What you may be seeing is 93% usage of 81% iOS 11 users?
Nope. I'm seeing 93% of USERS are on iOS 11. Not usage.
What you may be seeing is 93% usage of 81% iOS 11 users?
Industry pushed 3D TV, some adopted and embraced it, most did not care. In the end the majority won as it did not add value to the consumer and only the industry stood to gain. We are seeing the same thing with phones and mobile OS.
The above is irrelevant to the comment you quoted.
None of the above was ever alluded to.
You should of just straight posted your own comment instead of the quoting.
Secondly, who are you to say what a user needs?
Do you have data to back up that claim?
You can try and use 3DTV adoption as a data point to substatiate all the claims you make in the above, but one has nothing to do with the other.
Unless you have something to back up your chatter, it’s just noise.
Also the "holding it wrong" thing happened over 8 years go. Get over it. Samsung wasn't even making real smartphones way back then.
3D TV died, but it wasn’t a waste of time or resources. It helped in the creation of 4K TV. 3D TV doubled the pixels on the horizontal, just not the vertical.
imagine iPhone X wont receive iOS 12 update. It will be world war.
Nope. I'm seeing 93% of USERS are on iOS 11. Not usage.
Useable, but vulnerable.Yeah except my mothers phone running Android 5 can still run pretty much any App on Google Play. Can iOS 5 run 90% of the App Store?
This whole dig against Android is pointless unless you're obsessed with always having the latest and greatest. Older versions of Android are still good and completely usable. Probably more usable than older versions of iOS.
If the above in red is true, that’s a cryin’ shame.
Android's ‘version’ of the iOS screen time feature was announced first.I see some major similarities between the iOS and android 9. Swipe up gesture, Android version of the iOS 12's "screen time" feature.
third?Well my S7 is on it's third full OS update since I purchased it, so about the same as my iPhone 7. It's all very good getting updates for around 4 years with the iPhone (or any other phone for that matter) but the weak spot in this scenario is the battery. The batteries in both my S7 and my iPhone 7 are now showing signs of tiredness, yet it's not economic to replace them in either model.
I agree that malicious apps are more of a problem on android. However google are doing something to try and combat this, namely by issuing monthly security updates and the google play protect feature which scans every app you install on the playstore before it’s installed.You are correct in that Android is like Windows OS. Security is an afterthought and viruses run rampant on these platforms. That alone should get folks rallying together to force Google to do more. When your phone needs and Antivirus application and you have to be cautious when downloading apps in the Play Store, Google is doing something wrong. We need updates and getting them frequently is never a bad thing.
[doublepost=1533593106][/doublepost]
Oops, I meant iPhone 5s. 5 years ago.
Incredibly inaccurate. I used iPhones for 4 years and my first Android phone is the one I currently have which is the S8. I have found the Android system is more than an equal to iOS.You keep finding issues to hate with iOS while defending the fact that most brand new Android phones will never be eligible to get an OS update. They're obsolete from the day you buy them.
Midrange and budget phones may not get updated, but you get what you pay for afterall. All android flagship phones will get at least 2 years if OS updates and 3 years ot security updates.Then don't upgrade. No one forces you to do so.
Planned obsolescence is an absolute joke. It's simply the fact that each new OS version (not just of iOS but Windows, Linux, and every other operating system out there) generally requires more resources. Those put a larger tax on the processor, RAM, etc. That's what slows things down. Not this tinfoil hat no-proof planned obsolescence.
You keep finding issues to hate with iOS while defending the fact that most brand new Android phones will never be eligible to get an OS update. They're obsolete from the day you buy them.
3D TV died, but it wasn’t a waste of time or resources. It helped in the creation of 4K TV. 3D TV doubled the pixels on the horizontal, just not the vertical.
Certainly hope so as whilst I might prefer actually using iOS, Android definitely looks nicer.Will they ever get tired of copying iOS? Look at the left panels, they look a lot like iOS 7.
Nope, all new security features, privacy features & all the new API has to be updated with "whole OS". So you might get new apps or some new components but still runs on same APIs & might take advantage of old privacy permission model on Android the same wayInternals are frequently upgraded as Android is very modular. It doesn't require a "whole OS" upgrade. So one could technically be running an older build of Android per se, but with latest internals.
How is what you're describing not planned obsolescence? The original iPhone had CPU and RAM* capable of powering the most common app usages of modern iPhones. Why should we need way more resources to do the same tasks as before?Planned obsolescence is an absolute joke. It's simply the fact that each new OS version (not just of iOS but Windows, Linux, and every other operating system out there) generally requires more resources. Those put a larger tax on the processor, RAM, etc. That's what slows things down. Not this tinfoil hat no-proof planned obsolescence.
LinuxMint maybe. My experience with Ubuntu Desktop has been that it downloads updates even when I thought I turned that feature off. I normally use Ubuntu Server but was afraid to do so on my (secondary) laptop.Yes with Linux you never have to update pretty much if you don't want to. No red flags popping up every other day. Android updates are pretty hassle free as well.
It's not misleading, just a statement. The updates matter in Android too, as they do in other Linux-based OSs. You don't really know whether you've got all the security patches if you aren't up to date.Not to mention that the Google Apps have been split out from the OS and are available in the Play Store. So you can also be running an older OS, but essentially be up to date that way. The 12% number is incredibly misleading since it isn't an Apples to Apples comparison (see what I did there?)
It's to mask how out of touch with humans they are.Is it just me, or does Google give Android versions these stupid codenames so as to mask just how much behind their installed base is?