Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Hands-On With the New 4K 23.7-Inch LG UltraFine Display

It's a monitor. A black rectangle with an aluminum base. Anything more complicated than that would be bad.

I'm super tempted to get this. Literally the only thing keeping me from pulling the trigger is the hope that Apple's next display will have Face ID.

bitkahuna said:
Makes absolutely no sense that you wouldn't want to use native resolution.
Click to expand...
macOS always uses the native resolution. He's talking about scaling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Cosmosent said:
RE: "Unfortunately, Apple's 6K display is rumored to be super pricey,"

Personally, I find that very hard to believe !
Click to expand...
Unless it is twice the cost of similar featured 4K monitors it’s a good buy... to me at least. ‘Been waiting since 2016 to replace my 2013 Mac Pro and 2 thunderbolt displays with ‘new Mac pro’ And a single ultrawide display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarantularock
Um, no thanks. Maybe if I wanted it for a desktop setup for a MBP, but that's the only reason I might want one. And even then, I'd rather have a larger size.
 
Good quality displays but why are these still so expensive for their size? I picked up an LG C8 for $1500. MSRP for that was above 3 grand and these monitors aren’t on sale often, if at all but still. How can these IPS LED LCD panels still be so expensive? They don’t even go past 500 nits.
 
ThisBougieLife said:
So does the larger size and lower resolution mean that it isn't technically "retina"? Because this display has a PPI that is not the same as the usual retina displays. All the retina displays have a PPI (at native resolution) of around 220, but this one has a PPI of 185.
Click to expand...
Maybe someone will do the math, but to the extent the 24” is positioned [some unknown distance] farther away from you than the 21.5” would be, the 24” will be just as “Retina” as the smaller monitor.

Similarly the iPad’s 264 ppi looks the same as the iPhone's 326 ppi (and both are Retina) if the iPad is held a certain distance farther away from your eyes than you’d hold an iPhone.

Update: there are online calculators for viewing distance vs. ppi; for this 24.7” monitor, you’d have to be 18.5” away to be Retina, as opposed to only 15.75” for the 220 ppi 21.5” 4K and 27” 5K monitors.

So basically if you had a 21.5” monitor at a 16” viewing distance, you could replace it with this monitor and it would have the same apparent pixel density as long as you positioned it 3” farther away.
 
Last edited:
ThisBougieLife said:
So does the larger size and lower resolution mean that it isn't technically "retina"? Because this display has a PPI that is not the same as the usual retina displays. All the retina displays have a PPI (at native resolution) of around 220, but this one has a PPI of 185.
Click to expand...
There's no such thing as "retina" it's a dumb buzzword made up by Apple
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and netdudeuk
so Apple just happens to sell a display that doesn't follow Retina resolution, which is currently ~220p on Mac and the previous Ultrafine 4k/5k
 
I don't think it's fair to say "Apple quietly released..." this monitor.

I've noticed MacRumors saying this lately for non-Apple products (eg. BlackMagic Design eGPU). Apple is not the one releasing these products. These are 3rd party product developers and companies that are releasing their product FOR Mac. Maybe there is a partnership, but these aren't Apple products.

Maybe "Apple quietly replaced the LG-branded 4K UltraFine Display to its online store" doesn't quite have the same effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and Black Tiger
JetTester said:
Um, no thanks. Maybe if I wanted it for a desktop setup for a MBP, but that's the only reason I might want one. And even then, I'd rather have a larger size.
Click to expand...

6048x2880 32-34 inches diagonal. 1.5 meter radius curve. Well, and oled but that’s unlikely. And I really want a touchscreen. Mac OS supports several common ones like the acer 27 inch touchscreen but only one touch. Still awesome for testing iOS apps in the simulator. Freaks guests out in my office.
 
Oh Apple, please release monitors soon - my Thunderbolt Display's TB2 cable broke, I'm using the spare TB2 port and cable to keep it running - and I don't want to replace it with an non Apple display!
 
Why not just release iMac like Apple-branded aluminium monitors? What is the problem?

This monitor doesn't make any sense for me, because of the macOS scaling. Did they completely forget about that or what!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: loby
jonnysods said:
Oh Apple, please release monitors soon - my Thunderbolt Display's TB2 cable broke, I'm using the spare TB2 port and cable to keep it running - and I don't want to replace it with an non Apple display!
Click to expand...

There are plenty of classic Apple Cinema Displays floating around out there. You can easily get one on eBay. I'm not a fan anymore though, but I am sure glad other people still are because I was able to sell a 30" ACD last year for an amazing price considering how old the monitor was. Those aluminum beasts took up so much room and generated a massive amount of heat. I sweat so much less in my office now that I longer have a 30" hot plate in front of my face all day.
[doublepost=1558585042][/doublepost]
T.j.p. said:
Unless it is twice the cost of similar featured 4K monitors it’s a good buy... to me at least. ‘Been waiting since 2016 to replace my 2013 Mac Pro and 2 thunderbolt displays with ‘new Mac pro’ And a single ultrawide display.
Click to expand...

I read somewhere on here that it's rumored that the rumored 6K display would likely have a built in eGPU, which would add to the cost, but also be a welcome addition because the LG 5K displays are already pretty hard to drive efficiently.

I'm willing to spend quite a bit on a really good display. Better monitor = better productivity for me. I'm willing to pay a premium, but I hestitate after all the struggles I've had with getting all of my programs to push buckets of pixels to my 5K. Capture One Pro actually causes my Vega 20 MBP to overheat and shut down when the 5K monitor is being used. Without the external monitor, the fans only spin up lightly.
 
Last edited:
I have the LG 5K version and at first I really didn't like the design compared to my Thunderbolt monitors. But it grew on me over time especially since the bezels are smaller and less noticeable than the Thunderbolt's and I just love love the screen quality!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Royksöpp and smirking
No thank you very much. I would rather buy a better Dell for much less. And it would be much bigger too.
 
T.j.p. said:
Unless it is twice the cost of similar featured 4K monitors it’s a good buy... to me at least. ‘Been waiting since 2016 to replace my 2013 Mac Pro and 2 thunderbolt displays with ‘new Mac pro’ And a single ultrawide display.
Click to expand...
No way a new Apple 6k miniLED display to be under 1599$
 
bitkahuna said:
Makes absolutely no sense that you wouldn't want to use native resolution.
Click to expand...
Why? You are aware that 2:1 resolution scaling that „looks like 1080p/1440p“ is the standard the 4K/5K iMacs are delivered with, so why wouldn’t the same thing make sense here? If this display is set to 1920x1080 then every UI element you see on-screen is four times as sharp than if you are using it at a full „looks like 4K“ resolution, where everything on screen will be very tiny. You are still getting an equally sharp image, the interface is just larger which for many people makes more sense.
 
msteele said:
I have the LG 5K version and at first I really didn't like the design compared to my Thunderbolt monitors. But it grew on me over time especially since the bezels are smaller and less noticeable than the Thunderbolt's and I just love love the screen quality!
Click to expand...

I have the 4K version. It is really a nice monitor. However, I have two complaints:

- I am having trouble finding an egpu other than the expensive blackmagicdesign egpu because it only accepts usb-c video input. No other videocards support that.

I have an HP laptop as well with both usb- and hdmi video output. Connecting throug usb-c using windows 10 does not work (windows does not recognize the monitor as usb device), I can’t use the hdmi output as I can’t find an hdmi to usb-c video cable.

In short, it only works with mac video output usb-c capable computers. That means I can hardly sell it too.
 
basj said:
I have the 4K version.

In short, it only works with mac video output usb-c capable computers. That means I can hardly sell it too.
Click to expand...

The original UltraFine 4K works on any USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alternate Mode. This includes PCs with Thunderbolt 3 ports, and USB-C expansion cards that support DisplayPort. For HP, you can see that some models do not support DP over USB-C while some do.

I believe all of the new Nvidia cards with the VirtualLink connector will work, haven't seen evidence though.

Somebody wrote some Windows software to control the brightness.
 
Last edited:
I completely disagree with everyone that says it’s an ugly design. It looks much better in person. It’s simple and unobtrusive. It’s very industrial and straight forward. I find it better looking then all of the LG displays with that hideous curved silver stand and that shiny white plastic back. Now those are ugly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: umbilical, basj, kjell and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back