This should be setting off alarm bells among the analysts over Apple's decision to move Mac entirely over to Apple Silicon. Sure, the M1 showed great performance numbers, but the bigger problem—or so was implied by Apple—with Intel's chips was evolution cadence: they were slow in delivering new, faster chips. Well… not sure what should then be said about Apple Silicon! Intel is not sitting still. AMD is not sitting still. Both have ramped up power and efficiency, although, no, still not to M1/M2 points, but another generation and they'll be there. Meanwhile, Apple has been pulling shenanigans like single-channel SSD.
This isn't a production problem on the chassis side, clearly evidenced by the fact that the rumors aren't saying the chassis are going to change on MBP and mini and Apple is selling those now still with M1 chips… it is a design/production problem on the Apple Silicon design front. And that is highly troubling, or should be, for watchers of such things. It completely undercuts Apple's entire "narrative"/reasons for shifting entirely to their own chip production.
(For example: if 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros still existed with 11th/12th-gen Intel processors, they'd be highly competitive in the PC marketplace and selling like crazy, even IF they weren't as fast as the Apple Silicon counterparts. And a 12th gen Intel mini would actually be worth the asking price of the 2018 Intel 8th gen mini Apple is spitefully still selling; the resources needed to do the engineering to go between an 8th gen and a 12th gen Intel board should be "trivial"… as evidenced by all the crap PC manus figured it out, yearly.)