You guys can install Google Hangouts for all messaging and use the web version of Hangouts on your Macs.
That's a really good idea, I never thought of installing Hangouts. Thanks for the tip!
You guys can install Google Hangouts for all messaging and use the web version of Hangouts on your Macs.
I never have Bluetooth pairing issues on my Samsung devices except for the Chromebook Plus which is a known bug. The Bluetooth pairing and detecting will not be a issue with Google phones just like it's not a issue with most Android phones.
Yes they destroyed Apple's advantage with the portrait mode. The most common portrait shot today is the selfie. Google has you covered there, Apple not.
What I like about the dual camera on the other hand is telephoto. The internet is spammed with wide angle pictures, so going tele is a welcomed feature.
Eh, it's crap. I use it at work. Good feature set, but it drops during calls, runs 100% CPU*, etc. Unrelated, there's a strangely unintuitive interface for calling people. Greatly prefer FaceTime; Hangouts could be good but needs to mature.You guys can install Google Hangouts for all messaging and use the web version of Hangouts on your Macs.
I don't know why, but Bluetooth still doesn't work right in 2017. I gave up on it years ago and thought they'd fixed the pairing by now, but apparently not. Something goes wrong at every edge case. I doubt it's the standard but rather the bad implementations of it, or maybe the standard makes things confusing for devs and causes bugs like that (see: XMPP).google's solution isn't that great. bluetooth pairing sucks. needs something smarter. right now my QC35 bluetooth headphones has trouble detecting which device i want to hear from and i have to launch their stupid app to prevent the headphones from pairing with my macbook. really annoying.
i can always switch devices with my airpods with one or two taps/clicks. absolutely a breeze to do.
Then maybe you are better off using Facebook messaging since its everywhere.Eh, it's crap. I use it at work. Good feature set, but it drops during calls, runs 100% CPU*, etc. Unrelated, there's a strangely unintuitive interface for calling people. Greatly prefer FaceTime; Hangouts could be good but needs to mature.
* only in the web version, not the iOS app, it seems
The instant translate feature itself, in Google Pixel Bud, already worth more than that $159 price tag!Airpods 2 $159
"$159?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA" ( https://twitter.com/MKBHD/status/773594097323872259 )
Google Pixel Buds $159
"Cool!"
https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/5/16428570/google-pixel-2-no-headphone-jack-apple-wireless-futureSo Nilay did write about Google removing the headphone jack on the Pixel but it still seems as though Google gets graded on a curve (this article is just as much about Apple as Google). I guess that’s what happens when you get exclusives, you just become long-form advertising which is what The Verge is now.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/5/16426754/pixel-2-headphone-jack-bluetooth-walled-garden
No, I was talking about the front surface fully covered in fabric which original Home didn't have. Pretty obvious IMO. Yes, everyone knows how speakers look, but first Echo and Home had different unique design (unlike HomePod which looks like a generic speaker), but now they altered it in the style of your speakers and I believe the reason might be the HomePod. Is it clear now?Are you talking about the fabric skin that the original Google home has? The one that was released before home pod was even announced? When I come to think of it, all my speakers have fabric skin, and they are over 30 years old.
I admire Google for even attempting to fix this kind of monumental issue. I think only them and IBM think big in this regard. Apple is happy to sell small-minded shiny baubles in their petty, little, closed world.
Really hope Apple offers up a smaller, cheaper HomePod...
The instant translate feature itself, in Google Pixel Bud, already worth more than that $159 price tag!
I don't know. I like it. The back has a kind of Ikea chic.But the design of the Pixel 2 leaves a lot to be desired. iPhone and Samsung phones are still impressive when it comes to design.
So Nilay did write about Google removing the headphone jack on the Pixel but it still seems as though Google gets graded on a curve (this article is just as much about Apple as Google). I guess that’s what happens when you get exclusives, you just become long-form advertising which is what The Verge is now.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/5/16426754/pixel-2-headphone-jack-bluetooth-walled-garden
No, I was talking about the front surface fully covered in fabric which original Home didn't have. Pretty obvious IMO. Yes, everyone knows how speakers look, but first Echo and Home had different unique design (unlike HomePod which looks like a generic speaker), but now they altered it in the style of your speakers and I believe the reason might be the HomePod. Is it clear now?
It’s funny and eerie how Google and Amazon did copy HomePod’s fabric skin style in their speakers
I always felt the verge leaned more Apple than google anyway lol.I think you should not get your negativity about The Verge (you certainly are very opinionated about them, checking your posting history) into the way. In that article he was quite clear that he didn’t like the fact that the jack was removed. Just like when Apple did it. Or how could he ever concluded the article with And that... is pretty user-hostile and stupid
Did you actually read the article at all?
The Verge has like many techsites different writers. This Vlad guy seems to think somehow the removal of the jack was justified according to another article.
Astonishing though that this thread is running so long. A thread about niche products and vaporware, at best demos of a technological platform. For most people around the world the products are not even orderable. As a competitor for specific products (phone, speakers, etc) Google is therefor irrelevant in the grand scheme of things to Apple. Which is a shame, because competition is good.
I do, but it's not good for video calls. Or IDK if it can even do them.Then maybe you are better off using Facebook messaging since its everywhere.
Have you read anywhere about how big the Buds case is in comparison to the Airpods? The convenience of being able to carry AirPods everywhere without taking up much pocket space is a huge factor for me. I wonder how much larger the Google Buds case is.I wish I would have waited for these prior to getting my AirPods. The design is much more aesthetically pleasing than Apple’s Q-tip shaped alternative. Also, the AirPods’ silver accents truly make it look like you’re wearing earrings at times. The flush, discrete shape of the Pixel Buds, combined with a cord attaching the two to one another, makes for a more practical solution.
Duo is nicer, and now it has a good web client too. Also WhatsApp is pretty good.It also has a desktop client so you can see the messages from your phone when you’re sitting down at your computer.That's a really good idea, I never thought of installing Hangouts. Thanks for the tip!
Unless you consider how you are selling your soul to google and giving them access to all your data / letting all the ads in.
That's what I meant. You didn't get it.Nope that's not what you said.
This first Google home was never suppose to be a great audio device, it was made to more or less beta test the concept of a Google Assistant device. This is evident with the rapid release of fetures on an almost weekly basis. With the functionality of the Google home software almost complete, Google is now making a high performance version, no one wants to beta test a 400$ speaker.
Hope you’re wrong. I could care less about audio quality, I just want something other than my phone(s) that I can ‘Hey, Siri’ to.Doubt so.
It’s simply not feasible to offer great speaker quality at that cheap a price point. When you look at the amazon echo, it’s purpose is clear - as a means of delivering a smart assistant to your home and collect your data. This makes sense for amazon and google but not for Apple, since that’s not Apple's business model.
That's what I meant. You didn't get it.
It’s funny and eerie how Google and Amazon did copy HomePod’s fabric skin style in their speakers
When I wrote my first comment I was sure someone will reply something like what you have replied. At times I just want to restrain from comments because I can see such outcome and I don't want to explain and expand every single word so the last kid on Earth will understand me. You tried to be smart and funny but instead it was boring and predictable. If you politely asked why I do think so, I would explain it and we could discuss it, but you preferred the different way.
As @trusso said recently "You find a bunch of people who simply enjoy making smart-ass remarks with nothing to back them up. As a cultural phenomena, that needs to stop."
[doublepost=1507333033][/doublepost]It’s funny and eerie how Google and Amazon did copy HomePod’s fabric skin style in their speakers
Hope you’re wrong. I could care less about audio quality, I just want something other than my phone(s) that I can ‘Hey, Siri’ to.
[doublepost=1507348411][/doublepost]How many Google apps do you have on your Android, I mean iPhone?For the money, why wouldn't I just buy the real iPhone?
Edit: Other than the live translation, if there's a use for that and it works well.