With that being said, it's a first Gen product and you can't expect any company to get it right with their first iteration. Any new technology is going to be expensive in the beginning. Let's see how Apple does with the AVP once it gets to Gen 3-4-5.Yeah, it's an "almost" product.
Almost light enough, almost cheap enough, almost enough users to drive software & content development.
And almost understood. It's a portable face computer, with multiple "monitors" built-in (or an immersive IMAX+ screen), the mouse/trackpad is replaced by your eyes, and the keyboard is (eventually) replaced by your voice.
If you have a multiple monitor set-up, or travel, the AVP is *almost* killer. A couple generations out, and nobody even flinches at $3999 (fully loaded with eye inserts).
I am fully aware that we, the first-generation AVP owners, serve as “testers” for the future, and that is perfectly acceptable. Considering the current economic climate and the price of $3,499, I understand why it failed to sell millions of units. To achieve widespread adoption, the price needs to be significantly reduced, possibly to under $2,000. While the Pro model may not see such a price drop, the Air model might.
Considering the circumstances, it was probably best that it didn’t achieve widespread adoption because the VisionOS App Store wasn’t ready for it. Although it’s getting better, we’re still a couple of years away from it being truly decent.
I tried one a few months ago at a friend's house. They really don't work with contact lenses - it was ok, but regularly had problems tracking my eyes. I also really didn't like the AR view - everything looked pixelated, and it had just enough lag to make me slightly motion sick. When full video was going, it was incredibly immersive, but I did end up with a headache and eye strain that lasted a few hours.
All in all, a promising prototype, but it needs a lot of work before I'd buy one.
never had this experience with mine, and definitely NEVER pixelated - find it odd. Love the quality and the surround vision is amazing.I tried one a few months ago at a friend's house. They really don't work with contact lenses - it was ok, but regularly had problems tracking my eyes. I also really didn't like the AR view - everything looked pixelated, and it had just enough lag to make me slightly motion sick. When full video was going, it was incredibly immersive, but I did end up with a headache and eye strain that lasted a few hours.
All in all, a promising prototype, but it needs a lot of work before I'd buy one.
As I noted, I use my AVP with contacts almost every day and have not experienced any of the issues that user reported. I also think there would have been stories in the media if that were actually the case for even a significant minority of contact lens users.That’s crazy. So it seems the need to have the corrective lenses is not to just make more $$$ but the tech isn’t ready for the various types of contact lenses and such..fascinating…Great post.
I have one - we should connect - not far from you in South Carolina. I tried to email you via your site...Even though I know I can’t get one financially, I was so excited to watch the keynote when they announced it. I didn't care what it looked like or cost really, I was just happy to see something entirely new. Me and my son who loves watching Apple videos went to the closest Apple Store for a demo. It was so cool. As a sports fan, the clip of the guy getting thrown out at first was enough for me. My son enjoyed his demo. Then, we took it off and walked away knowing in 2024 that is a close as we'd come.
But who knows in a few years what things will look like. Or at least when my son is my age. A generation ago, people stood, cheered, and pumped their fist in the air when a computer said "never trust a computer you can’t lift." They went crazy. And today, I'm sitting at a booth eating lunch with a 2 lb laptop tethered wirelessly to a phone that has internet that hits crazy speed when just a few years ago it seems I was ecstatic when I got cable broadband that hit 1mb.
I don’t know many (or any really) tech folk, but I do have John Couch's number. I text him this week about the anniversary of the Apple Lisa and congratulated him on the Lisa anniversary… another device that had "low sales" but paved the way for some great things…
Insanely great.
What? Can you not read?Am I supposed to have a vision headset on to read this??
What? Can you not read?
Same. At first I thought it was some kind of statement regarding the technology, but then I realized it was me using dark mode 🤣Yeah it’s a real difficult read. I’m on control center dark mode btw. Peace
I knew it'd be a niche product.
But I also expected a much cheaper and improved second model to boost adoption and development, like it happened with basically all other Apple products.
Very good point. I imagine there's reasons why they marketed toward the mass consumer market (stock value, viral marketing, or see if consumers will shell out $3,500 for this kind of tech).All it ever needed was a marketing pivot to industry rather than consumer. I want to be able to see a CAD model in AR simultaneously with other AVP users so that we can manipulate it between ourselves in realtime, editing faces etc and everyone gets the same view. I don't need to put a clock on my wall.
Many people keep forgetting that there is a limited supply of certain, unique components of the AVP. I think the 8k screens are the main ones.
It is a chicken-and-egg situation where the investment required of suppliers to 10x the supply doesn't yet make financial sense...at least not yet. So Apple really isn't trying to sell 5 million units...because it can't.
Two years in...Apple has enough in the field to supply developers and early-adopter/testers. Heck, Blackmagic just started shipping the $35k camera to make immersive video. The footage I've seen is really, really good - but $35k makes the AVP look like an inexpensive add-on.
And I'll keep saying this until Apple hears me - the real killer app is telepresence. When I visit places in the AVP (with footage shot via Canon R5 or better), my brain thinks that I've been there. There's only so much time, money, access to travel to all the places I want to be -- telepresence via AVP makes it relatively inexpensive, easy, and convenient.
Last week, I rode a camel in the Sahara without getting hot or dirty...or smelling the camel. That was 'good enough' for me. It is not the same as actually flying to Africa and doing it - but so, so much cheaper and faster and easier.
And it is A LOT better that viewing the same thing on a flat screen. To me - it is night and day. I've never watched a movie and thought "I've been there". With AVP, I feel like I have.
On top of that, the Apple Immersive content is simply stunning - much of that is something I could never experience myself, regardless of time or budget.
And finally, I can do it all for 15 minutes at a time.
I also had the original iPhone and launch day Apple Watch. As you mention, both were limited and clunky, especially the first Apple Watch. But I used them every single day and was itching to get the newer models when they came out to overcome those limitations. Especially for the watch. Whereas for the Vision Pro I was way more blown away on day 1 with how impressive the experience seemed in comparison to other products. But after a month or so it became an effort to use it, and I found myself doing so just to justify the cost. And slowly reducing usage. Now it sits in a drawer and I don’t remember the last time I used it. I can’t see myself upgrading, even if it fixes some of the limitations, because I don’t really have a use for it.As an owner of the original Apple Watch and iPhone, both of those were pretty average products (slow, not great battery, limited functionality), but paved the way for what are now today incredible products. While price is a huge barrier to entry for Apple Vision, I think they will get it right in the long-run.