Here’s another way to write this, so it’s a bit more clear to some:
I have an i5-12400 running MacOS. It’s a basic last-generation entry to mid-level desktop CPU, and I want to know how much faster for everyday apps the M2 Pro (the high end, fully expanded one) would be. Well, let’s use GeekBench as a reference; it’s as good as any. Single-core changes from 1636 to 1952 (MacOSRumors posting). That’s a 1952/1636 change, or a jump of 19%. So for most everyday things, the new M2 Pro will feel about 20% faster. I’m not sure I’d notice this, but for some things I might.
For video rendering / encoding, which typically does take all cores, and assuming both use a similar process without any underlying QuickSync/ProResEncoder efficiency gains, we can compare multi core Geekbench scores. The i5-12400 is 8062, and the M2 Pro (highest end) is 15013 (again, MacOS Rumors; preliminary results), for a gain of 15013/8062 86%. Thus, I’d expect (if I’m using similar processes and technologies, and both OS’s libraries are similarly efficient, which is never the case) for the M2 Pro to be about 86% faster in things that could use all cores concurrently, which is mostly video encode tasks, video related tasks, and similar non-UI work.
Yes, this is a massive stretch; there are a thousand exceptions; the M2 ProRes encoder helps with encoding, the M2 (and i5) have hardware on them to help with many different things, but as a basic number comparison, this is a very basic baseline. It might be wise to average this with Cinebench and Passmark too, but I digress.
But it’s also accurate to say that for most things used everyday, it’s perhaps 20% faster, and many wouldn’t notice such a difference.
** Apologies to all; much, much later edit (yes, bad form) —> It should be noted that even the cheapest Mac mini setup at $499 is exactly the same speed in everyday tasks. THE SAME SPEED. The CPU cores have exactly the same performance characteristics. GPU is faster in the M2 Pro, sure, but the CPU cores speed (assuming you’re happy with 4 and under - remember, everyday tasks…) is exactly the same. That’s something I feel many folks don’t fully understand.
I have an i5-12400 running MacOS. It’s a basic last-generation entry to mid-level desktop CPU, and I want to know how much faster for everyday apps the M2 Pro (the high end, fully expanded one) would be. Well, let’s use GeekBench as a reference; it’s as good as any. Single-core changes from 1636 to 1952 (MacOSRumors posting). That’s a 1952/1636 change, or a jump of 19%. So for most everyday things, the new M2 Pro will feel about 20% faster. I’m not sure I’d notice this, but for some things I might.
For video rendering / encoding, which typically does take all cores, and assuming both use a similar process without any underlying QuickSync/ProResEncoder efficiency gains, we can compare multi core Geekbench scores. The i5-12400 is 8062, and the M2 Pro (highest end) is 15013 (again, MacOS Rumors; preliminary results), for a gain of 15013/8062 86%. Thus, I’d expect (if I’m using similar processes and technologies, and both OS’s libraries are similarly efficient, which is never the case) for the M2 Pro to be about 86% faster in things that could use all cores concurrently, which is mostly video encode tasks, video related tasks, and similar non-UI work.
Yes, this is a massive stretch; there are a thousand exceptions; the M2 ProRes encoder helps with encoding, the M2 (and i5) have hardware on them to help with many different things, but as a basic number comparison, this is a very basic baseline. It might be wise to average this with Cinebench and Passmark too, but I digress.
But it’s also accurate to say that for most things used everyday, it’s perhaps 20% faster, and many wouldn’t notice such a difference.
** Apologies to all; much, much later edit (yes, bad form) —> It should be noted that even the cheapest Mac mini setup at $499 is exactly the same speed in everyday tasks. THE SAME SPEED. The CPU cores have exactly the same performance characteristics. GPU is faster in the M2 Pro, sure, but the CPU cores speed (assuming you’re happy with 4 and under - remember, everyday tasks…) is exactly the same. That’s something I feel many folks don’t fully understand.
Last edited:
