What size hole on the S/M strap do you use? I use the 4th smallest hole (the middle of the 7 holes) and the smallest hole on the M/L just fits me. It's not too loose at all. I had to ask Hermes to punch an additional hole in my single tour and it fits perfectly now.
I also used to only use the modular faces but I've fallen in love with the Hermes watch faces. I don't use the standard ones anymore unless I'm at the gym and want to track my activity rings.
The Hermes Apple Watch is an experience in itself. Can't really add up the costs of individual components to see whether it's justifiable.
I posted this Hodinkee link in another thread:
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/what-hermes-means-to-watch-collectors-apple-watch-hermes
It is an interesting and worthwhile read about the Hermes experience and what makes it unique.
Thanks for the response, as well as the link to the article. In many ways, it's not that much different than the high-end watches with a Tiffany marking.
The M/L strap would work; I use the 2nd "largest" hole on the S/M strap, but I really dislike the extra strap length of the M/L strap and would not use it on that basis alone. I generally like the Hermes faces, but mainly because Apple refuses to make available a watch face appropriately designed for a rectangular watch. I've tried some of the simpler analog faces, but I use the complications with some regularity and love the quick access from the watch face. I'd lose that with the Hermes watch faces.
I think Apple's partnering with Hermes was a masterstroke, and certainly when you go into a Hermes store to check out the Apple watches (and I have), it's a completely different experience from the Apple store. That said, and I mean no offense, a Hermes Apple Watch to me doesn't mean as much as, say, the Paul Newman Daytona or a JLC sold through Hermes, because those watches carry value completely separate from the Hermes marking. I love the Apple watches that I've owned (and I'll have owned every generation once I pick up my S3 tomorrow), but a 5 year old Apple watch will be virtually worthless functionally and monetarily, although the gold models will have some value just because of the metal. The additional Hermes watch faces are just software, and the straps, while beautiful, wear out. I view the current Apple Watch as having the development trajectory of the early iPhones - each generation was much better than the prior. Now, a 6S (two generation old, or three if you could the iPhone X) is still a great phone and does what everything I would need a phone to do. Next year's Apple Watch will be a lot better than this year's, and may look completely different, to boot. (I hope not, though; I have a lot of straps.)
Don't get me wrong - I think a watch is very personal, and having the right look and, frankly, feel is important. You wear it every day. I can see how the Hermes Apple Watch can easily be justified based on the look and the quality of the straps - you can't rationalize it. But if I can't really make use of the Sport strap, then all I'm really getting different is the leather strap, and I can just buy that separately.