We need an overhaul and I hope the logic you've stated is correct. You're right though, it does feel like a 6ss.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hard to justify the upgrade
- Thread starter ericgtr12
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
We need an overhaul and I hope the logic you've stated is correct. You're right though, it does feel like a 6ss.
Screen, front back camera, CPU, chipset, home button. This is not an "ss " update.
This update to be perfectly honest doesnt even deserve to be called an S update.A better camera and no antenna,home button is the best they could come up with?Disappointing.Especially when Android companies are betting on VR,Wireless charging,OLED displays,Dertachable modules in the LG G5 etc
The display is still bad as usual.750P display in 2016?You are kidding me Apple.Your closest competitor is on 2K resolution.You should feel ashamed but considering Tim's involved,prolly not
The display is still bad as usual.750P display in 2016?You are kidding me Apple.Your closest competitor is on 2K resolution.You should feel ashamed but considering Tim's involved,prolly not
I guess every version is an update of the previous so the question is - when does a brand new one kick in? One that can be considered an overhaul?
This made me think about the iPhone 7 for a second. You know all those times you pull the phone out of your pocket accidentally hitting Siri in the process, surely I'm not the only one, having the pressure sensitive soft button could make this worse or fix the issue completely.
Random thought I know, just trying to think about all the things that may go right or wrong with it. Phil got me with the phrase, "all those people that got the iUP last year get the new phone this year so you should too". Darn it, I know it's a trap to sell more of these things but it was a classic Steve Jobs reality distortion. So I may jump on the bandwagon.
It's not like I wasn't already tempted with the "telescopic" lens on a mobile phone, adding water resistance, the quad core processor, the jet black color, the fancy videos (especially the one with Jony Ive saying "aluminum"), the tad increase of battery life, and the stereo speakers.
For once Apple actually impressed in my opinion. I haven't been this excited for a new iPhone since the 5.
Stereo speakers was another positive upgrade. But I'm never going to upgrade because of it. Just don't think there's enough there currently. The correlation with processor power and software is another thing that should be considered. Feels like most smart phones are super fast and are more than comfortable with handling the OS for 2 years and or so (until something gets nerfed). Is enough going to happen in the next year to make the 7 pivotal to own over a 6s or 6s+ in terms of apps and OS? I doubt it. I'm just rationalising here to be honest, it's always personal perspective - everyone has different criteria for justifying a purchase.
All of the things you mention are the types of "feature only" or "spec bump" updates that have been the definition of an "s" upgrade (until now that is). Non "s" upgrades have been accompanied by a new exterior design (i.e. Think iPhone 4, iPhone 5, iPhone 6).
IPhone 7 does not fit this pattern. The cycle has been broken. Hence, the 6ss moniker fits!
Last edited:
Yes, this line has been so overly abused it's not even funny. While true for capturing spontaneous snaps, a serious photographer plans a shoot and brings real equipment.
It's not the association I make. This is a new phone, new model. Ymmv as always.
[doublepost=1473342835][/doublepost]
That's the question right?
f/2.8 isn't bad. The bokeh (not fake bokeh) will look way more blurry despite the smaller aperture on the telephoto simply because of the longer focal length. I've always been wanting a longer focal length on a phone. I'm really not a fan of the standard focal length, it's too wide for my taste.
You're the one that claimed it wasn't an "ss" upgrade, so you must be making an association that it's a typical non "s" upgrade. It's hard to argue with historical facts though. Not saying the iPhone 7 is not a great phone, just that it fits the pattern of previous "s" upgrades in that it's a "feature only/spec bump" type of upgrade. I can't imagine a scenario where Apple will keep this same basic design for 4 straight iterations (i.e. Carrying it forward for an iPhone 7s). I think the groundwork has been laid for a major redesign in 2017.
Last edited:
Every model is a spec bump from the previous model. Your only criteria is changing the form factor. Everything changed except the form factor which is why to me it's more than a spec bump.
You're entitled to your own opinions....but not your own facts. Again, what you describe is the definition of an "s" type upgrade. Using your own words: "Everything changed except the form factor". This defines all past "s" updates.
Not trying to bash the iPhone 7. I might very well upgrade to it from my 6+. But if I do, I don't expect the current "exterior" design of the 6, 6s and 7 to last for more than a year.
This breaks the mold. Apple has broken its own strategy. And the next phone will probably have the exact same exterior dimensions.
For the first time ever I'm _not_ buying my yearly iPhone.
In fact I'm looking forward to continuing on with my iPhone 6S Plus and not having to setup a new phone.
The lack of a headphone jack killed any enthusiasm I have for upgrading. That and the fact that nothing else about the phone is compelling.
In fact I'm looking forward to continuing on with my iPhone 6S Plus and not having to setup a new phone.
The lack of a headphone jack killed any enthusiasm I have for upgrading. That and the fact that nothing else about the phone is compelling.
I love how you conveniently leave out waterproofing, stereo speakers, bigger capacity base model and bigger battery. All updates that otherwise would make android fans spew liquid from their private parts.
Now that's the first thing you've said that I agree with;--)Good thing about opinions is you don't have to.
Is water resistant not water proof. There is a difference. Waterproof u can use your device under the water, water resistant no.