Apparently, meaning that it’s claimed by Apple that 68% recycled materials is used but no one has dug into what that entails or recycled from where."apparently" There you go again.
That particular word is defined as "How to lie with statistics"
FWIW the same reference that Antifa posited gives the carbon cost of producing fabric as HIGHER that that of producing leather.
The point I’m making is that even in the scenario where the band’s recycled materials still produces some emissions it would still be less emissions than tanning leather. Even if the recycled portion saves on, say only 30% of emissions from using recycled materials, it would still be less.
Last edited: