Is it worth re-buying a 360 for ?
why do you say it looks amazing? Looks (graphics) just like any good game that has come out in the last year or two.
why do you say it looks amazing? Looks (graphics) just like any good game that has come out in the last year or two.
Umm interesting stuff, I will have to see it in action then. Maybe, I'm just spoiled w/ Uncharted on the PS3, but I will see this new Halo game in action to compare.AA, highly contrasting HDR, fixed fps with no drops, almost no loading, no texture pop-ins, nice textures and animation, lots of shaders and visual effects that shouldn't be possible on 6 year old hardware.
AA, highly contrasting HDR, fixed fps with no drops, almost no loading, no texture pop-ins, nice textures and animation, lots of shaders and visual effects that shouldn't be possible on 6 year old hardware.
It's 720p;I happen to agree with Carlanga somewhat. I have the game and the first thing I noticed was that it is not true 720p HD. True 720p games have a more crisp, sharp look (DOA5 or Tekken Tag 2, for example). IMO, the graphics in the game are good, but nothing incredible. There are other games made by third party companies (like the ones I mentioned from Namco and Team Ninja) that are 60fps and run in true 720p HD, and have the same level of graphics that Halo 4 has, or better. The games I mentioned, however, contain very enclosed environments as they're fighting games, so that may be why they're able to increase the quality of the other aspects.
It's 720p;
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-07-343-confirms-halo-4-is-native-720p
And the reason why it's not as sharp is because it's using AA, an edge-smoothing effect virtually no console games use.
But the game is ultimately an empty, deflating, even dull experience. Stranded on a distant planet, the Chief attempts to defeat an ancient alien-who, naturally wants to destroy Earth. The graphics are fine, but not compelling. The gameplay is solid, but unoriginal. The campaign is short, repetitive, and outright incoherent. As a video game, it's safe, flabby, and uninspired: everything the original Halo wasn't.
I'm enjoying the game more than the previous instalments, but I do totally agree on the convoluted but ultimately dull story. It is short, it is repetitive, it's nothing we haven't done before.
I just like the environments and co-op gameplay.
I'm mostly into Halo for coop, not multiplayer.![]()
Same, it's my fave console FPS co-op game. The very reason I bought an Xbox and 360.
What happened to that co-op thread of yours? Do you still keep it updated?
Agree with most of what was written here. My first reaction (early on) was it was like playing through Abrams' Star Trek, with all the lens flare effects; and much of the graphics improvements are related to that. Most Halo games have quite simple, bland environments (in particular the Forerunner architecture) so might not necessarily be the most taxing of games on the hardware.
I thought the sound effects were a bit annoying too, particularly the Warthog; just the wrong side of annoying.
It's a worthy game, if a bit formulaic. If it was "Halo 2" then this game might be one of the greatest games ever, but the gaming world has moved on a bit, and it doesn't really offer anything new. Yadda yadda... big ship threatening Earth, lone Master Chief going solo to stop it.. No major sense of drama; more a routine that you had to get through.
There were some definitely some pluses, new vehicles (loved the Mammoth). One qualm is the missions were too short, and the areas in which you could pilot the vehicles were too small.
Cortana does play a very big part in this one, strengthening the story somewhat.
I just finished the campaign, I really liked it, I could see myself trying for a legendary run (played heroic difficulty on my initial pass.)