If they released both a version with Iris Pro and a dGPU with hd4600, it might result in that real professionals should pick the Iris Pro while gamers keep going for nvidia.
i hope they do this
If they released both a version with Iris Pro and a dGPU with hd4600, it might result in that real professionals should pick the Iris Pro while gamers keep going for nvidia.
i hope they do this
Very well said sir!!
Not to mention that PS4 and XBOXONE are around the corner!!...
Dropping a dGPU from the 15" is an insane notion. Do you people have any idea as to how much Nvidia and AMD/ATI have come with allowing various programs to use the GPU for additonal processing? Sure a nice integrated solution can do the same but it doesnt make sense. Ok I get these arent gaming laptops, thats been established for quite some time, but don't try and say there are NO video professionals that use 15" MacBook Pro's for editing! FCP X is amazing and with a proper GPU its even better, I don't think an iGPU is going to touch a dGPU, especially one made by a company like Nvidia that knows what they are doing. I wanted to avoid this thread because I KNEW it was just going to be a mess but some of these comments are rediculous.
Actually, they are not. The Iris Pro integrated GPU matches and exceeds the performance of the 750M for any application that uses OpenCL, like Photoshop. It's a close call otherwise. The only area where it is "significantly" worse (about 30%) is gaming at high resolutions. But as you said, MacBook Pros aren't for gaming.
I can't see Apple making an awful choice one way or the other.
Come on everyone who voted gather round and find your name :
https://forums.macrumors.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=10412
Did you get it right ?
Did you get it wrong ? (no shame as long as you were nice about it)
Come on everyone who voted gather round and find your name :
https://forums.macrumors.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=10412
Did you get it right ?
Did you get it wrong ? (no shame as long as you were nice about it)