Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They're entirely unrelated. HyperThreading is about virtual cores. Basically, when a (physical) core is under-utilized, the CPU can interleave data from another thread into the current one, milking a little more out of it. This gives the CPU 8 virtual cores (starting from 4 physical), when HT works correctly you can get about 20% more perfs out of your CPU, but it's pretty rare to have the perfect HT workload. Usually nothing to write home about..

Join the world of 3d rendering, my friend! Rendering engines punish those processors with hyper-threading!

I honestly can't think of any other app I use besides C4d which will use the HT.

Oh well, that's why I'm getting it anyway. :)
 
Overall, I like it - I'm getting the Ci7. However, I'll probably wait a couple of weeks before buying on the off chance we'll get some really terrible feedback from early buyers (massive overheating etc.).

That said, I'm only 90% satisfied. I don't care that much about BluRay. I'd much prefer a matte option, but I can live. The weakest link here is the HDD. No option for a SSD = bad. Also, if indeed there is no easy user access to the HDD = bad. Two nasties. I'd also prefer height adjustable. Finally, I'd have liked another FW access point, and 6 USB instead of 4.

It looks like the Ci7 is a good buy, because not much will happen for a year at least - it will be pretty future proof. The HDD though is a disaster - drives fail, and fail frequently; it should be a no brainer to have easy access. And the SSD option would be wonderful - really the single greatest performance booster at this point... of course, I understand that controllers are not standardized as yet, and capacities are tiny for stupid prices, but going forward that will change... only again, you won't be able to easily swap the HDD for a shiny new SDD when the time comes, because there's no easy access.

Still - 90% there. I'm very, very, pleased with this update. Frankly, I did not expect this until at least March of 2010, and even then I didn't think they'd do as nice a job with the top of the line iMac. I'm very, very impressed. Can't wait to buy it!!
 
They're entirely unrelated. HyperThreading is about virtual cores. Basically, when a (physical) core is under-utilized, the CPU can interleave data from another thread into the current one, milking a little more out of it. This gives the CPU 8 virtual cores (starting from 4 physical), when HT works correctly you can get about 20% more perfs out of your CPU, but it's pretty rare to have the perfect HT workload. Usually nothing to write home about.

Turbo Mode is a feature of the i* CPUs (i5, i7): when not all the cores are used and the CPU is cool enough, it can overclock itself dynamically. For the i5 750, this means that if you're using only 1 or 2 core your 2.66GHz quad-core can become a 3.2GHz dual-core. On i7 860 (2.8GHz), if you use 2 cores the CPU can go at 3.33GHz, and a single core can ramp up to 3.46GHz. It basically means your quad-core is much more flexible and works much better on single and dual-core loads.

They are

Handbrake is highly threaded so turbo mode won't activate beyond level 0(*) (it should always be able to load all 4 cores at the same time). I don't know how Handbrake behaves under HT so I can't comment on that one.

*: if the cooling is good enough, turbo mode actually overclocks the CPU even when all 4 cores are loaded: the i5 750 will run at 2.8GHz rather than 2.66, and the i7 860 will run at 2.93GHz instead of 2.8.


Thanks for this....very informative.

So let me ask:

1) Is the HT in these chips similar to the Mac Pros Xeons? Doesn't the 8 core Mac Pro show up as 16 virtual cores?

2) How would the i7 iMac compare to my 1st gen 2.66 Mac Pro Quad?

-Kevin
 
Express card slot

The SD card slot is nice, but an express card slot for more connectivity would have been great.
 
So is this something that should stop me from buying now? Are we talking "the graphics will be good, but they could have been great" or will I really notice things are not OK?

Are there realistic options for improving the graphics?

thanks

nic

Depends on what you are going to do with the computer. Do not buy the imac if you are going to game whatsoever. Most people usually just surf the internet, email and run office applications. This iMac is way overkill for that but it will be great at those tasks. i7 for video encoding will be great. When the first reviews come out for gaming and people see that a 512MB video card running a screen of that size at that resolution will immediately force you into low to medium settings people are going to be upset. If you don't care about that then I think this iMac is great for you.
 
I run my Core i7 desktop systems with HT disabled. Almost all of the time, that's better than enabled. Busy servers will have it enabled.
Pretty much yeah. Unless you're doing a lot of computation (image/audio/video stuff) you're probably better off without HT. Might be interesting to enable HT for a one-off ripping of a DVD if you have an i7, but overall the lack of HT in the i5 shouldn't be a big issue.
1) Is the HT in these chips similar to the Mac Pros Xeons? Doesn't the 8 core Mac Pro show up as 16 virtual cores?
It's the same tech yes, works the same way. HT isn't exactly young (Intel's first HT CPU was released in May 2003)
2) How would the i7 iMac compare to my 1st gen 2.66 Mac Pro Quad?
Quite favorably as far as the CPU is concerned I think, disk access might be a bigger issue (the i5 would have been limited in memory bandwidth, but the i7 is a monster on that front so…)
 
SATA is not a standard?

And the SSD option would be wonderful - really the single greatest performance booster at this point... of course, I understand that controllers are not standardized as yet,

That's the second time today that someone has claimed that, and I don't understand what they mean.

SSD drives are available in 2.5" PATA and SATA/SATAII controller interfaces, and right down to the screw holes for mounting they're plug-in compatible with 2.5" PATA and SATA spinning drives.

There are also 1.8" drives using the Micro-SATA connector standard, and some Mini-PCIe standard drives.

What do you mean by the "controllers are not standardized as yet"?
 
That's the second time today that someone has claimed that, and I don't understand what they mean.

SSD drives are available in 2.5" PATA and SATA/SATAII controller interfaces, and right down to the screw holes for mounting they're plug-in compatible with 2.5" PATA and SATA spinning drives.

There are also 1.8" drives using the Micro-SATA connector standard, and some Mini-PCIe standard drives.

What do you mean by the "controllers are not standardized as yet"?
I was looking at a PATA 2.5" SSD for an iBook last week. :eek:

Yes, I realize it was silly.

Quite favorably as far as the CPU is concerned I think, disk access might be a bigger issue (the i5 would have been limited in memory bandwidth, but the i7 is a monster on that front so…)
What memory bandwidth limits? I know it's dual channel but Anandtech looked at it in depth. It's not a problem.
 
The power adaptor is most intriguing to me of the "hidden secrets."

For what? The iMac? It’s built-in with just a regular power cord coming out the back. No idea the wattage yet though.

Anyone else notice that the macbook now has the MBA power adapter cable???

what is that about

I would say fraying “regular” MacBook adapters.
 

Attachments

  • design_hero3_20091020.jpg
    design_hero3_20091020.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 91
an 8GB ram upgrade for a 15" macbook pro is now $600. seems like this is lower than it used to be, no?
 
For what? The iMac? It’s built-in with just a regular power cord coming out the back. No idea the wattage yet though.
It has been on the iMac's spec page for hours. :confused:

Maximum continuous power: 241W (21.5-inch models); 365W (27-inch models)"]Maximum continuous power: 241W (21.5-inch models); 365W (27-inch models)
What it draws from the outlet is going to be greater.
 
It has been on the iMac's spec page for hours. :confused:

Your link doesn’t work.

But you’re right, it’s here:

http://www.apple.com/imac/specs.html

The target display option is very cool, but it seems a bit gimmicky for Apple.

I wouldn’t call it gimmicky. It’s been a big request of students for a while (gaming, one device in a dorm room, etc). It also prolongs the all-in-one lifecycle since now you won’t have to ditch the perfectly fine monitor when you get your next computer.

My question is how does it work? Is it an EFI function? Or do you have to boot into Mac OS X first?

"27-inch models also support input from external DisplayPort sources (adapters sold separately).”

Does it work with just DisplayPort sources? Or would a DisplayPort to female HDMI/DVI cable work?
 
I am almost salivating at these new iMacs, but I cannot and will not get one because it lacks a matte screen. There's tons of people like me who will not get glossy screens. There's a petition website http://macmatte.wordpress.com where I think people who want matte screens should group together to petition. Writing individually to Apple is good, but the problem is that those emails are hidden, and there's no public record of the groundswell of emotion against these glossy screens. I left a comment at the petition website, and I think everyone who wants matte screens should too.
 
Just ordered:

2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7
2TB Serial ATA Drive
Apple Magic Mouse
8GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 4x2GB
Apple Wireless Keyboard (English) and User's Guide
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
Country Kit
8x double-layer SuperDrive
+ Apple Remote + iPod Classic

Can't wait til November!!!!
 
Wait a minute...

Audio in AND out ?? In one socket??? How is this going to work if I'm going to use both at the same time?

I've got a hunch that there's gotta be a workaround but please don't tell me that I need to buy some sort of adapter....
 
Audio in AND out ?? In one socket??? How is this going to work if I'm going to use both at the same time?

I've got a hunch that there's gotta be a workaround but please don't tell me that I need to buy some sort of adapter....

You’ll need an adapter or a $20 USB audio adapter/card-on-a-stick. Star Tech makes a few that work just fine with OS X.
 
Audio in AND out ?? In one socket??? How is this going to work if I'm going to use both at the same time?

I've got a hunch that there's gotta be a workaround but please don't tell me that I need to buy some sort of adapter....

It appears to be two sockets...

Edit: if you're talking about the MacBook, nevermind. I don't know what to do with that either.
 
I think the iMac update was definitely the best of them all.

The new MacBook is positively underwhelming. The removal of firewire is OK for this kind of consumer laptop, but it wouldn't have killed them to put in an SD slot...regular people DO use cameras and that including one is not a "pro" feature, it's basically on every other laptop in the market. They should have included it.

The specs are basically unchanged. It's still too expensive. It should be $850.
It makes no sense not to shell out an extra $200 for the aluminum, extra ports, probably better screen, and keyboard backlighting in the cheapest MBP.

Someone at Apple is mixed up. MBs (like the iMacs) should include the SD slot, but the MBPs should have an ExpressCard slot for the pros--besides the fact that many pro photographers use CF cards.

As others have noted, the lack of FW is designed to push the consumer toward the MBP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.