Look for the follow-on Gurman story where he calls Apple a failure r being delays in this feature which Apple never announced.
If I don’t see Mr. Tim Cook not doing the in-stage presentation of Apple’s AR/VR headset. I’m not going to be interested in buying it. I only want him to do the demonstration live in person.I get that it is really hard to get excited about something that isn’t really defined, known, or understood well, but the overt antipathy is a bit of a mystery for me. I get that many have doubts on Apple’s ability to deliver a truly innovative device based on recent track-record, but I would like to think Apple’s contribution would be helpful to see the AR/VR sector develop and flourish… even if they are not the best OR whether you’re interested in buying it.
I think a big issue with VR headsets is that it further isolates people from reality / the real world. I can see them being used in some work functions, gaming and watching movies, but further removing yourself from the environment by wearing a masked set of goggles just seems antisocial. It’s bad enough that people are on their devices so much. Yes I’m old…I get that it is really hard to get excited about something that isn’t really defined, known, or understood well, but the overt antipathy is a bit of a mystery for me. I get that many have doubts on Apple’s ability to deliver a truly innovative device based on recent track-record, but I would like to think Apple’s contribution would be helpful to see the AR/VR sector develop and flourish… even if they are not the best OR whether you’re interested in buying it.
Given how great dictation has become in recent years, I'm surprised that anyone would care about typing in the air unless you just want a cool tech demo that no one would really use in the real world.
Apple's first mixed-reality headset may feature "in-air" typing capabilities and can be used independently without an accompanying iPhone, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
In the latest edition of his "Power On" newsletter, Gurman explained that Apple's headset is unlikely to require a paired iPhone, in contrast to the original Apple Watch. The device can purportedly be set up without an accompanying iPhone and download a user's content independently, including iCloud data. A data transfer from a user's iPhone upon setup will be an option rather than a requirement.
"In-air typing," Apple's method for text input using eye movements and hand gestures with the device, is apparently enabled on the latest internal prototypes. The feature is "finicky," Gurman warned, explaining that "you still may want to pair an iPhone to use its touch-screen keyboard... The hope within Apple is to make rapid improvements after the device is released."
Apple is still planning to unveil the first version of the headset, likely called "Reality Pro," at WWDC in June this year, with the device shipping toward the end of 2023 at the earliest. The company is also developing multiple other headset models for further in the future. There is a cheaper model with a lower-end display and processor components planned for launch at the end of 2024 or in 2025, likely under the "Reality One" name, as well as a second-generation Reality Pro headset.
The second-generation Reality Pro headset is apparently focused on performance improvements. While the first-generation model will contain the M2 chip alongside a secondary chip for AR and VR processing, it is apparently not powerful enough to output graphics at the level Apple wants. For example, FaceTime will only support realistic VR representations of just two people at a time, rather than everyone in a conference call, with the first-generation headset. The second-generation Reality Pro could have a variant of the M3 or M4 chip to bolster its graphics capabilities, Gurman said.
Article Link: Gurman: Apple Headset Could Feature 'In-Air' Typing for Text Input, No iPhone Pairing Required
I'm old as well and remember when adults said the same thing about kids like me wearing Walkman headphones in public.I think a big issue with VR headsets is that it further isolates people from reality / the real world. I can see them being used in some work functions, gaming and watching movies, but further removing yourself from the environment by wearing a masked set of goggles just seems antisocial. It’s bad enough that people are on their devices so much. Yes I’m old…
Given how great dictation has become in recent years
I can't see any reason why one wouldn't be able to watch movies. But what resolution would they have to be in order to be a decent viewing experience? Is 4K large enough -- perhaps not? Maybe 8K??Can I watch movies with this device? If so, I’ll buy it instantaneously.
Sounds like it would be heavier than consumers would want with that kind of processing power needed. Some thought this would a iPhone replacement? Wait and see if it worth it, is what all of us should do.The second-generation Reality Pro headset is apparently focused on performance improvements. While the first-generation model will contain the M2 chip alongside a secondary chip for AR and VR processing, it is apparently not powerful enough to output graphics at the level Apple wants. For example, FaceTime will only support realistic VR representations of just two people at a time, rather than everyone in a conference call, with the first-generation headset. The second-generation Reality Pro could have a variant of the M3 or M4 chip to bolster its graphics capabilities, Gurman said.
you mean like how the second generation iPhone was $400 cheaper than the first generation?And putting out a cheaper lower res on in the future does not make any sense. Is seems with this tech you are either fully immersed in it or you are not.
How about if the straps come in a variety of colors? Volt Yellow, perhaps?ok, let's throw some new rumors at this thing to hype it up - what features will it bring that compell me to spend 3k …
"Use the new VR-XXX instead of an inflatable sex doll. Fun times with the celebrity of your choice! Your imagination is the only limit!"ok, let's throw some new rumors at this thing to hype it up
Agree. I guess this isn't marketed toward me, but I do not see the infatuation with VR in most cases. Maybe they are going to push it towards more like work-related things (medical field, etc.)Sorry but there is not one aspect of this headset that interests me. Not one. Each new leak does nothing to entice me to want this. If you are interested, enjoy, but I just have no desire to strap this to my head.
They haven’t even revealed it yet, chill.Sorry but there is not one aspect of this headset that interests me. Not one. Each new leak does nothing to entice me to want this. If you are interested, enjoy, but I just have no desire to strap this to my head.