Yeah, since this is a fan site, this is the stuff we get. good the worst.People believe rumors as fact, that's what is happening.
That would be one rather expensive hub. You would have to leave the iPad plugged in and at one location "forever". Remember that a home hub is also a Thread Border Router, and it pretty much needs to stay put and always in WiFi range and Thread range at the same time. Today a the mini speaker and the ATV can both do this, and they are $100 devices. Using an iPad Pro for this is overkill, and people just would not pay for it.Another device? Can’t my iPad Pro just be my home hub?
I’ve already got the iPad Pro. And it does stay put. If it’s technically capable- why not?That would be one rather expensive hub. You would have to leave the iPad plugged in and at one location "forever". Remember that a home hub is also a Thread Border Router, and it pretty much needs to stay put and always in WiFi range and Thread range at the same time. Today a the mini speaker and the ATV can both do this, and they are $100 devices. Using an iPad Pro for this is overkill, and people just would not pay for it.
Because Apple isn’t good at managing time, or anything in general at this point
Just tonight at dinner: “Siri, volume 22”. “You want me to play music at 100%?” Oh my God, please KILL Siri!
Apple's smart home hub will likely launch in 2026, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
![]()
HomePod with a screen (concept)
In a report last week, Gurman said that Apple originally planned to announce the home hub in March this year, but he said that the device was delayed indefinitely due to its reliance on the personalized Siri features that were postponed.
In that report, he said the home hub may now arrive in the first half of next year.
Gurman revealed another related reason for the delay in his Power On newsletter today. Specifically, he said that the home hub is dependent on a new version of App Intents, which would allow Siri to more precisely control apps via voice commands. That is something that is also held up, and the home hub is in a holding pattern as a result.
Often referred to as a HomePod with a screen, Apple's home hub is rumored to feature a 6-inch to 7-inch square display, and an A18 chip for Apple Intelligence support. The device can reportedly be attached to a speaker base, or mounted on a wall, and it would allow users to control smart home accessories, make FaceTime video calls, and more. It might even double as a home security system with an optional Apple-designed smart home camera.
In March, Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said that a HomePod with a screen would enter mass production in the third quarter of 2025. However, given the personalized Siri features have yet to launch, it is unclear if that timeframe remains accurate.
Article Link: Here's Why Apple's All-New Home Hub is Delayed
I use Apple computers for at least 40 years, and these have never been more reliable than today.While that sounds nice, I think it's largely a description of Apple from the past at this point.
Apple can't guarantee that every person using an iPad as a hub will leave it at home and connected all the time; thats why hubs need to be things which are always on and connected at home.I’ve already got the iPad Pro. And it does stay put. If it’s technically capable- why not?
I don’t know. I think you are giving Apple credit for more altruism than it has. It is putting out this device and keeping us from using our iPads as Home hubs as we used to be able to do simply to sell another device. The same reason it took away the headphone jack in order to bring out AirPods. It’s all about their courage to commandeer your wallet.I think one valid point is that Apple probably doesn’t want mobile devices to be able to serve as home hubs that people can mindlessly take with them and then have home automations break unexpectedly.
The iPad is a large screen that's become relatively inexpensive. A lot of my fam and friends have ipads that just sit on their kitchen counters- no matter if it's checking their security cameras, facetiming or browsing web. Why not just allow those people to use their ipad as such?Apple can't guarantee that every person using an iPad as a hub will leave it at home and connected all the time; thats why hubs need to be things which are always on and connected at home.
The new AppleTV is $129, much less expensive than any iPad Apple sells.The iPad is a large screen that's become relatively inexpensive...
The AppleTV doesn’t have a screen on it. And I already have multiple iPads…The new AppleTV is $129, much less expensive than any iPad Apple sells.
The hub doesn't have to have a screen; you can control the hub with one of your iPads.The AppleTV doesn’t have a screen on it. And I already have multiple iPads…
Why can’t my iPad serve as the hub? It is technically capable.The hub doesn't have to have a screen; you can control the hub with one of your iPads.
Because it cant. Buy a used Apple TV for $50 and control it with your iPad.Why can’t my iPad serve as the hub? It is technically capable.
That doesn’t make sense. I already have a technically capable deviceBecause it cant. Buy a used Apple TV for $50 and control it with your iPad.
Of course it’s technically capable. For a brief while Apple allowed iPads to be home hubs. Then suddenly they took that function away from iPads. The cynic in me knows it was in order to sell an upcoming device.That doesn’t make sense. I already have a technically capable device
You need a separate hub; that's your answer.That doesn’t make sense. I already have a technically capable device