Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Back to the future!
 

Attachments

  • powerbook-g5-mockup.jpg
    powerbook-g5-mockup.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 161
Seriously, i really dont understand why people like this dock... There are so many more elegant solutions, like the hub you attach to the USB-C port..
 
This thing is really bad, please don't use it.

It's going to ruin the screw mounts in the laptop and theyre not designed for that much added weight. These guys obviously haven't done much testing and it's a shame they would sell something that will break your laptop over time.

They're going to adopt Apple's design philosophy and use glue as well. Lots and lots of glue!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
Nice. Back to carrying around a late 1990s clunky laptop. And with 1990s ports.

No thanks. I'd rather plug in a tiny $4 adapter when needed.
When needed is the operative phrase, isn't it? Other than when working in my studio and connecting to my Caldigit TB2 dock from my old MBP (1 adapter, always attached, same effort as before) I have plugged a dongle into my 2016 MBP exactly twice in the more than a month I have owned it. I hadn't fully realized how much I used Dropbox, etc, to transfer files and if I am editing on the road I load media onto my Oyen RAID USB-C 3.1 Gen2 chassis with 2x 1TB SSDs installed that conveniently shipped with 2 cables, USB-C and USB-A. Not schilling, it's just a good product that I bought at $90USD.

Of course, different users will have different experiences but I suspect I am not the only owner with this experience.
 
Granted it's a prototype, but it looks rushed out to grab a few headlines at CES.

There's not much to the connection method for three years of development. Ergonomics straight out the window there.
 
The lack of MagSafe is up near the top of the list of reasons I won't upgrade to a 2016 MBP. I don't know a single one of many MBP owners I know who don't owe the life of their MBP to that connector many times over. Simply dumbfounding to me.
And the worst of all is that MagSafe is being removed for all MacBooks, not just the Pro. Mind you, the MagSafe was a reason that confirmed me the MacBook purchase was a good decision and that it was superior to competitors. Without the MagSafe, the MacBook is closest to PC laptops than ever. People are annoyed because of the removal of ports. I agree. But removing the MagSafe is far worse, because it cannot be fixed with dongles.
 
I don't see it. Too thick, the cable connection is really bad, and I truly think it has a limited lifespan. More and more things are going wireless or cloud... ports aren't going to be very important in the coming years.

It's depends what you do for a living. Not everyone has the same needs, the problem is Apple assumes everyone does have the same needs and now offers no choice in hardware configurations. A lot of people don't want a thin laptop, they want one with lots of ports, upgradeable RAM and storage, Ethernet and a matte screen option would be great. I need it to work, not to look cool.
[doublepost=1483704666][/doublepost]
Hey, maybe OWC will soon release a keyboard add-on. You just put in on top of your regular keyboard and it provides a real keyboard with actual travel. It could also add the missing physical esc-button and provide a protection for your palms so you don't accidentally trigger the gigantic new trackpad. Then you'll finally have the functionality of your old Macbook back!

Or it would finally convince even the most ignorant fanatics that maybe Apple majorly messed up and forgot about a lot of reasonable interests of a lot of people. I mean seriously, desperate measures like this one are an obvious symptom for this.

Or they could just transpose the motherboard into a whole new case....
[doublepost=1483705321][/doublepost]The sad thing is with all of this is none of it gets around the 16GB RAM limitation of the MBP. Yes it needs more ports, Ethernet, SD and a better keyboard, but 16GB RAM isn't enough.
 
Well, I think this thing represents Peak Cook.

The fact that the idea of screwing a third party dock to a £2K + laptop is being greeted with "Hmmm... you know, that might just make this machine feasible for me" instead of being laughed out of the room says all we need to know about Apple's recent direction.
 
The article is here; I read it. Unlike others here, I see no reason to criticize something intended to make a better MBP. Do you people bellyache every time your coffee is too hot?
 
LOL OH MY LAWD - this is garbage!

One plug into a raid or a hub and the problem is solved. Is doubling the thickness of a laptop really the solution? If you've got a problem with it then don't use a LAPTOP ... use a desktop. *cue all the bitter people who think the desktops are unusable* ... then use something else.
If Apple would make decent desktop computer, that would be an option.
Btw, there are people who need ports in other places than at your own work desk. You could buy one dock to go, one to work and one to home, but...
 
We replaced an older unit with a Dell largely because it provided the desired connectivity options. Interestingly, my wife, who is a heavy ipad user, seamlessly transitioned to the Dell because of its touchscreen. Has Apple also missed the boat by not providing ipad users with a comparable physical interface in the macbooks?
 
This will probably cost close to $1k and for what? Not much really. They should have taken the modular approach like Google and LG are trying to do with phones (but notably failing).
  • SSD Module
  • General Ports Modules
  • Optical Drive Module
  • Battery Module
  • GPU / Video module for gaming or 3d modeling / animation
  • Video production specific ports module
  • Audio production specific ports module with built in interface, XLR, etc...

All connected internally via USB-C. You could probably get a total of 4 modules into this thing, 2 on the left side and 2 on the right. Maybe some modules would need 2 slots but whatever...

You could then add a real GPU, SSD, more Battery power, blah, blah, blah....

Now that would be innovative and definitely would put the PRO back in MacBook PRO. I mean, you could turn this thing into a portable Flame... Oh, wait... nope, 16gb RAM limit... Too bad... Apple could have done this themselves and opened up that RAM limit... I was all set to buy a new MBP too, it was time for an upgrade but I'm holding off now until June to see if they do a spec bump.

Perfect solution too... Those that care about thinness can keep using their anorexic MBP and those that don't care and would rather have computing power and capabilities can opt for the "fatboy" add-on. Hell, they could even do a fatter version that vertically stacked modules so you could get 8 total.
 
Thats a lot of sacrifice just to use OS X....

expensive under powered laptop, no ports, unupgradable, have to buy extra dock to attach at bottom, have to deal with thicker laptop than competition.

Just buy a Windows laptop.
 
?? 4k? MacTracker says you have to have a retina 2013 to do 4k.

I did the same thing with my 2011 i7. 1TB SSD and 16GB RAM ( because according to Cook and Schiller no PRO needs more than 16GB ! ). Apple's new products are so compelling they are causing people to "upgrade" ( a function Apple no longer recognizes as legit ) their 5 year old hardware. Soon they won't have this problem as they will no longer make ANY computer that is upgradeable. That is.... IF they keep making computers at all.

Ship Be Sinkin' !!
I guess it's 3k-ish.
 
I hope Apple sees this as a red flag how crazy an unrealistic their products become. PLS Apple don't be that arrogant!
 
This thing could be a lot thinner if they didn't include the Ethernet jack. That one port determined the thickness of the entire, basically empty, shell.

Even without seeing a teardown... I'm pretty sure it's mostly hollow space inside. All the I/O is on the edges... and the 2.5" hard drive doesn't take up much room either.

But it's soooo thick because of that Ethernet port.

UlOVWIw.jpg


The other odd choice they made... why no battery? There's clearly room inside. But no... it's just a bunch of ports along the edges.

They basically took this:

satechi_new_expansion_gold_3.jpg


and spread it out across the entire laptop while adding substantial thickness everywhere. Sure there's a hard drive in the OWC DEC too... but it's still unnecessarily thick, in my opinion.

I'm not saying this thing needs to exist at all. But if they're gonna go down this road... they could have made it a little more streamlined.


I agree with you on all points. I would rather have a dongle for Ethernet for the rare times I need it. And a 2.5 drive is light weight and does not take up that much space, that would make sense. But something tells me they will be going with a PCI based SSD which will double the price.
 
Line Dock looks way better than this offering:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/line-dock-thinnest-and-smartest-laptop-power-bank-battery--2#/

And you don't have to screw it in to your computer...
As I predicted during all the initial outcry. Custom solutions for the small percentage of people who need it. Just need an extra 1000mAh? Use an existing universal battery pack. Need the works? Get one of these. Just need an SD card reader? Buy a dongle.

There are dozens of video, data, printer, audio ports from the last 40 years. Every one of them is still in use. Even ancient stuff like VGA is very common in conference rooms. [Gee I sure wish I could hook the RCA stereo of my turntable up without an adaptor...] Everyone does not need or want a dozen+ ports of varying obsolescence on their laptop.

Queue all the thickness whining from the people who whined about thinness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Please, OWC, implement some sort of MagSafe, and make it available to all MacBooks. Apple doesn't care about Mac users satisfaction anymore, and the removal of MagSafe is insulting to say the least. Please, OWC, help fix the Apple wrong decisions.
its okay, its so chunky the cable is likely gonna rip before pulling your laptop with that atrocity attached.
 
With a base as thick as that, it better offer 24 hours battery life or not worth it.
 
This thing would have never needed to be invented if the most useful features of the PRO laptop were not removed in the first place.

Now instead of ultra thiness, Ives asethic gets a third party make over making it even thicker than the previous gen.

Nice move.
Exactly what I and millions of others have been forced to do by buying a Mophie case - all that time spent making it look beautifully thin wasted because the thing doesn't actually work for a whole day of heavy use...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.