By mid November "users complain of screen burn in due to persistent always on widgets on iPhone 14 Pro lockscreen"
More important than all that is notifications (texts, missed calls, etc).Looking forward to the always on display. Having weather, battery % would be useful to have Without needing to touch your phone
If it's possible at 10Hz, add it as a feature for the 13 line and let the user decide if the possible hit in battery life is worth it. The way that Apple optimizes everything, I doubt it would be a problem.Small correction to the article: IPhone 13 Pro’s Promotion display CAN’T go as low as 1Hz, at most 10Hz. That makes the always on display not feasible for the 13 Pro phones.
I'm curious: why do you have no interest in this feature? Serious question. Because I'm of the mind that I can't wait for this and I've been clamoring for it for years, but I'm always one to weigh the merits of the other side as well...
The watch isn't a watch without the feature. Cannot fathom someone's reasoning behind turning it off. Zero benefit to turning it off. You probably still believe it drains the battery, which it does not.
They are gonna probably feature their own communication chips soon, like the 5G Modem, maybe they will have something else for satellite supportGimme the satellite texting feature and SOLD
It irritates me to no end when people turn off features that are meant to be on, without any justification whatsoever.Every time I go to look at my watch it turns on and i can see it fine. I really do not have a need for it to be always on. I appreciate others will love the feature, but some you like, some you don't. And this one I have no interest in - just the way I use my devices I guess.
Maybe with the phone it will be a bit different I guess, since I have to tap to view anything at the moment. So maybe I'll give it a try. But it's certainly not a feature I'm excited about.
It is for me. I don't have to use my watch the way you use your watch - or even the way Apple intends for people to use their watches. It has nothing to do with battery, and never have I mentioned it's because of battery drain. As I stated above, for me and the way I use my watch, it's on every time I want to look at it. That's all I need.
Again, as I said above, I appreciate others will be excited about this feature. I am not, and I'm just voicing my opinion. I respect the fact it's a feature that will be helpful for you and I wouldn't try to persuade you any other way. This is exactly why Apple allow features to be switched on and off. Personalise and enjoy your device the way you want to.
It’s more than possible. Android devices with OLED screens have been running AOD’s with screens for a long time starting with most being 60hz … The difference on battery gain between 1hz and 10hz would be tiny in the overall scheme of things - indeed as already stated AOD was planned to be implemented for the 13 pro line. The only reason Apple will not implement the feature on the 13 Pro / Pro Max is to give the 14 pro range a false advantage. We know apple likes to withhold features from older products which can handle them fine, simply to make upgrading more desirable. If Apple truly cared about their ‘eco’ ness, they would add as many software features and AOD is a software feature, to their existing capable products and reduce the requirement of people to purchase newer phones. But of course this doesn’t make sense where $ is the true motivator of these kind of decisions.If it's possible at 10Hz, add it as a feature for the 13 line and let the user decide if the possible hit in battery life is worth it. The way that Apple optimizes everything, I doubt it would be a problem.
No you’re absolutely right. I overlooked that, and the comparison is between the two Max’s. Absolutely.On the contrary, consumers will see the 14 Max as the largest iPhone for $300 less than the 14 Pro Max. I doubt people would be directly comparing the 14 Max with the 14 Pro as they have different screen size.
For us geeks, we might tabulate the price to the features we get, and thus make the conclusion that the Pro is a better deal. The lay consumers have a much more basic decision path, ie. how big is the screen for the dollar. And the 14 Max will also be battery life champion with the tried and tested A15 and 60Hz screen.
So Apple, again, managed to catch both customer segments. For the lay consumers, Apple will be able to charge them $100 with cost saving more by offering a larger screen and previous gen chip, while Apple manage to upsell people like you to pay even more money with dazzling specs and features with the Pro models.
For me it’s battery life. I really enjoy not having to worry about my watch needing a charge everyday. Also battery health: Watch will last longer.I'm curious: why do you have no interest in this feature? Serious question. Because I'm of the mind that I can't wait for this and I've been clamoring for it for years, but I'm always one to weigh the merits of the other side as well...
It certainly does use more battery. I’ve had AW6 since release date.The watch isn't a watch without the feature. Cannot fathom someone's reasoning behind turning it off. Zero benefit to turning it off. You probably still believe it drains the battery, which it does not.
Lightning 2.0. Now transferring at same speed as usb-C.I wonder if they would be daring enough to try to put in another peripheral to replace the usb c 😂
Are you implying that sales of the different iPhone 14 models will plummet?I mean it is still pretty boring in the scheme of things. AOD is nothing new (and the 13 pro series should be able to run it too but apple won't allow it). Android has been doing AOD for years...
No, I was saying it is nothing special in terms of upgrades and that AOD is nothing new (except to apple users).Are you implying that sales of the different iPhone 14 models will plummet?
It irritates me to no end when people turn off features that are meant to be on, without any justification whatsoever.
You don't have a use case.Justified it for MYSELF with MY uses.
My use case differs from yours, so there's no reason why it should irritate you. Nothing says the feature is 'meant to be on'. That's why there are options to switch features off!
Yep, the fact that it was on to begin with.Nothing says the feature is 'meant to be on'.
That's not why. It's because lawyers have the final say at Apple, not engineers.That's why there are options to switch features off!
You don't have a use case.
Yep, the fact that it was on to begin with.
That's not why. It's because lawyers have the final say at Apple, not engineers.
If you had a reason it would be fine. But you don't.It doesn't matter who has the final say, the option is there for people to use.
Sorry I don't use my handset the way you want me to!
If you had a reason it would be fine. But you don't.
I guess my concept of boring is the opposite of people excited to purchase. While we know a lot of the hardware details and a lot of the software details we still don’t really know how Apple is going to combine these, and that remains exciting to me… So I’m not bored at all.No, I was saying it is nothing special in terms of upgrades and that AOD is nothing new (except to apple users).