Here's How Much the Inside of an iPhone Has Changed in Ten Years

Sure.

"In the days of yore other manufacturers DESIGNED their own silicon, most notably IBM (who also DESIGNED their own disk drives and just about everything else that went into their PCs until the early 2000s)"

Anything else? Shall I serve crackers?
I was simply asking you to clarify because as you can clearly see from just this thread there are plenty of technologically illiterate members here just waiting to pounce on statements they willfully misunderstand. I didn't want you to give them that opening to suck you into a semantic back and forth. Thought I was doing you a favor.

It wasn't a knock at you in anyway, don't know where the snark needs to come in, we both are on the same page buddy.
 
This is quite a testament to the design of the iPhone 4. That iPhones 7 years later largely retain the same internal layout is impressive.
 
You are incorrect sir. Apple pushed all those companies to achieve most of those advances. It's been a while now since Apple used off the shelf components, at least for the ones that do make a difference, like screen, camera sensor, etc.

About the battery you are correct: A11 Bionic is so crazily efficient they maintained battery life even with less mAh, in spite of 70% more processing power, crazy right? iPhone X 2 additional hours are thanks to OLED though. You forgot to mention that, right?

Still, I believe hardware is getting so ahead of other manufacturers that the discussion is being turned into this, hardware feats, when the true advantage is in the hardware/software integration which no other company can even dream about.
Any iPhone user who's been a customer for the last 10 years will tell you we don't give a dam about Mhz, Megapixels or mAh. And in the last 4 or 5 years, every person I know who migrated from Android agrees too.
That’s funny, I see the opposite happening over here. But you have to consider that the iPhone 7 here (not the 7 plus) is even more expensive as a Samsung Galaxy S8. And when you compare those two, the decision is easily made.
 
I would be interested in Apple Watch Series 10 Vs. 1st Gen comparison. Every freaking year, the watch keeps getting thicker and thicker. I was looking at my first gen watch the other day and oh boy it was MUCH thinner in my opinion.
Factually, from series 0/1 to series 2/3 it’s gone from 10.5mm to 11.4mm in thickness (was 8% thinner before).

As to how to describe that difference, opinions will vary. Some might not even notice the difference at all; or say it used to be somewhat thinner, or maybe say it was a lot thinner, or much thinner before.

On the MacRumors forum, the new watch is “tremendously” thicker; it’s “horrible” and definitely a sign that Ive’s been spending way too much time designing the new Apple “donut” and that Apple can’t innovate.

Some will declare they’ll never buy an Apple Watch until it’s back to 10.5mm thick. And of course, Tim Cook should be fired.
 
Last edited:
Only thing that hasn't changed is the terrible battery life. Can't believe we are still using battery tech that's decades old.
Yeah, let's hope somewhere there's a team working on some breakthrough battery tech that will make staring often at your battery percentage during the day a thing of the past.
 
It makes it pretty clear how advanced the original iPhone was when it was released.

No 3G, GPS, front camera, multitasking, videocam, third party apps... it was pretty far behind in ways that mattered to many of us who waited until it caught up a bit.

It was actually far behind windows phones of the time
EXCEPT
It had capacitive touch screen and pinch to zoom.
Resistive screens on Windows phones were terrible.

True, most were insensitive because they were meant for a stylus or fingernail. OTOH, the Samsung smartphone I was using at the time actually had a pretty sensitive resistive screen. Perhaps because Samsung was already including some finger friendly apps in it.

Interestingly, someone later showed a resistive screen that was so sensitive, it could detect the individual bristles of an artist's paintbrush. It's really too bad in some ways that other phone makers dropped a lot of cool R&D to follow each other.

All Microsoft had to do was add capacitive screen and pinch zoom and they would have pounded iPhone into the dirt.

Instead they gave thousands of Windows Mobile developers the finger and ditched the OS. The developers, including myself, never came back when they released the new platform.

Exactly! Ditto for Blackberry, who dropped their Java OS to create another.

The moment that Microsoft and RIM did those things, they lost their valuable footholds both in the US enterprise market, and in consumer markets in other countries.
 
Purposely disabling the FM radio to keep Apple Music & carrier data use which keeps the money rolling in, still the same. CA wildfires people may have used it.
 
Purposely disabling the FM radio to keep Apple Music & carrier data use which keeps the money rolling in, still the same. CA wildfires people may have used it.

You are way out of order here. This was during Apple’s halcyon days of Steve Jobs, before the bad times...before the TIM.
 
Only thing that hasn't changed is the terrible battery life. Can't believe we are still using battery tech that's decades old.
Figure out that problem and make a billion dollars! Seriously, companies are spending that yearly to bend, stretch, and squeeze the current tech as much as they can.
[doublepost=1507857141][/doublepost]
The design of the 3G/S is still my favorite out of all the iPhones. It was just the right size, IMO, and was extremely comfortable to hold.
It was like a worrystone. I would catch myself just fidgeting with it because it was sized and curved just right. The curved backs back then felt more “touchy” than the very flat ones we have now.
 
And the point I'm making is people need to stop thinking that Apple invented, designed, developed, and fabricated the LCD display, CPU, camera, touch screen, GPS, etc. Brilliant engineers all over the world did that. That is *real* engineering. Steve Jobs yelling at a developer or bullying suppliers into exclusive, cheap cost deals, hoarding DRAM and locking out other buyers, and hiring slave labor in China is more of what Apple is about. It's capitalism. It's business.

This romanticization of Apple as the do-gooder, the benevolent creator of your coveted devices is getting out of hand.

Ah, another day on MacRumors, another hateful troll...
 
Wow, technology has gotten better in the last 10 years - thanks to shrinking silicon processes (TSMC, UMC, Intel, Samsung), LCD technology (Sharp, Samsung, LG), Chip design and integration innovation (Samsung, Qualcomm, ARM, Broadcom), and camera technology (Sony).

Nowhere do I see Apple, except taking that technology and putting it in a shiny rectangle. Well, they *do* write the software.

How about a photo showing how the battery got smaller from the 7 to the 8? Progress!

Big omission on your part. Starting with the A4 chip, it is all Apple designed processors compatibe with the ARM instruction set. Samsung does not design their own processors. The differentiating thing today is Apple’s lead in the microprocessor.
 
Ah, another day on MacRumors, another hateful troll...

Rose-coloured glasses slipping? Original iPhone didn't have copy & paste for a while. Under the "everyone copies iPhone" when a feature is added to an Android phone, same can be said about c&p.

www.engadget.com/amp/2009/03/17/iphone-finally-gets-copy-and-paste/

Here, I'll throw you a little red meat: Face ID wasn't available on iPhone. Now there's rumours ALL iPhones 2018 will abandon Touch ID. The original iPhone wasn't perfect & the iPhone X won't be. Perhaps you'd be more open to actual pros & cons.
 
Gotta give credit where it is due. That Taptic Engine does not get enough praise, and I think it is truly evolutionary. Does anyone remember what an old haptic felt like? Seriously Apple should have won an award for creating the Taptic Engine.
 
Whatever happens to fuel cell technology? A few ounces of hydrogen could power your iPhone for a week.
[doublepost=1507867729][/doublepost]
Gotta give credit where it is due. That Taptic Engine does not get enough praise, and I think it is truly evolutionary. Does anyone remember what an old haptic felt like? Seriously Apple should have won an award for creating the Taptic Engine.
It works well on my 7 unless I'm in a vehicle or shaky environment and I find myself pressing it and thinking nothing happened. Almost like it feels when it's off. And I have it on the highest setting.
 
Steve Jobs would have loved how the inside has developed aestheticly, as he always promoted that product should be as beautiful on the inside as the outside.
 
Ten years later and it's still a rounded rectangle with electronics inside and a touchscreen! Literally nothing has changed! Therefore, Apple is clearly dooomed!

(... am I doing it right?)
[doublepost=1507874644][/doublepost]
Aside from all the technology incorporated into today's latest generation iPhone, take a second and reflect on how thin these devices really are. Even the iPad, incredibly thin and less than an inch thick. We live in some fascinating times where phones are more powerful, thin and lightweight over computers ten years ago.
Every so often it occurs to me that if I could take my iPhone back in time to the 12 year old Star Trek-loving version of me, and show it to young self, and explain what it can do, and then that as an iPhone 6 it's a 3 year old mass-produced model that's not up to current standards... twelve-year-old me would absolutely insist that such a device couldn't possibly be from the year 2017, but rather from 2517. Because it's so unbelievably far beyond the future that Star Trek painted for me (which got me into both electronic projects and programming). Back then, nobody had a computer at home, and computer storage was measured in kilobytes, and most computers were closer in size to refrigerators. The Apple II came out around then, with a mighty one megahertz 8-bit CPU. Now I've got a thin little rectangle with a photorealistic screen that's also the keyboard, gigabytes of storage, a 1.4 gigahertz 64-bit CPU, voice recognition, and it taps into an ever-present worldwide network that can nearly instantly answer any question, provide any piece of information, play any song or movie, and connect me with millions of other people (and we mostly use the technology for watching cat videos). To twelve year old me, the iPhone clearly won't be possible for at least another 500 years.
 
Last edited:
Only thing that hasn't changed is the terrible battery life. Can't believe we are still using battery tech that's decades old.

Your car is using "Battery Tech" that is 150 years old. Lithium Ion chemistry is more like 25 years old. ;)

The chemistry doesn't change much. Electrochemistry has massive development cycles. Lithium Ion is largely a package-engineering exercise. That said, the energy density of Lithium Ion has nearly doubled in the last decade.

It would be vastly more beneficial to address the huge power draw of the antennaes.
 
Only thing that hasn't changed is the terrible battery life. Can't believe we are still using battery tech that's decades old.

Many nerds working on it. Apple specifically has a thinness fetish that became absurd after the iPhone 5.
 
Looking at the bottom of the iPhone 8 makes me wonder how long the lightning port is going to survive now that wireless charging is coming in. Getting rid of it would also force people with accessories such as a camera adapter who still want to plug in a USB device to buy a new wireless version and Apple love doing things that force people to buy new accessories.

With the lightning connector gone, and even better if the haptic engine could be engineered down in size a bit, that would give a decent bit of extra space for a bigger battery and if the SIM card slot also goes and with non rectangular shaped batteries now on the scene it could get even bigger.
 
Wait, the tagline of the 3G is something like "twice the speed for half the price" but the retail prices shown in the article are $499 for the original iPhone and $599 for the 3G... Did i miss something or is it a typo?! o_O
 
Only thing that hasn't changed is the terrible battery life. Can't believe we are still using battery tech that's decades old.
Battery technology has been improving every year. It could have been better but R&D is not lacking in this area. You forgot to mention that they crammed all the power hungry chips in there as well. If you put the new battery technology on that old iPhone. You can easily double the life of those devices.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top