Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sorry but there is not one aspect of this headset that interests me. Not one. Each new leak does nothing to entice me to want this. If you are interested, enjoy, but I just have no desire to strap this to my head.
How about if it works when completely under water? It looks like a snorkeling mask, so it would not be much different.

I hope everyone buys one, so Apple can eventually make one that just looks like glasses.
 
I was thinking about an interface like this the other night. They could use the sensor data from (or add new electrodes to) an Apple Watch to improve the keyboard accuracy, on top of whatever is being done in the headset. Then, a few years later, maybe you could type in-air with just a watch as well.
 
I'd rather buy an apple car than apple headset... maybe they know what they are doing but I doubt it. Will have to see if there is some magical feature I can't think of right now. I was hoping by 2023 stuff like this would be contact lenses 😂
Yep, I want to replace my car every 2 to 3 years because it is no longer supported. That's me.
 
A supposedly multi-thousand dollar headset, and it's already underperforming to Apple's wishes in regards to graphics. Ouch.
Yeah that line caught me by surprise too. Gotta wonder what areas it’s underperforming outside of VR chat… With an M2 chip, this headset should technically be the most powerful standalone headset on the market.

You also gotta wonder (assuming this rumor is true) if Apple plans for this headset to be a more limited production, and if the launch won’t be until late 2023 then why not do one of the following to offset the performance issues:

1. Since there will apparently be a waste mounted battery compartment, why not make it a little bigger and move the SOC into that unit? That should allow them more space to fit in an M2 Pro which should give them a graphical power boost.

Or

2. Just use an M3 since the headset won’t launch until M3 season anyways… The fact that this headset will be a more limited production should prevent it from biting into the 3nm supply too much.

Just my .2 but it seems dumb to launch something that is already not meeting performance expectations… Sure doesn’t sound good for long term owners. In fact, you gotta wonder what the average ownership for these headsets will be. I’m thinking 3-5 years.
 
i call bull sheet on that.
Gurman could make Elon Musk blush with these predictions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ececlv
Need the graphics and games!
Most current AR commercial usage is professional. Example doing AR medical surgery.

In fact most of the AR examples that I saw Apple involved with were using AR to provide additional information so you could experience more realistic examples with varied educational topics. I know everyone got exciting with Ready Player One, but who would buy something this expensive and play games? This rumor suggests Apple is trying to make it mimic some iPhone abilities at a much higher cost and size increase.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kanon14
I can't recall any other brand-new Apple product having so much known ("known") about the limitations Apple is disappointed in and how they plan to correct it in future years.
 
Sorry but there is not one aspect of this headset that interests me. Not one. Each new leak does nothing to entice me to want this. If you are interested, enjoy, but I just have no desire to strap this to my head.
I am going to take a "Wait and See' attitude, but yeah, I don't either. I also make a rule to never buy first gen anything.
 
Probably the biggest hurdle is how bulky the AR/VR goggle is. If it isn’t bulky it becomes Apple Reality Pro FTW 🕺
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanon14
There are so many problems with this. So many. It’s hard to see it being successful. The rumours suggest such a haphazard product development strategy.
 
I get that it is really hard to get excited about something that isn’t really defined, known, or understood well, but the overt antipathy is a bit of a mystery for me. I get that many have doubts on Apple’s ability to deliver a truly innovative device based on recent track-record, but I would like to think Apple’s contribution would be helpful to see the AR/VR sector develop and flourish… even if they are not the best OR whether you’re interested in buying it.
There’s an antipathy, I believe, because it’s further evidence of Apple‘s decline in some people’s eyes. From an innovative market leader which is conservative in its product lines, to a company which iterates the same product with minor improvements and now purveys in gimmick products that seem to be very poorly thought out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Todhunter
The rumored feature set is terrible. Just focus on bringing real keyboards and real iPhones into the VR/AR environment, so people can still use those with a headset. Include a set of hand held controllers to use when not at a desk. Not everything can or should be a finger tracked gesture in the air. If it comes out as rumored it's definitely looking like a wait for the second or 3rd gen type of device.
 
There’s an antipathy, I believe, because it’s further evidence of Apple‘s decline in some people’s eyes. From an innovative market leader which is conservative in its product lines, to a company which iterates the same product with minor improvements and now purveys in gimmick products that seem to be very poorly thought out.
There's also antipathy from people who have used VR devices, understand their shortfalls and recognize that Apple isn't even attempting to address them (IF the rumors are true). From my perspective they are pursuing an idealized of VR that you can only hold when you haven't experienced it. Hopefully it's just unfounded speculation from "analysts" that haven't actually experienced VR, not Apple themselves.
 
you mean like how the second generation iPhone was $400 cheaper than the first generation?
Or how the iPad Mini was introduced two and a half years after the big iPad at an almost $200 discount?
Or the “Series 1” Watch that was introduced at the same time as the second generation, and was quite a bit cheeper?
Or the HomePod Nini…
iPod Mini/nano/shuffle…
Literally every product category Apple has entered in in the last 20 years, they start with a very expensive first generation, usually followed by a scaled down cheeper version that takes off a couple years later that has all of the essentials.
The first iPhone sold about 6 million units… The second one sold 30 million.
The first Apple Watch was a decent enough success… But the cheaper series one and series 2 were really what caused them to absolutely dominate the market.
The $350 HomePod was a failure when it comes to sales… While the HomePod mini is literally the best selling individual smart speaker of the last couple years.
Did you bother to read the second sentence? Seems you did not.

Name one of the products you stated above where the main feature of the product, and a crucial one at that, was degraded in quality.

I will stand by what I said. Making a cheaper but lower quality screen where the quality of the screen and its immersion into the VR is its most crucial and main component. If you are not fully immersed its a bad product.

No one wants to see holes in the matrix. It' ruins the experience.
 
"In-air typing," Apple's method for text input using eye movements and hand gestures with the device, is apparently enabled on the latest internal prototypes. The feature is "finicky," Gurman warned, explaining that "you still may want to pair an iPhone to use its touch-screen keyboard... The hope within Apple is to make rapid improvements after the device is released."
Sounds like an ergonomic nightmare, actually. It's not okay to have an arm-fatiguing touchscreen Mac, but it's okay to have to wave your arms around in the air?
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Sorry but there is not one aspect of this headset that interests me. Not one. Each new leak does nothing to entice me to want this. If you are interested, enjoy, but I just have no desire to strap this to my head.
Maybe you're 100% right.
But you also 100% sound like those people hating on the first iPhone before it was announced.
Wait, maybe it will suck, maybe it'll great, maybe it'll great for a specific kind of people...
 
I think a big issue with VR headsets is that it further isolates people from reality / the real world. I can see them being used in some work functions, gaming and watching movies, but further removing yourself from the environment by wearing a masked set of goggles just seems antisocial. It’s bad enough that people are on their devices so much. Yes I’m old…
Might help for those with anxiety. Sometimes the real world is tough on certain people and people need to space out.
 
Unfortunately. This product looks like it’s years away from being a fully functional
Price affordable product.
Hopefully mark Gurnans source is incorrect
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanon14
I'm still not convinced that this will end up becoming a mainstream succes. It makes me wonder how many good features and necessary bug fixes Apple would have been able to bring to iOS and macOS if all the engineering and design capacity was invested there.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: wanha and kanon14
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.