Monitored alarm system, with motion detectors, will make your house less attractive than the other 95% of houses that don't have them.
Monitored alarm system, with motion detectors, will make your house less attractive than the other 95% of houses that don't have them.
In what world do the police, I mean troopers, take fingerprints for petty burglaries?
Everyone else has done a fine job of picking apart the first post but what I didn't see is anyone pointing out that Squilly finally refers to the "business" that he was going to or got in on as "sketchy". I'm impressed that you finally admitted this so-called "business" is indeed sketchy. And I assume everyone knew about the "business". You aren't hard to track down from what I can tell.(this is my brother with the sketchy overseas business) that absolutely no one except family knew about).
A bit more legit than being robbed 4 times and waiting almost 2 weeks to call the police.Edit 3: you joined today and this is your only post... Seems legit.
Monitored alarm system, with motion detectors, will make your house less attractive than the other 95% of houses that don't have them.
In what world do the police, I mean troopers, take fingerprints for petty burglaries?

They only seem to come by when no cars are at the house, which is why we set up a surveillance system. Why they came 4 times instead of taking things all at once? No idea.
Monitored alarm system, with motion detectors, will make your house less attractive than the other 95% of houses that don't have them.
anyone know the age of the poster. This is beyond ridiculous but good mid day fodder.
First, why didn't anyone tell me Squilly returned! This is the best part of MR today
I don't think that is surprising. When my two bikes were stolen from Building garage two locks were cut and the police dusted for prints on both locks. When we eventually looked at the CCTV realised it was a waste of time they were wearing gloves.
I don't know anybody who burglarizes homes, but if I were to burglarize a home I would do the same. I would also probably watch a neighborhood a little first to make sure neighbors aren't too nosey, and see if there was pattern that you go out of the house for a certain amount of time each day for a certain period of time, so I would know how much time I have.
I would have called the police right way, even if I thought it was my brother, then I would have called my insurance company.
You need to check the twitter.
First, why didn't anyone tell me Squilly returned! This is the best part of MR today!
Okay...
Everyone else has done a fine job of picking apart the first post but what I didn't see is anyone pointing out that Squilly finally refers to the "business" that he was going to or got in on as "sketchy". I'm impressed that you finally admitted this so-called "business" is indeed sketchy. And I assume everyone knew about the "business". You aren't hard to track down from what I can tell.![]()
A bit more legit than being robbed 4 times and waiting almost 2 weeks to call the police.
Regardless, he has an alarm with a pad lock that has a pin (this idea is new to me) that he didn't arm.
I vote, a buddy, probably someone who really knew it would be incredibly easy to rob you not once, not twice, but four times is behind this.
View attachment 469546
Four times you'd go? If I went through insurance, the deductible would be more than the items lost.
You said you didn't arm the alarm at all for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.That's a concern of mine as well. If they didn't find anything from the consoles, maybe they were wearing gloves.
#1: thanks.
#2: slow business men paying brother $80k doesn't really add up.
#3: your signature makes sense now.
#4: first time we didn't arm the padlock. 2nd, 3rd and 4th time we did.
#5: probably.
You need to check the twitter.
You said you didn't arm the alarm at all for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.....
To be fair to Squilly, he has noted that there is an alarm on the house and some sort of combination padlock from garage to the house. At least that is how I understood it.
I don't mean to defend his other lapses in logic... but in this particular instance he seems to be consistent.
Yes, he has consistently said there was an alarm. He has been inconsistent with the times it was armed. He said it wasn't armed until the 4th purported robbery. This theory comes up between posts 1 and 25, or thereabout.
Admittedly he is not always clear, but in this case my understanding is that the alarm was not set until after the 3rd incident, but in this case we are talking about a padlock.
Though - as we both know - trying to find the logic in these threads is often an exercise in frustration. It's just that in this particular case I didn't find a disconnect. There were two things that needed arming...
I await the next instalment, however....
Wonderful news. Glad there nothing unclear about the number of times this person armed his alarm. Let it be clear, he's a teenager and somehow his parents aren't the voice of reason either, as it seems.![]()
I'm still calling this story an attention grab.
Wonderful news. Glad there nothing unclear about the number of times this person armed his alarm. Let it be clear, he's a teenager and somehow his parents aren't the voice of reason either, as it seems.![]()
I'm still calling this story an attention grab.
Well I would have called the police every time, and I don't know what your mom's deductible is, but it would be something I'd look into. First and foremost I wouldn't have/spend money on a security alarm that I didn't arm. So much for it deterring crime in your house.
You said you didn't arm the alarm at all for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.
My signature makes total sense, your lies do not. If you had any concern you wouldn't have waited 12 days to call the cops. I think this whole story is another attention grab.
----------
I do but I follow more companies than anything else so it gets lost there.
To be fair to Squilly, he has noted that there is an alarm on the house and some sort of combination padlock from garage to the house. At least that is how I understood it.
I don't mean to defend his other lapses in logic... but in this particular instance he seems to be consistent.
Yes, he has consistently said there was an alarm. He has been inconsistent with the times it was armed. He said it wasn't armed until the 4th purported robbery. This theory comes up between posts 1 and 25, or thereabout.
Sounds like a lonely guy looking for attention to me. Sad, isn't it....
.
Plus the fact that we didn't know when he'd be coming back. At first we thought it was my brother. Now we don't think it is. The burglaries were sporadic date wise though....
I'm afraid this is where you lose me. By definition, almost all burglaries are unpredictable and the whole point of an alarm system is to protect you from these unpredictable events. If you knew when the burglary was scheduled you wouldn't really need an alarm, eh?. To get robbed, and then decide to not use it because the dates are random defies logic. Which, to be fair, is more common than not in these threads.
As well, if you really did think it was your brother robbing you, then setting the alarm still makes sense. You would have a record of times and dates it was deactivated which could be compared to your brother's activities. You would then be able to confront him without police involvement (if you wished) or very quickly eliminated him as a suspect if the alarm was triggered when he was known to be else where.
As well, since each member of the household would have their own unique code it would eliminate (or confirm) each member - not just one.
Also, assuming you thought it was your brother, setting the alarm makes it more difficult for him. Regardless of who it was setting the alarm would have saved you completely from the last two break-ins and greatly abbreviated the 2nd.
I'm sorry you had to go through this but your family handled it badly, imho.
True. But we don't get notifications when someone enters, what door it was or when the alarm sounds. That's another fee.
Recently, my home was burglarized. We have an alarm system and pad lock on our garage door entrance which is the main entrance we use. Oddly, they came 4 times; once on the 29th of March, next on the 4th, then on the 8th and 9th of this month. My Xbox One got stolen on the 29th, PS4 stolen on the 4th, iPad Air and my brothers Xbox One on the 8th and my brothers sunglasses and they moved my TV from on top of a shelf to the floor of my bedroom on the 9th. They also tried busting into my brothers in wall safe (this is my brother with the sketchy overseas business) that absolutely no one except family knew about). For what it's worth, my iPad has 4G capabilities and is in lost mode but it's offline - I'd assume they took the SIM card out. On the 10th, we called the police and an investigation was started. We were questioned and had a decent idea of who it was.
Backing up to the 9th, the last burglary, my neighbor whom I've never met or talked to before saw an older car pull up to her house and a guy in a white shirt and jeans walk towards my house. Unfortunately, she didn't see if he walked out with anything. Going forward - the next day we get fingerprints collected. They don't find anything. A couple days later, my brother gets contacted from an old friend who has a history of stealing, just not from us. He told him he was fired from CVS, his place of work, for stealing cartons of cigarettes and that he's strapped for cash. We call the police and tell them ASAP, we give all the information we have on him: full name, phone #, Facebook... Just no address as we don't know where he lives exactly. The investigation is still ongoing and we have them collecting fingerprints tomorrow morning on my TV to see if they could find any matches. My main question is what should we do next? Wait it out? Could we get him for circumstantial evidence? Also, if found guilty, will he have to pay us back if the stuff was sold, which I assume it was? There have been no visits since the 9th. Our neighbor is willing to testify for us. Any advice is appreciated. Value is approx. $2k.