Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Say what you will, but screens that can enlarge on the fly is the future of mobile devices. Folding may not be the solution, but the concept of being to enlarge your phone screen to create a tablet on demand will be the future. Instead of carrying large screened phones (which are still smaller than your average tablet) and a tablet, you'll just simply transform your phone screen into tablet size. Folding has many drawbacks in the long term, but there are other solutions to enlarge the screen.
 
I don't really have too much to add that hasn't already been said regarding the Galaxy Fold - it is what it is - if you love it, get it. If not, see what Apple has in store.

Having said that, the recent focus on the Galaxy Fold has got me thinking about the evolution of the smart phone - where it's been, where it is now and where it's going. Don't laugh, but I got my first cell phone (in my latter 20's at that) in 2005. I can't remember the model but it was one of those very basic Nokia models with a small color LCD, decent ringtone capability (remember those?) and some VERY limited web surfing capabilities which I don't think I ever figured out as you had to actually manually input some network settings to get the thing to connect.

Flash forward a bit and my next phone was a nice Nokia flip phone. It was a step up from the earlier Nokia I mentioned, could play MP3 ringtones, featured a Micro SD slot, and had the ability to play something better than the initial Nokia's primitive 'Snake' game (actually, the newer Nokia also had a Snake game but it was called 'Snake 3D' which was pretty cool I must admit - spent many an hour at the bar playing that - but I digress). The most noteworthy feature on this phone was that it was dual-screen. Not in the true sense - the main screen was the one active when the phone was flipped open, and the secondary was the one that was on the active when it was closed. It was also a color LCD (nice touch) but had a slightly lower resolution, etc. It was handy for checking the time or seeing who was calling at any moment without flipping the phone open. It even had some snazzy animated wallpapers that could be different from the main screens. I had that phone for 2 years before - you guessed it - we made the leap to the iPhone 3G which was not even on the same planet in terms of advancement.

Where am I going with all this? I think at one point I thought the future of smartphones was going to be dual or more screens. IMHO the iPhone killed all of that momentum (and maybe for good reason). Apple 'said' the future is a single large screen, and that was that. Perhaps with this proof-of-concept Galaxy fold, the two screen paradigm has another day to live. Maybe at some point 'flip phones' will make a retro-comeback, albeit with vastly improved horsepower and features. Maybe I'm getting old, and possibly some of you are too young to remember this, but I miss the tactile feedback of the main screen flipping open violently after pressing the little open button, and conversely the satisfying 'snap' after closing it. After performing that action thousands of times it was burned into my subconscious memory and as wildly great as the iPhone 3G was in comparison, it did take me quite awhile to accept the boring click of the home button as its replacement.

In summation, the Galaxy Fold is as close to a modern version of the old 00's flip phone as I can think of. I think Apple is using Samsung as their 'useful idiot' and letting them go through the painful learning curve of this new tech, and once its been proved out, will cherry pick the best iterations and then do their Apple magic and come out with their own version - and say it's the first of its kind. ;)
 
Last edited:
If it was $299 ppl be flocking to it in droves.
I'm waiting for the foldable glasses. ;)
 
Is iPad a folding smartphone or something? What's your point? Galaxy Fold is the best folding smartphone on the market (simply by virtue of being the only one). Yes, it has obvious issues. We'll see if the tradeoffs are worth it for [some] people.
What are you talking about? It’s not the only one...and it’s still terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech986
Is iPad a folding smartphone or something? What's your point? Galaxy Fold is the best folding smartphone on the market (simply by virtue of being the only one). Yes, it has obvious issues. We'll see if the tradeoffs are worth it for [some] people.

Just wondering where the hypocrites are. The budget iPad screen is still superior to the Galaxy Fold. If it’s unacceptable in a $329 device then it should be a downright embarrassment in a $2,000 device.

Likewise people saying the notch in the iPhone is ridiculous and a “dealbreaker” preventing them from buying one. Yet the Galaxy Fold also has a notch, and it’s even bigger than the iPhone and looks worse due to it being off-center.

This device has far too many trade offs and doesn’t bring anything useful. Developers have already adapted to phone screens and use features like slide-in panes off to the side for quick and easy access to additional content. And I don’t even need to waste time unfolding a device to access that content.
 
Despite all of the shortcomings, I think it's an amazing device. For now I consider it a publicly available prototype (sort of public beta), which has a number of issues and a very high price, but I do hope that this technology will advance quickly. The idea of carrying a phone-sized tablet device, with the potential performance of the future iPhone/iPad devices is truly incredible. This is a sneak-peak into the future.
 
This reminds me of when Samsung was trying to make a smart watch and in the first year or two they made like a half dozen versions just trying to figure it out. Then the Apple Watch came out and people were stoked to see Apple basically do it right.
That said, if they offered a round variant of the Apple Watch I’d probably buy it. Now that Jony Ive is gone they should go ahead and do that. Probably one of the main reasons anyone considers a different smart watch (aside from ppl being cheap) is the form factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech986
This reminds me of when Samsung was trying to make a smart watch and in the first year or two they made like a half dozen versions just trying to figure it out. Then the Apple Watch came out and people were stoked to see Apple basically do it right.

People make fun of the $2k price tag, but the iPhone 11 max gets pretty close to that point with 512 gig. A folding iPhone would probably cost $4k with 64 gig.
Interesting. But more of a science project than a viable product.

Indeed. But at least they're trying something innovative other than 5% faster and another camera module.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and Arran
Indeed. But at least they're trying something innovative other than 5% faster and another camera module.
Yes, innovation is good, but are folding screens ready for real world abuse? The tech seems immature and a bit fragile right now.

I could be wrong of course. I thought Apple was nuts releasing a glass front/backed iPhone 4. And yet here I am with an iPhone 11. And that's after owning a 4, 4s and X - all sans drama. So who knows? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DevNull0
Say what you will, but screens that can enlarge on the fly is the future of mobile devices. Folding may not be the solution, but the concept of being to enlarge your phone screen to create a tablet on demand will be the future. Instead of carrying large screened phones (which are still smaller than your average tablet) and a tablet, you'll just simply transform your phone screen into tablet size. Folding has many drawbacks in the long term, but there are other solutions to enlarge the screen.
Wright brothers said that man will never fly, that was year before their first flight.

you should be careful about such predictions or Simone will quote you then.
 
Kinda funny to think about the price and how badly this thing is designed. Remember when the iPhone X first came out and all the hysteria over "apple expects us to pay $1k for a phone? Ridiculous I say!" Now it's "well ok I'll pay TWICE that if it has a tiny screen in front, fragile screen when you open it and serious build quality issues. GIMME"

for 2k you could buy an iPhone 11pro AND an iPad Pro. Think about that for a second. And those are the absolute best of both worlds. No compromises.
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you have to do it.
Jeff gold bloom moment right here

1569642324100.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Wow. Compromised in every possible way for some useless gimmick (IMO).
  • Awkward (non-standard) screen size in every configuration.
  • Hardware failure points galore
  • Not a good phone form factor
  • Not a good tablet/phablet form factor
  • And that off-center notch tho, ugh
This is NOT pushing the envelope or innovating or evolving, it's just a bad idea poorly implemented. Move along. A "throw crap at the wall" move in true Samsung style.

Agree. I'd be shocked if Apple hasn't produced a dozen or two folding phone prototypes in their labs over the years and came to the conclusion there isn't a compelling reason to move forward.

And... if a folding phone is thicker when folded than my iPhone X, that would be a no-go for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gnasher729
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.