I love how Apple negotiating with a book company is presumed to mean that they are producing a kindle competitor. The tablet has been rumored since the 1990s... its quite possible that the device for reading these books will be iPhones/iPod Touches and Macintoshes!
Many times e-books cost MORE than their paperback counterparts. And while Amazon has gotten new "best sellers" down to $9.99,
the vast public are not blessed with eyes capable of reading long term on a backlit LCD screen.
I can see schools picking up on this fast.
It wouldn't surprise me if a brief demonstration of the next version of the App developer kit is given on the 27th. Probably to include a publication framework facilitating ;
1) Book Builder (with animated graphic inserts)
2) Magazine & Newspaper Builder (full embedded Ad framework, video, motion graphics and audio. Monthly subs right from your iTunes account)
3) Catalogue builder (integrated shopping cart for mail order firms)
4) Academic Library creator - digitised textbooks PURCHASED by UNIVERSITIES and loaded out by certified university students within iTunes
and a ton of Apple things we haven't even thought of all integrated into Apple's 'Book Store'
So, do you think Apple is going to release a $1,000 tablet with a black and white e-ink screen for "readability" that takes a second to refresh? Or do you think they're going to release it with some cutting edge OLED screen that is full color and can be refreshed fast, but isn't being manufactured in sizes larger than 4" diagonal and can't be read outdoors?
I know that many here would love Apple to bring something to the textbook market that would drive down prices for students but don't get your hopes up. Textbooks are the least competitive part of the book publishing business. Even though there are a number of publishers, each company holds a virtual monopoly in its area. That's why textbooks are ridiculously priced.
Any real innovation in the area of book publishing (and in newspapers and magazines, as well) will come where the competition is the most intense. Fiction is the best example: publishers hold monopolies on an individual book, maybe even an individual author, but not a whole category. A reader has choice. In textbooks there is no such thing as choice, if you need a particular book for your chemistry class you MUST get that book. The publisher will gouge you whether you want it in print or in e-book form. (That's why the big publishers love the mega-hit books, they are as close as they ever come to have a monopoly in the fiction category.)
That's why HarperCollins makes a good choice for Apple to work with. McGraw-Hill, Pearson, Wiley would not be as interested in new models. (Disclosure: I used to work for McGraw-Hill.)
What I want to see next week is not only a great tablet, but a demonstration of its use in e-publishing that is more than just a flip book, more than just fancy page turning. I would think Jobs could demonstrate an issue of a magazine like Wired that was specially designed for the tablet (there has been rumors that the Condé Nast magazine has been working with Apple since last fall). The demonstration would not only show the magazine like it appears in print, but also in a new layout (you can see several videos of magazine demos on my YouTube channel - the Bonnier one seems to capture the spirit of innovation the best), complete with embedded video and links, new content, the ability to link to and purchase advertised items right from the page, etc.
I know that many here would love Apple to bring something to the textbook market that would drive down prices for students but don't get your hopes up. Textbooks are the least competitive part of the book publishing business. Even though there are a number of publishers, each company holds a virtual monopoly in its area. That's why textbooks are ridiculously priced.
Any real innovation in the area of book publishing (and in newspapers and magazines, as well) will come where the competition is the most intense. Fiction is the best example: publishers hold monopolies on an individual book, maybe even an individual author, but not a whole category. A reader has choice. In textbooks there is no such thing as choice, if you need a particular book for your chemistry class you MUST get that book. The publisher will gouge you whether you want it in print or in e-book form. (That's why the big publishers love the mega-hit books, they are as close as they ever come to have a monopoly in the fiction category.)
That's why HarperCollins makes a good choice for Apple to work with. McGraw-Hill, Pearson, Wiley would not be as interested in new models. (Disclosure: I used to work for McGraw-Hill.)
What I want to see next week is not only a great tablet, but a demonstration of its use in e-publishing that is more than just a flip book, more than just fancy page turning. I would think Jobs could demonstrate an issue of a magazine like Wired that was specially designed for the tablet (there has been rumors that the Condé Nast magazine has been working with Apple since last fall). The demonstration would not only show the magazine like it appears in print, but also in a new layout (you can see several videos of magazine demos on my YouTube channel - the Bonnier one seems to capture the spirit of innovation the best), complete with embedded video and links, new content, the ability to link to and purchase advertised items right from the page, etc.
This does have the potential to drive down text book prices in the same way that the app store has cheap programs
If its opened up to book writers as easily as it is to app writers. There are 100's of thousands of teachers and lecturers who produce materials, worksheets powerpoints and revision guides, for free atm. If they are allowed to electronically publish this material via itunes for a few or a few tens of dollars, then the flood gates open.
The large corporations will be forced to compete and text book prices will drop.
This could be a game changer.
Regards
John.
ive never really had much interest in ebooks or magazines, but reading this article kinda got me excited to see how the tablet interfaces with them.
Sure, anything is possible, but likely? No. Reading a book on an iPod/iPhone or computer is a skill set only a small percentage of the population possess. Maybe you are one of these lucky people, but the vast public are not blessed with eyes capable of reading long term on a backlit LCD screen.
There are Kindle apps for the PC, Mac, and iPhone, but those compliment the Kindle, the primary intended hardware for reading the downloaded book.
The large corporations will be forced to compete and text book prices will drop.
This could be a game changer.
Why isn't anyone talking about the real way the iTablet could revolutionize education: with eLearning that finally lives up to its promise? There's the game changer for you.
Educational tablet computing has vastly more potential than merely serving as an electronic equivalent to the college textbook, historically the king of sleepy time.
Name one reason why educational tablet (with limited input capabilities, in a static environment - desk and a chair) is better than educational notebook?
Name one reason why educational tablet (with limited input capabilities, in a static environment - desk and a chair) is better than educational notebook?
There are many downsides, however (poor input capabilities- particularly for non-text things like equations, molecular diagrams, etc., slow sequential page access - much easier to thumb through a book, screen is smaller than most textbooks - particularly engineering textbooks, etc.)
I don't really understand the question (I was talking about textbooks, not notebooks), ...
So you believe pencil on paper is the pinnacle of human note taking? There's no reason the input capabilities of an electronic device can't equal it. And will, someday.
My point is that if we really wanted to get rid of text books and notepads the best substitution would be a laptop not an iPad
I disagree. A laptop is a kludge. Perhaps a kludge that will remain necessary for a few more years, but a kludge nonetheless. A well-executed tablet computer is the ideal.
How many laptops did you see them carrying around on Star Trek? 😛
I'd hardly set my idea of technical perfection based on a paradigm in which wearing a red shirt equals certain death.
I disagree. A laptop is a kludge. Perhaps a kludge that will remain necessary for a few more years, but a kludge nonetheless. A well-executed tablet computer is the ideal.
Not really. I type much faster and much more legibly than I hand write. A laptop is a superior note taking device for the vast majority of people. Not to mention, you can do much better content creation on a laptop than any kind of tablet. I would much prefer have all my textbooks as ebooks on my laptop, along with my term paper which I could mark-up in LaTeX.
We just need some good note taking software that makes drawing diagrams and writing mathematical equations as fast and efficient as typing.
Not to mention TeX is already very good at Math :
http://web.ift.uib.no/Teori/KURS/WRK/TeX/symALL.html