Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have "only" these complaints:

- Price
- Weight
- Field of vision way too narrow
- Cameras' quality too low: I can easily see the grainy effect, even at great light conditions.
 
Even though I know I can’t get one financially, I was so excited to watch the keynote when they announced it. I didn't care what it looked like or cost really, I was just happy to see something entirely new. Me and my son who loves watching Apple videos went to the closest Apple Store for a demo. It was so cool. As a sports fan, the clip of the guy getting thrown out at first was enough for me. My son enjoyed his demo. Then, we took it off and walked away knowing in 2024 that is a close as we'd come.

But who knows in a few years what things will look like. Or at least when my son is my age. A generation ago, people stood, cheered, and pumped their fist in the air when a computer said "never trust a computer you can’t lift." They went crazy. And today, I'm sitting at a booth eating lunch with a 2 lb laptop tethered wirelessly to a phone that has internet that hits crazy speed when just a few years ago it seems I was ecstatic when I got cable broadband that hit 1mb.

I don’t know many (or any really) tech folk, but I do have John Couch's number. I text him this week about the anniversary of the Apple Lisa and congratulated him on the Lisa anniversary… another device that had "low sales" but paved the way for some great things…

Insanely great.
 
Yeah, it's an "almost" product.

Almost light enough, almost cheap enough, almost enough users to drive software & content development.

And almost understood. It's a portable face computer, with multiple "monitors" built-in (or an immersive IMAX+ screen), the mouse/trackpad is replaced by your eyes, and the keyboard is (eventually) replaced by your voice.

If you have a multiple monitor set-up, or travel, the AVP is *almost* killer. A couple generations out, and nobody even flinches at $3999 (fully loaded with eye inserts).
With that being said, it's a first Gen product and you can't expect any company to get it right with their first iteration. Any new technology is going to be expensive in the beginning. Let's see how Apple does with the AVP once it gets to Gen 3-4-5.

Patience. It's not like there's any other headset on the market right now that is as powerful as the AVP. It sure isn't my Quest 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoSoup4U
It's a good investment. It will pay off. But yeah it's not a mass market product, way too expensive. I will eventually get myself a pair but not for anything in the $3000 dollar range. When it get's down to less than $1000 perhaps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
I'm ready to buy one, but they need to update it first. I think there are probably a lot of people like me who are just waiting for the second iteration. It's still on an M1 chip. My luck, I buy it tomorrow, and then they announce a new one next week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
Sheesh, folks, Tim Cook has been clear from the get go. The Apple Vision Pro is the best-in-class product that is changing the game, because the era of spatial compositing is here. Everybody who is anybody knows this means the Apple Vision Pro is a product for techies on the bleeding edge who want to try tomorrow’s technology, today, with a beta product.
 
I am fully aware that we, the first-generation AVP owners, serve as “testers” for the future, and that is perfectly acceptable. Considering the current economic climate and the price of $3,499, I understand why it failed to sell millions of units. To achieve widespread adoption, the price needs to be significantly reduced, possibly to under $2,000. While the Pro model may not see such a price drop, the Air model might.

Considering the circumstances, it was probably best that it didn’t achieve widespread adoption because the VisionOS App Store wasn’t ready for it. Although it’s getting better, we’re still a couple of years away from it being truly decent.

Am I supposed to have a vision headset on to read this??…


I tried one a few months ago at a friend's house. They really don't work with contact lenses - it was ok, but regularly had problems tracking my eyes. I also really didn't like the AR view - everything looked pixelated, and it had just enough lag to make me slightly motion sick. When full video was going, it was incredibly immersive, but I did end up with a headache and eye strain that lasted a few hours.

All in all, a promising prototype, but it needs a lot of work before I'd buy one.

That’s crazy. So it seems the need to have the corrective lenses is not to just make more $$$ but the tech isn’t ready for the various types of contact lenses and such..fascinating…Great post.


And yeah mos def needs more work before a serious purchase but in the meantime I’m contemplating buying this and a PlayStation VR 2 from the Sony direct website and just return them both but not before comparing how movies look on them and then comparing the two…sounds exciting!
 
I tried one a few months ago at a friend's house. They really don't work with contact lenses - it was ok, but regularly had problems tracking my eyes. I also really didn't like the AR view - everything looked pixelated, and it had just enough lag to make me slightly motion sick. When full video was going, it was incredibly immersive, but I did end up with a headache and eye strain that lasted a few hours.

All in all, a promising prototype, but it needs a lot of work before I'd buy one.
never had this experience with mine, and definitely NEVER pixelated - find it odd. Love the quality and the surround vision is amazing.
 
That’s crazy. So it seems the need to have the corrective lenses is not to just make more $$$ but the tech isn’t ready for the various types of contact lenses and such..fascinating…Great post.
As I noted, I use my AVP with contacts almost every day and have not experienced any of the issues that user reported. I also think there would have been stories in the media if that were actually the case for even a significant minority of contact lens users.

Again, I am not saying the other poster didn't experience those issues, I suspect he did. I am just not sure it is related to contacts.
 
Even though I know I can’t get one financially, I was so excited to watch the keynote when they announced it. I didn't care what it looked like or cost really, I was just happy to see something entirely new. Me and my son who loves watching Apple videos went to the closest Apple Store for a demo. It was so cool. As a sports fan, the clip of the guy getting thrown out at first was enough for me. My son enjoyed his demo. Then, we took it off and walked away knowing in 2024 that is a close as we'd come.

But who knows in a few years what things will look like. Or at least when my son is my age. A generation ago, people stood, cheered, and pumped their fist in the air when a computer said "never trust a computer you can’t lift." They went crazy. And today, I'm sitting at a booth eating lunch with a 2 lb laptop tethered wirelessly to a phone that has internet that hits crazy speed when just a few years ago it seems I was ecstatic when I got cable broadband that hit 1mb.

I don’t know many (or any really) tech folk, but I do have John Couch's number. I text him this week about the anniversary of the Apple Lisa and congratulated him on the Lisa anniversary… another device that had "low sales" but paved the way for some great things…

Insanely great.
I have one - we should connect - not far from you in South Carolina. I tried to email you via your site...
 
I'm glad that they're openly stating what is obviously the case--this is an early-adopter product, not a mass-market thing. I hope most people who bought it understood that, and I certainly did when I tried to.

Which is fine--spatial computing may or may not end up being a thing, but if it is, it will be so when the hardware involved is a pair of regular glasses. The technology for that isn't here yet, and won't be for some time. I have no issue with Apple releasing what is, essentially, a prototype version for those who can make use of it now and to develop the ecosystem even if it will be years--probably a decade or more--until technology gets to where it needs to be to make this a consumer product.

All that said, even in the current state the virtual monitor thing is an absolute killer app for those of us who travel and/or work in small spaces that can't accommodate anything bigger than a laptop screen. Having a large multi-monitor setup that I can pack in a carry-on and use literally anywhere is a dream come true for remote work and travel.

...or would be if they would make the dang thing compatible with prescriptions with mild prism. That stupid limitation of the Zeiss inserts has left me wanting one since launch day and STILL unable to use or even buy one--Apple literally won't sell me one once I type in my prescription values.
 
Bring on the glasses! I can't wait to live in a society where people walk around talking to themselves while taking photos and videos of each other.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Morod
I knew it'd be a niche product.
But I also expected a much cheaper and improved second model to boost adoption and development, like it happened with basically all other Apple products.

This is certainty still on the way, just taking a lot longer than say from iPad to iPad 2. The tech just isn’t there yet and they launched this product very, very early in comparison to their other products. I’m hoping that strategy will pay off in the long run by building up a great ecosystem “in advance”.
 
Apple Vision Pro not requiring prescription glasses. Not for useless spatial computing. Just to watch 3D movies. And connected to Mac using USB cable.
 
All it ever needed was a marketing pivot to industry rather than consumer. I want to be able to see a CAD model in AR simultaneously with other AVP users so that we can manipulate it between ourselves in realtime, editing faces etc and everyone gets the same view. I don't need to put a clock on my wall.
Very good point. I imagine there's reasons why they marketed toward the mass consumer market (stock value, viral marketing, or see if consumers will shell out $3,500 for this kind of tech).
 
What are the health risks of wearing this thing? We have all heard to not hold the phone too close to your head or the concerns of men keeping the phone in their front pants pocket, but what about this more powerful device strapped to your head? EMFs?
 
Many people keep forgetting that there is a limited supply of certain, unique components of the AVP. I think the 8k screens are the main ones.

It is a chicken-and-egg situation where the investment required of suppliers to 10x the supply doesn't yet make financial sense...at least not yet. So Apple really isn't trying to sell 5 million units...because it can't.

Two years in...Apple has enough in the field to supply developers and early-adopter/testers. Heck, Blackmagic just started shipping the $35k camera to make immersive video. The footage I've seen is really, really good - but $35k makes the AVP look like an inexpensive add-on.

And I'll keep saying this until Apple hears me - the real killer app is telepresence. When I visit places in the AVP (with footage shot via Canon R5 or better), my brain thinks that I've been there. There's only so much time, money, access to travel to all the places I want to be -- telepresence via AVP makes it relatively inexpensive, easy, and convenient.

Last week, I rode a camel in the Sahara without getting hot or dirty...or smelling the camel. That was 'good enough' for me. It is not the same as actually flying to Africa and doing it - but so, so much cheaper and faster and easier.

And it is A LOT better that viewing the same thing on a flat screen. To me - it is night and day. I've never watched a movie and thought "I've been there". With AVP, I feel like I have.

On top of that, the Apple Immersive content is simply stunning - much of that is something I could never experience myself, regardless of time or budget.

And finally, I can do it all for 15 minutes at a time.

Could not agree more with this entire post!
 
  • Like
Reactions: anakin44011
I wonder how many $3,500 Macs they sold over that period? This is a much more niche product, I'm sure they didn't have huge numbers expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31
As an owner of the original Apple Watch and iPhone, both of those were pretty average products (slow, not great battery, limited functionality), but paved the way for what are now today incredible products. While price is a huge barrier to entry for Apple Vision, I think they will get it right in the long-run.
I also had the original iPhone and launch day Apple Watch. As you mention, both were limited and clunky, especially the first Apple Watch. But I used them every single day and was itching to get the newer models when they came out to overcome those limitations. Especially for the watch. Whereas for the Vision Pro I was way more blown away on day 1 with how impressive the experience seemed in comparison to other products. But after a month or so it became an effort to use it, and I found myself doing so just to justify the cost. And slowly reducing usage. Now it sits in a drawer and I don’t remember the last time I used it. I can’t see myself upgrading, even if it fixes some of the limitations, because I don’t really have a use for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HazeAndHahmahneez
I don’t know about ‘low sales’

🍎Vision Pro obviously has enough sales to incentivize Apple to build a specific room (within an Apple store) dedicated to Vision Pro demos:


I got to try out the Vision Pro (at that brand new Miami Apple Store) back in February when I was in FL and it was really cool 😎 especially with viewing the new ‘spatial videos’ that you can now take (on either an iPhone 15 Pro or a 16 Pro)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.