In that case they are copying the market entry rather than the idea.
So, if Apple releases a smart watch will they be copying the market entry, the idea or both?
In that case they are copying the market entry rather than the idea.
Me and 68k others paid good money to an unproven new company for a smart watch that wasn't even expected to exist for another 6 months, and could very well turn out to be crap. So, is there a market for a smart watch from an established tech company? Absolutely.
BTW, I've had my pebble for a week, and I'm loving it.
all these companies jumping on the bandwagon in hopes they dont miss out on the next ipod craze.
Can you tell us whats been copied because as far as i know Apple havent made a smartwatch yet? unless you can copy vapuorware
So, Samsung has done smart watches before, Sony has made smart watches before and Google's Motorola has made smart watches before and they are copying Apple non existent smart watch?
Sometimes I'm amazed with this forum
I'm sorry but I don't see where you see any copying since there is no iWatch to copy. It makes perfect sense for the competition to compete in what seems to be a growing market.
So the companies who already have ANNOUNCED products are copying a company that has NOT yet announced such a product. I guess that only makes sense in the world of Apple fans.
By the way, in your opinion, is Samsung also copying Apple with their Smart TVs? After all, Samsung has been selling Smart TVs for years now while the iTV is still just a silly rumor. But they sure are copying Apple, aren't they?
And why would that be amusing. Other manufacturers would be further pioneering the product and Apple would be left on the sidelines until they either did on themselves or lost out on potential revenue.
Companies aren't going to drop a watch project because Apple says they aren't making one. Do you have some information about products that have been rumored by Apple that other companies have said they are working on and THEN when Apple said they weren't working on anything were dropped?
Yeah - only Samsung already has/had smart watches. So maybe you want to revise your statement?
The concept of smart watches have been around for a long time. The pebble seems to be the first to get released though. Looks like some Android ones are already available
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartwatch
And some Samsungs one on this apple fanboy site
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13...ill-be-companys-third-stab-at-wrist-accessory
Yap, because companies are totally silly and they act according to rumors on blogs
The flip side is - that Apple doesn't SAY they are working on a watch but rumors surface. Concurrently other manufacturers are also working on watches.
So what does a company do? Do they not speak up? Because whether they release theirs before or after - they will still (on here as example) be accused of copying either way.
Or do they speak up.
Not everything is about copying Apple. The industry moves forward. Companies are expanding their technology portfolios.
I find it hilarious that so many people think that all these companies do all day is wait around for Apple to create something so that they can begin to work on copying it.
Really, people are saying that google is copying apple?
This is a natural extension of google glass which has been in development for years.
Samsung already has previous versions of a smart watch. As did others. And yet there are "daft" people (or ones with their heads in the sand) who refuse to acknowledge that Apple isn't always first.
Clearly all of this was talked about and shared with Eric Schmidt while he was on the board. He then broke into the mainframe and downloaded all of Apple's plans from now until the end of time on a USB drive and ran away....
I seem to have missed Apple's announcement confirming their development of a smart watch.
So, if Apple releases a smart watch will they be copying the market entry, the idea or both?
In that case they are copying the market entry rather than the idea.
Well technically the first rumors of the current market entry for smart watch is about Apple. So u tell me...
Google & Samsung's definition of innovation: COPY APPLE.
Well technically the first rumors of the current market entry for smart watch is about Apple. So u tell me...
That's two "monkey see, monkey do"'s that I dished out this week. Who's next, Microsoft?
Well, technically, Sony, Samsung, Motorola or Pebble have had smart watches in the market prior to Apple rumors. So u tell me...
It's refreshing to see these rational posts. Personally I too find it difficult to see how any of these companies can copy something from Apple that doesn't exist. Especially when other companies already made these watches years before any iWatch rumors started.
Rationalize it all you want.
Your comment illustrates one of the issues with several posters on this board who see things in black and white. If you say something positive about another company or criticize Apple - you must be a "hater."
Clearly.
----------
"the current market entry"
LOL
That sounds rather silly. The market already has been entered.
I would offer to help you move that goalpost - but apparently it's light enough you can do it all on your own
Is there no innovation in rumors anymore?
Why do Samsung rumors and Google rumors just copy Apple rumors? Can't they come up with rumors of their own? Do they make up a checklist of Apple rumor features to compare with so they can make their rumors even more like Apple rumors?
Of course they are. And it will be released after Apple does lol
The Google Android watch will blow away any locked-down limited function watch that Apple inflicts on the marketplace.
Don't get me wrong - the Apple watch might appeal to Apple's core technophobe customer. But anybody who wants to determine for themselves what the watch will do for them will choose the Android model. Apple is losing market share with its main profit-maker, the iPhone. But they never allow customers to use their electronics the way the customer wants, no matter how small a market niche they fall to.
But... Google Glasses?
It's refreshing to see these rational posts. Personally I too find it difficult to see how any of these companies can copy something from Apple that doesn't exist. Especially when other companies already made these watches years before any iWatch rumors started.
I don't see the point of smart watch, I don't think people are interested in a watch that needs to be recharged everyday
Also, what kind of apps could the watch run? Only calendar, clock and music player? or we are going to see a 3.5" watch in the future?
Google & Samsung's definition of innovation: COPY APPLE.
I wonder how may of the "Smart watch? Dumbest idea ever!" commenters on this thread felt the same way about the iPad mini (or even, going way back, to the original iPod, which had tons of critics).
Oh really? Mind showing me Apple's smart watch that Google and Samsung copied?
----------
I wonder how many of the "Smart watch? Dumbest idea ever!" commenters on this thread will stand in line outside the Apple Store for 4 days to get the first Apple smart watch simply because it has an Apple logo on it.
Except when Apple released the iPhone, it wasn't the first smartphone out there either. But then almost everyone copied off Apple.
Apple may not make the first smartwatch, but you can be sure that if they make one, people will copy Apple's design and UI, not the previous ones.
Probably the same number of apple-haters who were initally like "The tablet, an oversized phone? nah..." and ended up queuing in non-existent lines for a Samsung galaxy tab when it came out.