First point, he said the mac mini is going to be an important part of the lineup moving forward... It just hasn't been released yet.
Second point he is talking about merging the touchscreen from iPads and Macs.
Third point... They released the iMac Pro last year and are still working on the Mac Pro.
Fourth point.. He says they have stuff in the pipeline that isn't ready yet, I take this to mean glasses, but I could be way off.
How are you not able to use current Apple products for work?
I will give you the battery and keyboard problems were/are shady.
Id like to see a more reliable source than what you referenced for Apple being able to read iMessages and such.
Your last point about law enforcement is nonsensical. You cut and pasted bits and pieces to fit your narrative. Yes, they will provide them what they can when warrants are provided. They will not just go willy nilly unlocking phones so law enforcement can get in (and they don't have the ability to).
Were reaching/have reached a peak with this stuff. We are not going to get an earth shattering product like the iPhone every couple of years. I would argue that the watch is pretty earth shattering on its own and they seem to be absolutely everywhere. At this point it is all refinements, which I am perfectly happy with. I just want products that work well together and are easy to use.
[doublepost=1527859922][/doublepost]
I don't think software guys are being defensive about it. They are just pointing out that this is a software event so if new hardware is not revealed it is not a surprise.
Last year we got new hardware at the keynote and in typical macrumors fashion, everyone bitched and moaned about what was released anyway.
The Mac Mini is clearly not important because they have let it languish for years - the only changes have made, made it less useful for anyone...
Mac Pro was too little too late (except for a
very narrow range of Pros) and there is still no replacement - that alone shows they don't care about the Pro market - and that's ok, but be
honest so that pros can plan to migrate over (especially after the disaster that was Final Cut X).
They dropped their (semi) pro Aperture, so that don't care about
that pro market.
The Macbook Pro focus on thinness and a touchbar over battery life and ports. The latter two are important aspects for the engineeres and even the business people in the companies I work with (requiring a bag of dongles is a step backwards). I need a laptop for my work, but the step from a 2013 to a 2017 rMBP is hardly compelling as they are severely compromised in terms of their choice of CPU whilst they've increased the price by a significant factor. I can afford any laptop - but I don't like feeling like TC is taking me for a ride...
I won't go into the law enforcement aspect, but I have it on good authority that there are a lot of more recent convenient "mistakes" (dropping number of rounds for hashing etc) and the push to iCloud (over local backups) which is most definitely not secure (by design).
People bitched and moaned because there releases are no longer compelling. The 2011 MBA and 2012/2013 rMBP releases were fantastic - good machines with good value for money. That has been lacking for
years now and the new releases are all severely compromised (Macbook One - with
ONE USB port that also is needed to charge the anemic machine. Instead we get new programming languages (Swift), some new iTunes integration, music services, TV shows and services, iPad
"Pros", Pencils that are arbitrarily limited to
iPad Pros for market reasons - Apple knows how to follow the money, but TC is lying when he says he cares about the Pro market, because I have seen no indication of that since 2013...