Yes, that's a really good point! The traditional watchmakers haven't done so good when trying to compete by making their own smartwatches.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Have you considered going back to a mechanical watch?
- Thread starter The Cockney Rebel
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes, that's a really good point! The traditional watchmakers haven't done so good when trying to compete by making their own smartwatches.
Coincidentally, I saw something a few days ago on this topic on an Ernie Hudson interview for Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire. The interviewer noticed Ernie was wearing a watch on both his wrists. Ernie said that the AW was his computer to do everything he needed to and stay in touch with everyone.
The other “mechanical” watch was because he loved his expensive watch collection. No reason not to have two watches if you really need the benefits of both I guess?
While I would love a brietling, the functionality of the ultra trumps style. Even with apple ruining the UX in watch OS 10, it's still close to the most perfect product they've ever made.
I’m wearing the same Apple Watch S5 I’ve been wearing since 2019. It’s not a product that I’ve felt offers a very compelling case to upgrade.
So if it were to die, would I replace it? I honestly don’t know. But unlike many in this thread, fancy mechanical watches are also outside of my range. Some of the brands people talk about are pricier than if I bought a base S9.
I was wearing an automatic Fossil watch I had received as a gift. I could go back to that, I suppose. No shame in it!
So if it were to die, would I replace it? I honestly don’t know. But unlike many in this thread, fancy mechanical watches are also outside of my range. Some of the brands people talk about are pricier than if I bought a base S9.
I was wearing an automatic Fossil watch I had received as a gift. I could go back to that, I suppose. No shame in it!
Price is one of the main reasons I feel nice watches are a turn off. Additionally, why wear a cheap watch when you could wear an Apple Watch? Even my small collection rivals the price of a nice car so I completely agree that someone who doesn’t want to spend the money or care should concern themselves. If I didn’t have “nice” watches I would wear no watch.
I had to admit to myself that I got too old for tiny devices, so ......
;JOOP!
I used to swap between my apple watch and a very basic casio digital because the band would irritate my wrist.
Then i discovered the nylon woven band with no irritation and wear my apple watch nearly 24/7
Then i discovered the nylon woven band with no irritation and wear my apple watch nearly 24/7
I will not return to a mechanical watch for daily timekeeping. However, when I need to attend a formal or special event, I will wear a mechanical watch. I'll probably wear the Apple Watch on the opposite wrist.
I'd stopped wearing my Tag prior to getting a Pebble, which turned out to be the gateway drug for the Apple Watch.
I'm not into jewelry, so that's a definite no. I can't imagine giving up all the functions that my AW provides.
... and an APPLE watch looks too expensive (like ROLEX), it may be good, but it will attract thieves.
My stupid CASIO is safe on my wrist.
;JOOP!
I don’t think Apple could ever make a smartwatch that looked as good as a Rolex to be fair, but it’s a throwaway gadget in the longterm and won’t be as attractive to thieves due to how easy they are to brick once nicked.
The world’s biggest selling smartwatch, and basically useless as a stolen device. I wonder how many actually do get stolen?
Very few in the grand scheme. The Apple Watch is also one of the worse Apple products for depreciation in the legit secondhand market too, so it’s less attractive to thieves I would think. I hear many stories of thieves mugging people at knife point for their Swiss mechanicals but never for a smartwatch. When you consider one can be traded on the black market and only a risk of its sent for service and the other will be locked via a passcode, the AW is pretty useless to anybody but the owner.
What data does Oura not provide that AW does? (Because I'm considering this approach, with Garmin watch for workouts possibly)
I’ve been double wristing it myself lately. Get the health benefits of wearing the AW and the digital detox and analog benefits of mostly checking a mechanical watch for the time…. Recommend!
I enjoyed having nearly this same chat before, when you posted back on Jan 5, 2024
But for the sake of other readers in Horology, I'll reiterate Cartier was nowhere near "the first" wristwatch, nor did Cartier invent the concept.
The very first documented wristwatches were one-offs by Breguet (in the early 1800's for some nobility in Italy, IIRC). Patek Philippe also did something for a Hungarian royalty of that era. Wristwatches were first manufactured as jewelry for women. Men eventually picked up wristwatches as military equipment in late 19th century.
It is generally accepted that Louis Cartier was the first to publicize the "Santos" design, which he built in the early 19-naughts, specifically with a pilot in mind, his friend, the eponymous Albert Santos Dumont. The "Santos" model was later manufactures collaboration with Edmond Jaeger (later of Jaeger LeCoultre) in 19... 10-15.
If I were to invest in a Cartier, it would be the Roadster Chronograph.
My opinions, FWIW, in that old thread were in good company with other keen observers, several of whom seem to have reappeared in this thread, too. Hello, nice to see you again 👋.
- Jan 6, 2024 about watches I wear
- Jan 7, 2024 about horological anachronism
- Jan 7, 2024 About double-wristing
Data is similar (heart rate, estimated calorie burned, sleep data) with a couple of things that I don't think Apple Watch does - or at least didn't when I stopped wearing my Series 3 (Heart Rate Variability, Respiratory rate). I think Watch does V2O Max now which Oura doesn't have, but when I talk about health and fitness it's more of the extras EKG, blood oxygen, a fib detection, fall detection etc. that I wish I had. But not wish I had enough to stop wearing mechanical watches.
Also, this is totally subjective, but I also don't really like the Oura app. It's just ok. I really look at the Oura data in Health rather than jump into the Oura app - something about it just rubs me the wrong way.
I was just thinking about the main reason why I wear a smart watch. To track my steps. Then I just realized that my phone can track my steps too, as long as it's on me. Which it is 95% of the time. I may go back to my Invicta watch just to compare the data that my phone collects for my steps.
Hell no. Not even for a second.
I had stopped wearing mechanical watches for years before the Apple Watch was released.
I had stopped wearing mechanical watches for years before the Apple Watch was released.
I occasionally think about it but stick to my Apple Watch as it attracts less attention by the nefarious.