixel.
 
Handed my iPhone to an Android user and his first comment was "This keyboard is amazing!"... that was his first impression compared to his years of Android experience. I agree; the Android keyboards that I've seen are generally poorly designed and awkward.

This ad by Google is very strange... it does nothing to really sell the Pixel on its strengths. If anything, the iPhone looks more advanced with its larger camera array.
 
I don't do either or those, and neither does my wife (on her Pixel), so for me or her, why would it matter? I do edit GoPro Video quite a bit..on my Mac.. why the hell would I want to do it on a tiny-ass phone screen?

Liquid Glass sucks so bad that I'm considering switching, and with how happy my wife has been for years on the Pixel line, I'm considering one.

You can tweak Liquid Glass in many ways. Why keep it in its stock form only to complain, when the solution is right there waiting for you? I've enabled "Accessibility > Increase Contrast" and it's much better for my eyes.
 
I remember when Google's motto was Don't Be Evil... and then it wasn't.. which is why I will never touch an Android phone. I'm not carrying around a device of a company who's revenue model is based on aggregating your personal information and using it to profit from.

Apple makes their profit from selling software and hardware. Google makes their profit by monetizing YOU!
 
Funny, I daily drive a Pixel because it feels lightyears more secure due to the constant updates pushed out to parts of the OS instead of waiting for an every-other-month update as a package of fixes. Looking at my Play Store history, I got an update to Photos, Drive, Messages, Wi-Fi provisioning, Wallet, Phone, Calendar, Contacts, Device Intelligence, Calculator, Files, and more in the last 3 days. Meanwhile, Apple last updated my iPad on Nov 3 and no patches since. Those long gaps mean there are security issues and Apple is just too big to still think they have security through obscurity. Things get exploited fast when issues are addressed so slowly.

Looking at it from another angle... wouldn't frequent updates to the OS and stock apps mean they are constantly finding weaknesses and problems, whereas iOS is stable and secure, and doesn't need as many updates?
 
I had a Pixel 9 Pro XL for a while, and while the build quality was nice, the software wasn’t. The UI feels so bubbly and cartoony, and the battery life was horrible. I actually went back to my iPhone 14 Pro Max instead and now the Pixel rots in a drawer. Just not for me, I guess, but I did give it a try.
 
What you said is the CPU and GPU is the most important... I would say the UI is the most important, and the iOS 26 UI sucks something fierce.

Mocking your competition is pretty lame, though.
Just turn off motion, and set transparency to off (tint up or whatever it is) and the UI is even faster than before. Does the design language still suck? Of course, those barless buttons in safari with an extra layer (tap) to get to the tab controls sucks. But it's far from the first to go that route, and hopefully they'll fix it sooner than later.

It isn't that I'm averse to change, it's that I'm averse to change that makes things harder, which includes change for change's sake to freshen things up as it makes it harder to use the new device.
 
You can tweak Liquid Glass in many ways. Why keep it in its stock form only to complain, when the solution is right there waiting for you? I've enabled "Accessibility > Increase Contrast" and it's much better for my eyes.

Until I can totally get rid of the obnoxious borders around the icons and widgets, I’m going to complain about it. I’ve reduced motion, and increased contrast.

..and I don’t want reduced transparency, I want zero. I’ve hated transparency since the Vista days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: platinumaqua
Looking at it from another angle... wouldn't frequent updates to the OS and stock apps mean they are constantly finding weaknesses and problems, whereas iOS is stable and secure, and doesn't need as many updates?
But every time an iOS .x patch comes out, it's followed with an article on macrumors saying it fixes 50+ security issues, some of which were being actively exploited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
thumbs-up.gif
 
More Wicked garbage tie-in slop?

Listen, I'm tired of this. I've seen a sign in town advertising "the wicked barber". I've seen ads for cars. I've seen ads for food. What in the world is supposed to get me to want to buy a car after purportedly seeing this movie, let alone a Pixel?
 
More Wicked garbage tie-in slop?

Listen, I'm tired of this. I've seen a sign in town advertising "the wicked barber". I've seen ads for cars. I've seen ads for food. What in the world is supposed to get me to want to buy a car after purportedly seeing this movie, let alone a Pixel?
Movie studio executives know theaters are on their last legs, so they’re praying over saturation will get you to relent and watch the movie they’ve spent millions on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
Love my iPhone (privacy is important to me). Have no problem with Pixel. its a great phone.

I just don't think that ad does what they hope. By the time it ends, it seems more like a buddy ad than, a slight against iPhone.
 
These Google vs iPhones ads are always fun to watch and this is no different. iPhones do have to catch up a lot on AI features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I can't tell a speed difference between my SE 2022 and 16 Pro, at all. Considering I play zero games, and do zero photo/video editing, how would I even tell? When it comes to CPU speed, I just don't care, and benchmarks do nothing for me. Same thing coming from an M1 Air to M4 Pro; they feel the same.

What I can tell, though, is how much liquid glass sucks.

Your experience is very common and the kind that drives markets and marketing. Spec heads are so interested in pushing the tech envelope that they forget consumer devices are bought by consumers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
Until I can totally get rid of the obnoxious borders around the icons and widgets, I’m going to complain about it. I’ve reduced motion, and increased contrast.

..and I don’t want reduced transparency, I want zero. I’ve hated transparency since the Vista days.

Try looking at your accessibility options.

Settings>Accessibility>Display & Text Size

Turn off "Show borders". Experiment with other settings too.
 
Google and Apple are both U.S. companies. Do we have a percentage of iPhone vs Pixel users?

Even if Google is the first to implement features through android, Apple still makes sure when they implement the same feature to be amost perfect.

And then there's app updates that gets released in iOS first before the android counterpart and iOS apps are more polished than the android counterpart.
So you wanna tell me liquid glass is a perfect implementation
 
Except they left out the part about iphone coming out first and rat Schmitt sat on the Apple board taking notes and stabbing his friend Steve Jobs in the back.
 
It matters. You don’t get to rewrite computing history because you don’t like the fact Apple dominates a specific category.

You seem to be making a lot of assumptions about the person you’re arguing with, and for someone talking about “rewriting history” you continuously leave out how prior to the A7 it was iPhone fans who argued till they were blue in the face that benchmarks didn’t matter. How do you know that this person hasn’t argued “benchmarks don’t matter” the entire time and has never shifted their position?
 
Ok, closing off my brain to my tech side and evaluating on premise: This ad seem to be about how you can’t go wrong with Pixel or iPhone, they are comparable and both are good.

It’s a bold strategy, Cotton, let’s see if it pays off.
 


Google this week shared a new ad in its ongoing anti-Apple "BestPhonesForever" series, this time leaning into the launch of the new Wicked: For Good movie that's out in theaters.


The spot features an iPhone fawning over a Pixel smartphone before breaking into the Wicked: For Good song. Google suggests that it was first to multiple features that the iPhone then copied, like screening phone calls and removing unwanted images from photos.It's not clear how Google's ad featuring singing smartphones might attract customers to Pixel devices given that it doesn't share details on any actual features.

Google has been sharing ads that pit its Pixel smartphones against the iPhone since 2023, and it's become a popular ad campaign with Pixel fans with more than 30 in the series. The ads typically include feature comparisons or criticize the iPhone for lacking features like conversational AI.

Article Link: Google Mocks iPhone in Musical ‘Wicked’ Ad Claiming Pixel Firsts
Especially in the year where every feature of the new pixel phones that are lauded by reviewers are features directly copied from apple (like "pixelsnap", which is literally magsafe that apple donated the specs for, or now private compute and airdrop) this ad is really disingenuous. Let's not forget what the whole of Android looked like before the iPhone and then after the iPhone... Sure, android gets some features first, but implying that iOS is the one that constantly needs android for inspiration. Damn
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: digimc and BMox81
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.