A new mac design every 2 years from 1998 to 2009, then it dries up just like the screenless macs
We can thank the iPhone for that...
A new mac design every 2 years from 1998 to 2009, then it dries up just like the screenless macs
Other than the Apple IIe, the products you listed are all of equal importance sequentially. iMac would never have existed without the original Macintosh, iPod would never have existed without the iMac, and iPhone would never have existed without the iPod.Not even close:
1. iPod
2. iPhone
3. Apple IIe
4. MacIntosh (original)
5. iMac
That’s a great set-up, complete with a fine LEGO model sitting in the middle. Have just “helped” a family member build the latest Millennium Falcon (all 7500 odd pieces of it), marveling at what LEGO has done recently with the Star Wars range, particularly the larger sets...
To say that I loved both the eMac and OSX Panther would be an understatement. The eMac went to my parents when I upgraded to the iMac G5 and Panther still holds a special place in my heart for the fact it was SO much better than XP SP1, and for the promo with ‘Omar at the Grove Apple Store’ and a pre-mega stardom level of fame JJ Abrams.
The eMac G4 may not have been the design revolution of either the iMac G3 or G4 but so help me, I absolutely adored mine.
Jobs quip aside, that's exactly what the reaction was like from the neckbeard crowd.No SCSI! No ADB! No expansion slots! No floppy!
USB isn't mature enough to really solely on it!
Steve Jobs wouldn’t have ever allowed this!
Oh wait...
A new mac design every 2 years from 1998 to 2009, then it dries up just like the screenless macs
I was a fan of AIO computers during the 8 and 16 bit era, when they weren't outdated as fast as today and time passed slowly due to the young age. Later I was surprised by the level of success Apple had (and still have) with this concept of poor upgradeability/maintenance that renders the whole thing useless as soon as one component breaks.
Yes, you are correct, megabytes, not gigabytes.The article states that the first iMac came equipped with 120GB of storage. I am not sure how old the author is, but I suspect that “GB” should have been a “MB.”
Thank you for sharing the promo, its a shame the Apple does not really promote OS X in the way that it used too, I guess partly because Windows has caught up to a large extent these days.
Wow, twenty years ago. How time flies!
We've had two iMacs, a 2004 G5 one and an early 2009 Core2Duo 24". The G5 was a tank and was silly easy to work on. The design of that thing was GREAT. The 24" was a total lemon. Failed HDD, Kernel panics due to memory, slow, bleh. My wife thinks it's cursed.
I kinda wish they would go back to a design that was less of a glued together mess, and more of a 'I can service my computer!' setup. One of the things that got me to switch to the mac in the first place was I could use standard memory/hdd's in them without any fuss. Now, they solder things in, use proprietary SSDs, and basically make it really difficult to do anything to it. It's probably going to get worse before it gets better too.
Nevertheless, you can't argue with the importance of the machine to Apple's legacy. Without the iMac, they wouldn't be here.