It’s still one persons experienceFor me, a persons experience trumps some “award”, cars and phones included. May be the same or not for others.
my experience with pixel 7 pro has been great overall
It’s still one persons experienceFor me, a persons experience trumps some “award”, cars and phones included. May be the same or not for others.
Glad you’re having a great experience with your pixel. However an award such as this is still a few peoples opinions.It’s still one persons experience
my experience with pixel 7 pro has been great overall
Dream on, Google
Aren’t you in the comments too?I think they made these ads just to read the haters' comments on this thread 😁
Give them time, they will be back.There must be something good about the Pixel as several of my friends and colleagues are using them after a decade plus with iPhone and say they won’t go back to iOS. I know it’s often argued the Pixel has the best smartphone camera out there and maybe the different OS approach is refreshing to some. I can’t see myself leaving the iPhone anytime soon but I’m not arrogantly going to claim it’s the best phone out there as it’s clearly a subjective topic. Let’s face it, iOS hasn’t changed an awful lot in several years so Google are probably poking a bit of fun at that.
Maybe...maybe not. Not everyone thinks apple is the be all end all.Give them time, they will be back.
Give them time, they will be back.
Apple is at least kind of trying with privacy.
But they are failing just as badly as anyone else - a phone is a tracking device by definition, pretty difficult to make this private. They try, but they fail.
In addition, they keep adding "agency" backdoors, they lost their fight with the FBI etc.
What do you think is the reason the FBI and government have stopped complaining that Apple locked down the iPhone?
Is it
A - Apple added backdoors as requested, or
B - They knew they lost so they... ummm...
Yeah. It's (A).
This is how it went:
FBI went to Apple, said, guys, we need backdoors. Apple said no, we are a privacy company, no backdoors. FBI went to 3rd party "hacker" tool manufacturers, bought their services. Apple tolerates it and doesn't fix those holes - plausible deniability on all sides, the FBI gets what it wants, they can get into any device. Apple gets to keep pretending iPhones are private and safe. Everyone's happy. The end.
A classic hypocritical compromise as they love to do in California.
Do you have actual proof, not what apple tells you, that they are? Real proof, not marketing jargon etc. Bet you don't. They (all tech companies) are all the same. YOU ARE AN ATM. Nothing more. They will tell you what you want to hear to take your money. No one is any better than the other for "privacy". If you think otherwise, I have some beachfront property in Antarctica for you. Google is not wrong either. The iPhone is stale and boring.Do you have any proof of any of this? If so, can you provide it?
Phones can track you location but if Apple is anonymizing that data, it doesn't interfere with privacy.
The reason the FBI gave up on Apple is that a third-party gave them a way to crack the phone. There was a court case and Apple was not forced to assist the FBI. Apple did request that the details of the crack be provided to them and the FBI refused.
Those are the basic facts. Everything else is your opinion.
The winky face in my reply implied sarcasm. But in all seriousness, if any person really could benefit from those things and wouldn't be affected by leaving the apple ecosystem it would make more sense to own an Android phone.I want iOS more than all of those combined. I figured that was implied.
But you know what I’d like more? An iPhone will any or all of those things.
Highly rated by a for profit org means they got paid the most from top competitor.It means it’s highly rated which is a sign of how good a device it is. point is using one person’s experience to prove a point isn’t a good idea
Do you have actual proof, not what apple tells you, that they are?
Highly rated by a for profit org means they got paid the most from top competitor.
Apples innovations seem to be only benefiting those with shares or heavy investment within the company. I’m a share holder and I can tell you my investment hasn’t really made the moves I was promised when I dropped nearly a decades worth of savings into the company.Funny, you just complained that Apple has stopped innovating while complaining they changed too much.
Even funnier, I sort of agree. It actually makes sense that there wouldn’t be dramatic changes to a 15 year old product if it is still selling well, but I wish they wouldn’t keep removing old iOS features. I have the opposite complaint of most, it seems, as I wish they would stop trying to make iOS more like MacOS, as I already have a Mac, and I preferred the less cluttered iOS to the newer versions, especially on the iPad mini. I hate that you can no longer turn off multi-window and I can’t count the number of times I’ve unintentionally opened a second window or clicked the 3 dots while selecting the URL line in iOS Safari. I figured the iPad would be a good basic internet device for my mother, but since that change she gets too frustrated to use it. After that, I started to notice it more and realized how much it was happening to me, too. I hate it when everyone goes “Steve Jobs would have never”, but he was very vocal that iOS and MacOS were intentionally separate due to the touch interface, and I worry about how much they are merging them. /rant
They have not merged S Series with Note Series. Note Series is now Ultra Series and S Series is still there as S1X and S1X+The Note series and the S series were redundant. That's why merging the two made sense especially when the second half of the year is devoted to foldable.
Ah yes I remember this one. I haven’t been back to the site in awhile so just now getting around to saying thanks.![]()
Watch Lil Wayne give Samsung’s Galaxy S7 Edge a champagne bath
The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.www.theverge.com
Maybe you invested in the wrong company and should get out and take the gains (and tax). They seem to be doing something right and in order for something to be a benefit it has to start somewhere.Apples innovations seem to be only benefiting those with shares or heavy investment within the company. I’m a share holder and I can tell you my investment hasn’t really made the moves I was promised when I dropped nearly a decades worth of savings into the company.
The new headset is amazing. But it won’t benefit anyone for at least a decade as it’s just priced itself out of hundreds of millions of households across the globe.
When you can purchase reliable transportation OR buy a headset that doesn’t really do anything new. I think something has to give.
And the morphing of macOS and iOS is something I despise as well. While I understand apple wants to streamline the feel and shape of its operating systems. They are alienating people who spend big money for unique products that feel unique and do unique things.
Venturas system preferences menu is a UI nightmare. And lacks the depth its predecessor does. As you said it, they took away features.
They did. And they seem proud of doing so.
Apple takes things away and tells us we’re lucky to be there to buy their products.
Seems pedantic doesn’t it?