My apologies if this has already been posted, but enabling two-step authentication doesn't remove your security questions.
Apple says it does when you turn it on.
My apologies if this has already been posted, but enabling two-step authentication doesn't remove your security questions.
My apologies if this has already been posted, but enabling two-step authentication doesn't remove your security questions.
Nice little read here. I guess we can say "You're locking it wrong." is the new "You're holding it wrong." catch phrase for the year. Classic Apple stuff folks.
http://www.ibtimes.com/apples-blame...oto-breach-wont-fix-its-trust-problem-1676436
"This is a distinction that customers dont care about. They will hear, in effect, Its not our fault hackers guessed your password. This blame-the-user mentality is reminiscent of the 2010 release of iPhone 4. The phones antenna was exposed externally, and gripping the phone a certain way might cause your call to disconnect. Apple dismissed loads of complaints with what became a party line amounting to a joke: Youre holding it wrong.
This is 2014s Youre holding it wrong. Blogger Michael Arrington thinks this is a big problem going forward. Even if Apple fixes the problem, or has fixed the problem with the patch they just released, theyre still screwed, The damage, the massive damage, has already been done. Because everyone now understands that their phones arent secure. Even things they thought they deleted are vulnerable. Thats something that will haunt Apple for a decade.
Would it be better if Apple prevented restores/downloads of iPhone backups without a trusted device being present?
Hacked friends or family. Personal assists, business associates, or stolen off business documents by some low-level employee. Social engineering of the person or people who would know the address.
Even your local Apple Genius could help one of these celebrities or their assistants & they would have access to all of their info.
It seems clear these tools are being used by hackers to access iCloud backups, so I don't think it's just limited to opinion. I'm not sure what the issue is with the headline -- it doesn't imply that it was the method of attack for the celebrity hacking, just that it's a phenomenon that's ongoing. What is misleading?
This is why it was a terrible idea to force IOS users to use iCloud for contacts info. I never wanted anything in iCloud, including contacts. Let us sync contacts locally, in iTunes.
Screw iCloud.
But there still is an inherent flaw with icloud in that it can be brute forced
it might be 'better' from a security point of view but one of the major reasons for iPhone backups is warranty replacements. which would not be trust devices. and in some cases the trusted device is totally non operational. thus mucking up the owner getting their stuff back efficiently. especially if they need a trusted iPhone to make the new iPhone trusted
----------
The Fappening 2014. Never forget
Apple also probably forgot about encrypting authentication tokens on the user's computer.
The Forensic Edition of EPPB allows downloading of iCloud data without the password of the Apple ID, because the Forensic Edition will obtain the authentication tokens used by the computer for iCloud syncing.
Apple should encrypt the authentication tokens itself with AES-256.
I don't think we are getting the same conclusion. The hackers are getting the persons ID AND password somehow, someway. Then they are getting someone's backup using their ID AND password (or resetting them). This isn't a security hole. This is a feature overlook. But yes, needs to be fixed.
Sigh. No.
The 2-factor authentication Apple has set up works specifically to stop people from guessing/researching/finding answers to your "security questions" (by actually eliminating all security questions). This stops them from resetting your password, thus gaining access to your iCloud account, thus gaining access to your iPhone backups.
Therefore it WOULD in fact have stopped the iCloud backup "hacks" conducted, at least those conducted by the n00bs on AnonIB. They are specifically laying out the method they use in step by step instructions. They are not haxxors, they are not the NSA, they are not brute forcing passwords, they do not have skillz. They are just researching info on people, then going to appleid.apple.com and resetting passwords.
Jeez. Fact check anyone?
Would it be better if Apple prevented restores/downloads of iPhone backups without a trusted device being present? Yes. Would that step be necessary to stop the "hackers" in question? No. These guys are not even script kiddies. They are literally just filling out fields on a web site to get these pics.
In short, ignore the implied "the sky is falling" in this post.
DO enable 2-factor authentication on your apple id.
DO also tell Apple to increase their 2-factor authentication to prevent even more things.
But do not imagine that your iCloud account is somehow going to be magically hacked even if you set-up 2-factor authentication (and are smart enough to use a longish, randomish password).
This is why it was a terrible idea to force IOS users to use iCloud for contacts info. I never wanted anything in iCloud, including contacts. Let us sync contacts locally, in iTunes.
Screw iCloud.
All software companies have to find a balance between security and ease of use for the everyday person. People like us on sites like this understand the need for security more than casual software/hardware users.
No matter what Apple does they can't patch up stupid
encrypting backups would certainly be a good thing but it would not have any bearing on the particular vulnerability being discussed here. restoring from a backup would still be authenticated just by the password.I suspect by year end, Photos in iCloud, iCloud Backups, everything, will all be encrypted.
it's far from being that easy. 2-factor authentication as a default?There are plenty of authentication systems that could be used to prevent this.
Apple has 2-factor. That should have been the default, instead of optional.
A simple phone call to reset passwords would be a lot less tempting for hackers than a hacker-friendly web reset.
Apple also could have used TouchID.
And so on.
Lots of security holes here, including weak password reset verification questions.
You mean weak answers to password reset verification questions?![]()
I believe it was actress Selma Hayek who got her email hacked. Someone thought it clever to try variations of her name on all the free email systems (firstnamelastname@, lastnamefirstname@ and so on). They hit one that worked and asked for her birthdate, which you can get off IMDB, and the security question 'my first oscar nomination' also something very easy to get. Was the email provider hacked to get her emails. nope. she was the victim of idiocy either by herself or an assistant
No matter what Apple does they can't patch up stupid
There are plenty of authentication systems that could be used to prevent this.
Apple has 2-factor. That should have been the default, instead of optional.
A simple phone call to reset passwords would be a lot less tempting for hackers than a hacker-friendly web reset.
Apple also could have used TouchID.
And so on.