How does it compare with products with similar specs?**** off with your pricing, Apple.
How does it compare with products with similar specs?**** off with your pricing, Apple.
In a community that has a voracious appetite for batteries - players of Ingress and Pokemon Go - pretty much everyone carries an external battery, because, as you say, they all require the additional battery life. But very few are using battery cases, it's almost always an external battery and a cable. Something the size of the 2x 18650 battery packs (roughly the size, but not the weight, of a couple rolls of dimes side-by-side, e.g. Anker's PowerCore II 6700 and similar ones from other manufacturers) carries a ton of extra usage time, in not hugely more volume than Apple's battery case, and costs closer to $20. And has the advantage of not needing to be connected when you're not actively using it. And if you need substantially more power, there are larger sizes available (where likely no one would carry multiple of Apple's battery case to swap out when needed).I get this product isn’t for everybody, but if you’re somebody that doesn’t always have access to a charging port throughout your day/commute, ... The price point is relative pending how much someone requires the additional battery life.
I ordered one for my Max. It will be here tomorrow (they upgraded my shipping). I didn't buy it for its looks. I bought it for its intended purpose. For all those complaining about the looks, it is a battery pack case. It isn't meant to have a runway model carry it down the runway, as if it were a new fashion accessory.
I'm guessing that water has an infinitely high IP rating, as water will not damage water.Anyone know the IP rating for water?
It would be very easy for Apple to flatten this battery and have it go all the way to the top making the case slim but noooo that’s too much work for a company that flaunts aesthetics.
It would be very easy for Apple to flatten this battery and have it go all the way to the top making the case slim but noooo that’s too much work for a company that flaunts aesthetics.
Why would it? How have other manufactures done it with no problems that antenna lines that wrap around the sides would still work just fine.Its actually to do with the antenna placement and ensuring good signal, if you were to place a battery near the top it would impact the antenna performance
Who takes their case off more than once a month if that. I haven’t used a case in years so I don’t know. Their normal cases are super flexible.The point is to keep the top flexible so you can easily put the case on or take it off.
When Apple doesn’t do something “easy”, it often helps to ask “why” instead of “why not”.
Must admit picked mine up yesterday and came with 0% charged so guessing that is more a handling thing
If you like using and carrying your iPhone tethered [to the power bank], for sure.Unless they make a battery version of the Wallet case, battery cases are uninteresting. Just buy a cheaper and larger power bank with USB-C fast charging support instead.
Do they [work with no problems]? Has anybody actually compared 'antenna performance' with these cases?Why would it? How have other manufactures done it with no problems that antenna lines that wrap around the sides would still work just fine.
Well, USB Power Delivery (PD), which is used for fast charging, does use higher voltage already. Moreover, doubling the voltage could only happen if a plugged in power supply would charge the phone in parallel with the battery case which would assume a scenario where you connect the combo for charging while the case still has any charge left. Since in normal use, the case gets discharged first, this would only happen if you re-charge the phone after a usage that wasn't long enough to deplete the case battery (which could certainly happen but would be less common).Would using this battery case over a long time period reduce the life (health) of the internal battery?
According to others it is using two batteries in series which doubles the voltage and since USB chargers are not of this higher voltage, it is the reason why I'm asking.
And this battery case needs to be connected when you are not actively using it?In a community that has a voracious appetite for batteries - players of Ingress and Pokemon Go - pretty much everyone carries an external battery, because, as you say, they all require the additional battery life. But very few are using battery cases, it's almost always an external battery and a cable. Something the size of the 2x 18650 battery packs (roughly the size, but not the weight, of a couple rolls of dimes side-by-side, e.g. Anker's PowerCore II 6700 and similar ones from other manufacturers) carries a ton of extra usage time, in not hugely more volume than Apple's battery case, and costs closer to $20. And has the advantage of not needing to be connected when you're not actively using it.
Sure, but during these 20%, you are tethered via a cable to something. That's more annoying than a bulkier device. And it wouldn't be 100% of the time anyway if you don't want it. It would be more like 35% of the time (ie, the time during which the case is powering the device, once the case battery is discharged, you can remove the case again if you want to).I don't doubt that Apple's battery cases are well executed, and offer features that other batteries can't match (since iOS is aware of them), but the combination of costing on the order of 5 times as much, *and* making the phone more awkward 100% of the time, rather than the 20% of the time I need the boost, makes it less attractive.
With a battery case, I imagine a typical use case might be to use it with your iPhone at the start of the day (where it keeps your phone constantly topped off at 100%). Then when the case runs out of juice, you can then remove the case and continue using just the phone. Then place the case back on when charging for the night.Who takes their case off more than once a month if that. I haven’t used a case in years so I don’t know. Their normal cases are super flexible.
Yeah, I get it. You think anybody using any kind of charging case on any kind of phone is an idiot. I'd guess feeling smart has a higher priority for you than not insulting the significant group of people that buy charging cases.You people are using your phone too much. There is charging available everywhere these days. In car, in office, home, bus, plane, airport you name it.
I always thought these cases were ugly, but having looked at them again I am beginning to see why apple did what they did. I'm ok with that. For me this is a useless accessory. For my wife or in-laws it might be worth it. I find my 8plus always has plenty of charge. (yes I know I can't get one for my phone.)These cases are not aesthetically pleasing. They look the way they do because they take into account antenna placement, interference, and other engineering issues that the makers of cheap Chinese knockoffs don't care about.
[doublepost=1547771770][/doublepost]
Amazing that in 2019 people are still whining about a headphone jack, a useless appendage that should have died 10 years ago.
[doublepost=1547771811][/doublepost]
That's really all that matters.
Of course MOAR!!!! Is always better.
However so far the battery life with my XS Max and how quickly it charges I personally don’t really have a need for this.
I currently have the Apple silicone case on the phone. but the reason why I have it is I like how slim it is. If I was going to add the extra bulk of a battery case I don’t know if I would pick this one or go with a Mophie or other hard battery case.
Edit: The other reason I like the Mophie is because of the micro USB connector. I do not have a problem with the lightning connector I just like the ability of having both ports in a pinch if I have to charge the device without having to worry about where I left my adapter.