Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hilarious how so many people call this ugly, while they’ve been dealing with a NOTCH for years

I don’t care how the back of my phone looks I buy a case for it anyway. Now there is no hiding that monstrosity on top of the iPhone. I have to see it everyday

Sorry you struggle with that. I don't even notice the notch on my XR. It's almost like the screen has "extra" space for the indicators so they don't take up the main screen space.
 
Why not someone other than Apple Google or MSFT?

Google isnt strggling to survive in the smartphone market. They are the largest player by userbase. 🤷🏾‍♂️😂

Imagine saying rooting for a trillion dollar company because “competition”.

Don't mistake hardware sales for Android (software). Does Google earn a licensing fee for every Android user, or is it free? That's an important factor in how much monetary benefit there is for Google. Market share does not equal profits. Look at Apple. Huge profits, but not the largest user base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Google is not a hardware company, they don’t have passion for it, nothing will change it. With Pixel 6 series they need to build strong marketing story to justify super high price, so here we go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I don’t know why they didn’t just stick with the Pixel 5 form factor, it was perfect, completely symmetrical bezel-less screen all the way around. At least it doesn’t have a notch!
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Read in an interview with a google exec that the Pro will be expensive, so I expect to see pricing on par with Apple. Apparently they want to get into the high premium segment… just, how many will they sell and can they recoup the money they invested into SOC development??
i realize that Google has deep pockets but …
Anyway, competition is a good thing so looking forward to real life reviews and such
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
My 6P back in the day had a similar visor design. The soft case I had was super-thin and covered the visor except some cutouts for the cameras, flash, etc.

Although, I do think a case that lets the visor poke through would look rad. It would only need to have reinforced rails along the visor edges to do the job, so I don't think it's that crazy of an idea.

My 6P was one of the only good android phones I'd ever had. I sometimes forget about it given all the HTCs I had.
 
I bet they will even preload the Facebook app for you!🤮🤮 most android users prefer cheap Samsung phones, so not sure who they are marketing this too? love the bezels🤮🤮 love the racing stripe on back🤮🤮 one plus is you won't need air tags to track your stuff, Google has that covered for you!🤮🤮 imagine the uproar if Apple released this thing!😂😂😂
 
I think the custom SoC is mostly marketing BS to make it sound like they have their own processor, just like Apple. The number of phones they sell wouldn’t justify anything more than tweaking someone else’s job.
Also that helps them justifying the camera software features’ exclusivity: before it looked like they just kept them for themselves for no reason, now it will look like there’s hardware reason. Just like Apple did not to give some features to older iPhones owners.
Let’s be clear, I think the phone and especially the camera will be great but the custom SoC is probably mostly marketing.
I assume that it is mostly about them taking their AI chip technology (which they have made chips for this for a long time) and applying it to a phone, and, more importantly, they can support the devices for a longer period of time as they will no longer be limited by the length of time that Qualcom supports chips (or the other chip vendors, Qualcom just being the largest).
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
While the back kinda looks like the older Samsungs, I'm excited about this phone. While Google is obtrusive in many data gathering aspects, the data gets put the use. Google Assistant is probably 5 years ahead of Siri now if not more. That's the one of the things I miss owning an iPhone, and their still images are going to be insane with I would assume applying super res zoom to the abilities of the periscope zoom. That's the other thing I wish Apple would do...but I have a year old Apple Watch, so I'm in a "sell it and get a Garmin or something" situation, or just stick with Apple a little while longer hoping they finally get zoom that doesn't suck, years after everyone else...
Siri still has not caught up to version 1 of Assistant. On the watch front, Apple Watch is great but I switched to a Garmin Fenix which, besides the 12 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, just fits my use case better since I am an ultra distance cyclist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Hilarious how so many people call this ugly, while they’ve been dealing with a NOTCH for years

I don’t care how the back of my phone looks I buy a case for it anyway. Now there is no hiding that monstrosity on top of the iPhone. I have to see it everyday
The issue isn't looking at it, it's feeling it get snagged on your pocket liner. iPhones have camera bumps too, and they're annoying. Also, I don't even have a newer iPhone, but whenever I use one (or the many Android knockoffs of it), I don't even notice the notch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Not Apple

I don't know if OnePlus was the first, but this pre-dates the iPhone 11 Pro, the first iPhone to use the pro moniker.

So before anyone says it, no, Google did not copy Apple.
Except Apple has been using “pro” (ie MacBook Pro, Mac Pro) for their computers since 2006 during the switch to Intel processors…
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
What I don’t understand is why Google wants to be in the smartphone business in the first place. It’s a cutthroat business where Apple eats up the majority of the profits and everybody else (with the possible exception of Samsung) competes for scraps. In the US market it’s an effective duopoly, and even well-funded competitors like LG, Motorola, and Microsoft have failed. Given Google’s nonexistent market share, it is virtually guaranteed that this division loses money and highly unlikely that this will change in the future. Furthermore, if it did, it would be at the expense of Google’s own partners like Samsung and Qualcomm. If Google is concerned about something in the Android ecosystem- like Qualcomm, OEMs, and carriers’ refusal to give long-term support, it needs to use its clout as the developer of Android to force them to behave, not make its own sorta-custom SoC. If it wants a hero device to compete with the iPhone, plenty of Android OEMs already make great devices. Hardware is not software, and being great at software doesn’t mean you’ll succeed in hardware (or vice-versa). Google is not Apple. You cannot both be the steward of a diverse ecosystem and the biggest OEM/chipmaker. Apple’s approach works for Apple partly because they realize this and don’t aim for market share dominance. Google will eventually realize this too, but only after burning billions of dollars and countless partnerships in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I hope Apple takes some notes with the under-display fingerprint scanner. It seems clear face masks aren't completely going away any time soon (and yes I own an Apple Watch, and no the feature doesn't work for me).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacBH928
What I don’t understand is why Google wants to be in the smartphone business in the first place. It’s a cutthroat business where Apple eats up the majority of the profits and everybody else (with the possible exception of Samsung) competes for scraps. In the US market it’s an effective duopoly, and even well-funded competitors like LG, Motorola, and Microsoft have failed. Given Google’s nonexistent market share, it is virtually guaranteed that this division loses money and highly unlikely that this will change in the future. Furthermore, if it did, it would be at the expense of Google’s own partners like Samsung and Qualcomm. If Google is concerned about something in the Android ecosystem- like Qualcomm, OEMs, and carriers’ refusal to give long-term support, it needs to use its clout as the developer of Android to force them to behave, not make its own sorta-custom SoC. If it wants a hero device to compete with the iPhone, plenty of Android OEMs already make great devices. Hardware is not software, and being great at software doesn’t mean you’ll succeed in hardware (or vice-versa). Google is not Apple. You cannot both be the steward of a diverse ecosystem and the biggest OEM/chipmaker. Apple’s approach works for Apple partly because they realize this and don’t aim for market share dominance. Google will eventually realize this too, but only after burning billions of dollars and countless partnerships in the process.
It's two different business models; Google doesn't care about making profit on the hardware. They want to hook people on their ecosystem and monetize their personal information & search history.
 
Thats actually a nice looking phone, a nice change. Also the software looks solid and uniform, if I would use an Android phone this would be it. Google really knows how to create functioning and easy to use software. But of course, I am not selling my soul for it and will keep using iPhones. Waiting for the nice FOSS community to make non-evil version of it.

In an extremely ironic manner, the privacy focused Android versions prefer the Google Pixel hardware.
Well Qualcomm is getting in trouble now

Qualcomm has some big patents in Wireless or Wifi, something like that. They make the best modems and they seem to be here for the foreseeable future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.