So Apple tells us there coming to make it all okay? Tired of pre-announcements as to keep consumers on the hook.
Sounds fine. Doesn’t need a keynote.And the thousands of new API’s introduced that will enable new types of uses for Apple devices, yes yay.
Developers?Everything with Apple now is “later, later, later”. Then what’s the point of this conference?
You know the focus is developers, right? Why should there be something more than software?Nobody makes them do a keynote. IMO, if they choose to do one, there should be something more than new APIs and OS stability/performance fixes.
Summing up the rumors:Sounds like this will be the most boring WWDC ever.
Everything with Apple now is “later, later, later”. Then what’s the point of this conference?
As a flop I meant the keynote, not the conference.Uhhh... why? It’s a software conference, and this is another year like snow leopard back in the day. It’s not and never was geared toward people who just want shiny things to dazzle them. Also, how can a software conference be a flop? It’s a seminar, not a movie.
I still have to see anyone make a compelling case why anyone – from an end-user perspective – should want that.Apple could reveal its reported plans to allow iOS apps to run on Macs as early as this year.
What has he lied about?
Can't wait for the charging mat. Looking forward to use it with my iPhone 7.So that's what we've got to look forward to. A stable version of iOS and a charging mat.
1. Iris graphics is dead. All ultrabooks are either UHD620 or MX150.Intel also haven't announced a successor to the CPU used in the non touch bar MacBook Pro - the 15w i5-7260U with Iris Graphics. And as already mentioned there's also no successor to the 5w Y series on the horizon. This line is in most danger of being superseded by an ARM CPU if the Marzipan rumours.
Those CPUs could also power an improved MacBook Air, or Mac Mini, although the i5-8250U has been out since late last year. It's easy to put that aside though as a quad core CPU up against dual core ones in most other 13" models would have looked wrong.
The CPUs for the Touchbar powered Macs are launched if not already available and the G series Intel i5-8305G and i7-8705G look strong contenders for some sort of product in a 15" MacBook Pro range (with or without touch bar perhaps).
The gap between the 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pros was just 9 months - from October 2016 to June 2017 when there was a super upgrade of MacBook Pros and iMacs. Waiting until October this year for the MacBooks suggests something is going on - after all the gap goes from 9 months at best to potentially 15 months from the 2017 to 2018 models - last time that sort of thing happened Intel messed up with their Broadwell CPUs. Here's a call-back to an old Mark Gurman article from 2016.
This time the delay could be:
1. Waiting for Intel to launch 15w parts with Iris Graphics and/or 5w parts.
2. Apple urgently redesigning the MacBook Pro in light of keyboardgate (as nobody is calling it) ahead of what could have been a proper redesign after the 4th version of the 2016 design.
3. Knock-on due to work on modular Mac Pro/iMac Pro.
4. Work on ARM Mac
5. Waiting on suitable AMD mobile VEGA GPU because 500X is unsuitable?
Yes, some of these points are model specific but Apple may want to launch everything at once.
Believe me, if Tim Cook starts talking about macOS living another double life (a call back to Steve Jobs at the beginning of the PPC to Intel transition) all bets are off.
Waiting a little longer until the traditional October time frame for hardware releases will be just about ok if these changes do end up being game changing (eg bigger screen sizes, case redesigns to fix the keyboards, MBA going full retina etc) rather than spec bumps.
While I would say there's reasons for the laptops to be updated later there's probably no real reason for delaying iMacs assuming Apple want to use the Coffee Lake desktop CPUs that area already out. They might also be hoping to use the i5-8305G in the 21.5" model which could delay it to the same day as the MacBook Pros or be waiting on the next major macOS release in October for some reason.
For headless devices, though, any late release of the iMac leaves it that bit closer to the release of the modular Mac Pro and gives Mac Mini fans that bit longer to discuss the various merits of the existing Haswell system.
One thing Apple could be waiting on is the Xeon E entry level CPUs - the names of which got leaked a few days ago. Perhaps Apple are starting to prepare for ARM Macs by going Xeon with their proper Intel Pro products?
Mobile 6 core Xeons are already available.
At least I guess ...they can't disappoint me then?[/QUOTE said:Never underestimate Apple's ability to disappoint.
"Cook told one Mac mini fan in an email that, “while it is not time to share any details, we do plan for Mac mini to be an important part of our product line going forward.”"
""We don't believe in sort of watering down one for the other," Cook told the Sydney Morning Herald in an interview published on Thursday. "Both are incredible. One of the reasons that both of them are incredible is because we pushed them to do what they do well. And if you begin to merge the two ... you begin to make trade offs and compromises."
Well High Sierra and modern Macs are filled with compromises for small gains in integration.
"February 28, 2017 9:46 am PST by Juli Clover During a Q&A session at today's shareholder meeting held at Apple's Cupertino campus, Apple CEO Tim Cook reassured investors that Apple is still very much focused on its professional customers and has plans to "do more" in the pro area."
BS
Tim Cook 2016:
"We've got great innovation in the pipeline. ...
We are going to give you things you can't live without that you just don't know you need today. That has always been the objective of Apple. To do things that really enrich people's lives. That you look back on and you wonder how did I live without this."
I've not seen anything particularly innovative (also: I want stuff that I can use for work, not more emojis or watches)
Denying widespread problems with iPhone batteries, Macbook butterfly keyboards.
“Conversations which take place over iMessage and FaceTime are protected by end-to-end encryption so no one but the sender and receiver can see or read them,”.. .but:![]()
https://thehackernews.com/2016/01/apple-icloud-imessages.html
Tim Cook stance on privacy - but in the backchannels (Apple executive Lisa Jackson - TC right-hand person):
"Thousands of times every month, we give governments information about Apple customers and devices, in response to warrants and other forms of legal process.
"We have a team that responds to those requests 24 hours a day."
She added: "Strong encryption does not eliminate Apple’s ability to give law enforcement meta-data or any of a number of other very useful categories of data."
The email was sent on December 20 2015, as Apple was preparing its public opposition to the UK Investigatory Powers Bill, which required it to maintain keys to encrypted devices and certain online messenger services. "
I don't think software guys are being defensive about it. They are just pointing out that this is a software event so if new hardware is not revealed it is not a surprise.Having a 90-120 minute keynote that features some new hardware releases doesn't take anything away from the entire weeks worth of software development conferences and workshops. No need get defensive about possible hardware announcements stealing a little thunder. Most everything AFTER the SHORT keynote is all about you.
Jeeze, software guys are defensive.