Building a device that is easy to repair, it actually makes products last longer, hence, less trash is created.
Which is different than recycling. At some point, the computer reaches EOL and is either trashed or recycled. I would argue that given the overall reliability of today's machines most are trouble free until EOL anyway so the repair design is not an issue. The main issue is battery life, IMHO, but even then by the time I have had a Mac whose battery was dead it was well past its ability to run the latest software. Even so, they could be replaced fairly cheaply by Apple if I wanted to.
YMMV.
Apple trades off upgradability for design, and is IMHO the right trade off given only a very tiny fraction of people would upgrade if it were possible. It's also a cost tradeoff, since replaceable components require sockets or connectors vs simply soldering them in. Reliability can become and issue if thermal cycles cause components to lose contact with the socket; although bad solder is the flip side but since the socket is soldered in you've added another potential failure point.
Anecdotally, I have upgrade a number of my computers over the years, but then again I am pretty tech savvy and like messing with stuff. Virtually everyone else I know simply buys a machine and uses it until it no longer meets their needs and replaces it; and have never needed more ram or disk space in their machine beyond that what it had originally.
Would it be nice if Macs were easily upgradable? Sure, but that shipped sailed long ago. In the end, manufacturers are moving to a non-upgradable and repair by replace major parts model for design and cost reasons.
I do not understand how soldering RAM, SSD and other components to the motherboard, makes a computer more recyclable.
It's a question of what materials are used and how easy they can be separated during recycling, and should be part of the product design from the start. It may simply be cheaper and more efficient to shred the mobo and separate the materials afterward. Minimizing the number of different materials may help in the sorting as well.
[doublepost=1549547026][/doublepost]
"Evil"? Oh well.
It's us customers who want their devices as sleek, thin, light, sturdy and capable as possible all at the same time. You can't have that AND have your device most modular.
Exactly. companies respond to customer tastes and try to produce products they want; which means unless they make one-offs the products are designed for the widest possible customer base, resulting in tradeoffs that leave a small fraction of the potential customers unhappy.
But of course it's all Tim Cook's fault...![]()
Yes, just like it's M-B fault that customers want tricked out Gelandewagens...