Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We all know this is the stepping-stone to a portless iPhone. This allows the phone to be charged WHILE using it, unlike Qi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
This charger works and sticks to other iPhones and also some Android phones.
The guys over at Android Central tested the charger with a few different phones and it works surprisingly well with non-Apple devices.
It even helps center itself on the charging coils without the phone having any magnets.

 
Does anyone know if Magsafe charging affects battery health in any way? Is it worse for the battery in the long term to charge it using one method over the other?
 
Interesting, so there's not a ton of clearance of the white pad and aluminum case.
I'm sure apple has that of this, but I'd still be wary of it slowly scratching the glass from being put down on the charger repeatedly.
Will be interesting to see how strong the magnets are ie. will it be easy to lift it off the back without angling the edge into the phone too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: S G
I’m a little confused at the thought of this being designed for a nightstand. The cable is meant to go down the bottom of the phone. So you either have the cable going over the front of your nightstand (and drawer if you have one); or, you need to place the bottom of your phone facing the wall to allow the cable to go behind the nightstand.

I could be wrong...but I don't think that the orientation of the plug matters when connecting this to the iPhone 12. In other words, you can have the wire hanging down the back of your nightstand and still place your iPhone on the charger with the bottom facing away from the wall. If anyone knows for sure...please let me know...because I just ordered six of these things for all the nightstands in my house and it would be a damn shame if this charger needed to have the cord facing the bottom of the iPhone in order for the magnets to stick and/or charge the phone.

Thanks!
 
Does anyone know if Magsafe charging affects battery health in any way? Is it worse for the battery in the long term to charge it using one method over the other?

 
No wall connector in a $39 wireless charger.

Also - its important to point out the hypocrisy of apple ditching wall chargers ”for the environment” and then pushing the inefficient wireless charging which results in power loss and therefore more power needed to charge the device. Wireless charging is “bad for the environment” by Apples logic.
Even though you're wrong, your point at least has some merit in the sense that this kind of "waste" is actually measurable, vs. the hilarious "e-waste" which is entirely theoretical and not provably wasteful or harmful in anyway. This is one of the many environmental catchall arguments where something is just assumed wasteful because it exists, and asking for proof or clarification of how its wasteful gets you called names by enviro-fanatics.
[automerge]1603141044[/automerge]
Does it flip all over the place like the Apple Watch charger?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: JimmyBanks6
"Only"

Wow. That's impressive.

Well, the issue is that some people have Lightning and USB-C now. And I prolly do have 30 USB power adapters, 10 free ones in a drawer.

And a couple Lightning to USB-C but mostly Lightning to USB.

So I have 2 types (USB & USB-C) of Universal power adapters, 2 types of Lightning, plus a proprietary watch charger.
 
Does anyone know if Magsafe charging affects battery health in any way? Is it worse for the battery in the long term to charge it using one method over the other?

I would think Apple engineers would’ve of thought of something so obvious if it would affect the battery in a detrimental way. However, the one symptom that wireless charging poses, is the battery tends to heat quicker, Which if that has any long-term effects, it’s probably variable for A.) How long of a duration the phone is on the charger and B.) How often it’s used on the charger. [As in, only used once a day or charged multiple times throughout the day.]
 
  • Like
Reactions: twanj and M-Life
I'm seeing a $40 charger, not included with a $1000+ phone, that seems to have the same failure-prone cable attachment point as Apple's other fragile charging cables. Apple's Lightning cables aren't very durable but at least they're relatively inexpensive. This costs about twice as much.

Whatever happened to that rumor about Apple including a higher quality, braided cable with the new iPhones?

Also, regarding that video showing the Otterbox case, that's just awful. If I receive Apple's $50 magnetic case tand the magnet is that weak, I'm returning it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: twanj
I’m a little confused at the thought of this being designed for a nightstand. The cable is meant to go down the bottom of the phone. So you either have the cable going over the front of your nightstand (and drawer if you have one); or, you need to place the bottom of your phone facing the wall to allow the cable to go behind the nightstand.
It’s round. It spins.
 
It seems pretty weird to evaluate this product with other Qi devices, and use words like "disappointing". It isn't meant to be used with anything other than iPhone 12.

Yeah, but it seems to me that if it's Qi-compatible, out in the real world you may well want it to be able to work with pre-iPhone 12 phones as well. If I get an iPhone 12, which I might well do, my wife's iPhone SE will still want to be charged -- and aligning and balancing it on this little charger might not be so fun.
 
I’m a little confused at the thought of this being designed for a nightstand. The cable is meant to go down the bottom of the phone. So you either have the cable going over the front of your nightstand (and drawer if you have one); or, you need to place the bottom of your phone facing the wall to allow the cable to go behind the nightstand.

Unless I'm missing something, I assume it's orientation-neutral and you can put your phone on it "upside down" and route the cord to the back of your nightstand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twanj
It seems pretty weird to evaluate this product with other Qi devices, and use words like "disappointing". It isn't meant to be used with anything other than iPhone 12.

nope.
From Apple’s sales page.
The MagSafe Charger maintains compatibility with Qi charging, so it can be used to wirelessly charge your iPhone 8 or later, as well as AirPods models with a wireless charging case, as you would with any Qi-certified charger.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.