Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have M1 MBP with 8GM of ram. Am seriously considering an M1/M2 Mini to use alongside it because having too many Adobe apps open eats up the ram. Not just the ram but the scratch disk too, I got the 256GB model. I should probably save for the M1X instead.
 
I'm hearing a rumor that Apple will announce a Compromise Solution to ALL the App Store battles they've been going thru, & could continue to go thru, if they don't.

Have NO idea what that compromise solution might be (it's probably still being debated internally), but ...

good chance it gets Announced at this event.

You heard it here first !

Disclaimer: EE App Developer with grew up within walking distance to Apple; Apple has their Spies, I (now) have mine.
 
I have M1 MBP with 8GM of ram. Am seriously considering an M1/M2 Mini to use alongside it because having too many Adobe apps open eats up the ram. Not just the ram but the scratch disk too, I got the 256GB model. I should probably save for the M1X instead.
So basically you're saying you're considering buying a second machine to get more RAM and storage, cumulatively. ?

Unless you prefer getting a desktop, you're probably better off selling the M1 MBP and getting the M1 Pro MBP with 16-32 GB RAM and 512-1000 GB SSD.
 
Looking forward to the new form factor of the Mac mini! (Sometime this spring.)

I expect the M1-Max/Pro Mini to be in the same (spacegrey) case as the current Intel ones with a redesign scheduled for the refresh of the consumer version in the fall (the M2).

Wouldn't mind to be wrong, won't care much if I'm right, just want one and it want it now!!
 
I expect a new Mac Mini with the M1 Pro/Max simply to allow them to drop the remaining intel Mac Mini. The only reason they are still selling it is to accommodate those that need more than 16GB Ram. Don't expect any design change as some think there will be, not at this stage anyway.
Actually, it could be that the rumored new Mac mini design is for the M2 chip & there won't be a Mac mini model with the M1 Pro/Max.
 
At what point is the m1max delayed so much we move on to m2max?

M1 came out November 2020, and the same chip with more cores still hasn’t been released almost 18 months later..
Maybe it has to do with the chip shortage? Shortage of components. Apple did say it will take full 2 years to complete the transition.
 
Entry level MBP should not exist. Pro should mean Pro. The only entry level Mac portables should be MBA and MBA should get SD Card and MagSafe. Mac portables vs Pro Mac portables should be differentiated by double the number of USB-C ports, support for additional external monitors, computer thickness, much greater power + fans (to justify fans), high refresh displays and larger speakers, purely because you can fit a larger speaker in a bigger chassis. MBA should take an obvious performance hit over all Pro machines, so MBA are fast and MBP are exceedingly fast. Port variety should not take a hit, but USB-C port count should. This makes MBA a great machine with extra portability and MBP a truly amazing machine at higher prices and with some additional expandability and heft—for certain kinds of professionals who need all the power and expandability a Pro portable Mac deserves.
Agreed. What Apple should do is keep the MacBook Air M1 in the line-up as their entry-level MacBook offering, reducing the price to $899. The new MacBook design will slot in above at $1,099 or $1,199. It will have the M2 chip as well as all of the other rumored changes.

In addition, Apple should (not saying they will - but they SHOULD) bring on a 15" MacBook. This new family would eclipse the necessity for that 13" MacBook Pro configuration.

This would seriously quell our Apple product line-up OCD proclivities...
MacBook Air 13"
MacBook 13" & 15"
MacBook Pro 14" & 16"
Simple. Done.
 
Entry level MBP should not exist. Pro should mean Pro. The only entry level Mac portables should be MBA and MBA should get SD Card and MagSafe. Mac portables vs Pro Mac portables should be differentiated by double the number of USB-C ports, support for additional external monitors, computer thickness, much greater power + fans (to justify fans), high refresh displays and larger speakers, purely because you can fit a larger speaker in a bigger chassis. MBA should take an obvious performance hit over all Pro machines, so MBA are fast and MBP are exceedingly fast. Port variety should not take a hit, but USB-C port count should. This makes MBA a great machine with extra portability and MBP a truly amazing machine at higher prices and with some additional expandability and heft—for certain kinds of professionals who need all the power and expandability a Pro portable Mac deserves.

I think there’s still room for a lower cost, thin and light “Pro” laptop, but this rumor seems to rule out nearly everything that could meaningfully differentiate it from an Air. I ended up getting the 14” Pro mostly for the better display, but I could’ve been fine with the regular M1. An Air-size laptop with Pro-Motion and mini-LED would have fulfilled that.

Edit: If whatever this in between configuration ends up being, they should stop calling it a Pro unless it actually has features common with the Pro
 
Last edited:
Actually, it could be that the rumored new Mac mini design is for the M2 chip & there won't be a Mac mini model with the M1 Pro/Max.
Give me 32gb of ram and I’ll cut my losses at this point and get a 4 Core machine Just to be done with this purgatory
 
I expect the M1-Max/Pro Mini to be in the same (spacegrey) case as the current Intel ones with a redesign scheduled for the refresh of the consumer version in the fall (the M2).
I think that's unlikely, but we'll see soon enough.

I hope Apple will introduce some new colors of the Mac Mini. That would be awesome.
Well, I don't think they'd have rainbow colours with the M1 Pro/Max Mac mini. And to be honest, I don't think they'll do that with the M2 either.

I get the impression that Apple will continue to view the Mac mini as the more utilitarian machine, esp. since it's meant to be used with an external monitor, which is usually a third party one and which usually has iffy aesthetics. If you want the "lifestyle" rainbow colour options, you'll need to get the M1/M2 24" iMac or M2 MacBook Air. That is to say, I'm not convinced the Big iMac will have rainbow colour options either, although I think it's more likely than with the M1 Pro/Max Mac mini.
 
Entry level MBP should not exist. Pro should mean Pro. The only entry level Mac portables should be MBA and MBA should get SD Card and MagSafe. Mac portables vs Pro Mac portables should be differentiated by double the number of USB-C ports, support for additional external monitors, computer thickness, much greater power + fans (to justify fans), high refresh displays and larger speakers, purely because you can fit a larger speaker in a bigger chassis. MBA should take an obvious performance hit over all Pro machines, so MBA are fast and MBP are exceedingly fast. Port variety should not take a hit, but USB-C port count should. This makes MBA a great machine with extra portability and MBP a truly amazing machine at higher prices and with some additional expandability and heft—for certain kinds of professionals who need all the power and expandability a Pro portable Mac deserves.
Pro should mean pro!!? And what exactly does pro mean? Are we talking pro video editor, pro musician, pro vlogger, pro coder, pro creative writer, etc, etc. There will be pro’s of all variety using Apple laptops and desktop, and probably just as many people buying the ‘pro’ kit that don’t predominantly use their machines for work related tasks.

Apple needs to cater for many different users, pro and not pro. I’ve never known Apple to only offer one ‘pro’ machine. Get rid of the 13 inch and then the 14 inch becomes the ‘entry level’ machine!

My profession is coding, and for me the 13 inch with M1 is currently the best option for me. So there you go, a ‘pro’ who wants to keep the 13 inch MacBook Pro. And yes, I love the touchbar, especially when using the Xcode debugger!
 
Agreed. What Apple should do is keep the MacBook Air M1 in the line-up as their entry-level MacBook offering, reducing the price to $899. The new MacBook design will slot in above at $1,099 or $1,199. It will have the M2 chip as well as all of the other rumored changes.

In addition, Apple should (not saying they will - but they SHOULD) bring on a 15" MacBook. This new family would eclipse the necessity for that 13" MacBook Pro configuration.

This would seriously quell our Apple product line-up OCD proclivities...
MacBook Air 13"
MacBook 13" & 15"
MacBook Pro 14" & 16"
Simple. Done.
Not disagreeing with anyone, but I just noticed my toilet seat is a Laufen Pro. Not sure I have the qualifications to justify it, and I certainly don't use it for a living.
 
I have a sneaking suspicion the Mac Pro will stay intel for a few more years.
Apple must complete the transition to Apple Silicon by the end of the year, but I agree with you, I don’t see them dumping Intel chips right away for their pro stations. My bet is that by the end of the year all the line up will be offered with apple chips, including the Mac Pro, but there will remain a mac pro Intel option for a few years
 
You're right. It can't be just for spec updates. That would be laughable. Yet it's too early for the new Air or updated 13/14" MacBook Pro. Me thinks it's probably the larger iMac. Possibly the Mac Pro. The iMac Pro or Mac Pro could come at WWDC, as well. Every Mac that's announced following WWDC will likely have the M2 chip. My 2¢...
Yup, probably the 27" iMac and/or iMac Pro.
OTOH the M1 Macbook Air is more than a year old already, so it's not "too early" for an upgrade. But I do agree that Apple probably doesn't want the M2 chip to eclipse the M1 series on the 27" iMac/iMac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: asdfjkl;
Agreed. What Apple should do is keep the MacBook Air M1 in the line-up as their entry-level MacBook offering, reducing the price to $899. The new MacBook design will slot in above at $1,099 or $1,199. It will have the M2 chip as well as all of the other rumored changes.

In addition, Apple should (not saying they will - but they SHOULD) bring on a 15" MacBook. This new family would eclipse the necessity for that 13" MacBook Pro configuration.

This would seriously quell our Apple product line-up OCD proclivities...
MacBook Air 13"
MacBook 13" & 15"
MacBook Pro 14" & 16"
Simple. Done.
Yep, I still think the updated "Air" is really going to be just at MacBook and replace the 13" MBP. The current Air will stay in the lineup as the entry model. A 15" version of the MacBook would be fantastic for those who want the bigger screen without the need for the other bigger specs and price.
 
Gurman has been extremely unreliable in recent years. He is just guessing. He probably doesn't even know what is going on within his own household, much less what Apple is up to.
 
Entry level MBP should not exist. Pro should mean Pro. The only entry level Mac portables should be MBA and MBA should get SD Card and MagSafe. Mac portables vs Pro Mac portables should be differentiated by double the number of USB-C ports, support for additional external monitors,
What would make most sense is for Macs with "Pro" in the name to have M? Pro or better processors... which is also what would give them more ports, support for additional monitors, more RAM etc.

I think that, even with Intel Macs, the only reason the entry level 13" MacBook was called "MacBook Pro" was the (just) "MacBook" name had been taken by the 12" ultra-light MacBook. The range had also got a bit mussed up when the MacBook Air started out as a premium-priced ultra-mobile executive toy (impressive but expensive) vs. the (then) plasticky, chunky MacBook, and then morphed into the real entry-level "MacBook".

Replacing the first-gen M1 MBP, Air and Mini with all-new designs would be a good opportunity to rationalise the model names. Possibly making the Air replacement just "MacBook" if it can provide adequate power in an ultraportable/fanless form factor.

I had been holding out hope for the M2 Air to upgrade myself, but ultimately shrugged and went with the M1 Pro MBP.

The M2 Air isn't likely to offer the same sort of processing, GPU power or I/O as the M1 Pro/Max. It'll most likely have similar limitations on RAM, I/O and number of displays and the same/similar 4 performance + 4 economy + 8 GPU core configuration as the current M1 (a consequence of prioritising heat/battery life over speed), but just be incrementally faster all round. The M1 Pro/Max should still thrash it on multi-threaded workloads, graphics and GPU-based computing, anything needing more than 16GB RAM or extra I/O bandwidth. Unless Apple surprise us with a full range of M2, M2 Pro and M2 Max systems this year - but I'm not holding my breath.
 
  1. Apple has had a number of "spec update" Spring events. One can argue that only 2016 and 2021 had "new" products with all the other events being either new updates to existing products or new colors for existing products.
  2. Gurman is 85% accurate for 2022 and he had vastly more hits than misses in 2021, though he also has a fair bit of "TBD" rumors dependent on what the M2 Macs look like when they launch at the end of this year.
  3. iPad Air could very well be updated now since the current model is trailing the iPad mini as it lacks the A15, a 12MP front camera with Center Stage, Quad-LED True Tone flash and 5G.
  4. The 13.3" MacBook Pro has a reason to exist in the lineup at the moment because it is a bridge between the $999 MacBook Air and the $1999 MacBook Pro 14". I expect the M2 MacBook Air will be $1299-1399 due to having MiniLED (with the M1 sticking around at $899-999) so if the M2 MacBook Pro also has MiniLED, I could see it going to $1599 - still $400 cheaper than the 14" while still offering a more powerful (under sustained workloads) option to the MacBook Air.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.