High-End Mac Mini Said to Feature Thinner Design With 'Plexiglass' Top, Magnetic Power Port

We have two Weimaraners and MagSafe consistently saves my 2014 MBP several times a week. Of course it works best if it is hanging off the table on the port side. Regarding my iPad/headless MacMini scenario I’m done with the iPad as Ive been using them for years and should I need to get MacOS work done, I’d just take my old MBP.
 
Last edited:
Good point, and hopefully it's *really* strong. But, I guess my main point (in support of the built-in battery idea) is now that these devices are so low power, it would actually be possible to put a small-ish battery in which could power it over small 'accidents' or the more likely brown-outs and such that people w/o UPSs *WILL* experience over the years.

Ironically (to the supposed purpose), I've never had a MagSafe connector save one of my many MBPs over the years. I just loved the way it feels (and functionality) when I plug it in, compared to, say, plugging in a USB-C or other non-MagSafe power connections. And, I'm probably more worried about a port getting broken than the device being pulled off (my son's MBP cord actually got caught by a carpet-cleaning machine recently, and *luckily* only the cord/plug got broken, not the laptop... which did get pulled to the floor... it did destroy a couple $hundred worth of peripherals).

And, I suppose some home/office environments are different, but the likelihood of an iMac getting pulled off a desk by the cord seem pretty darn slim as well.

As to your potential Mini / iPad future, just be sure you're happy with an iPad for your mobile life. I've done that for years, but it isn't all Apple makes it up to be. First, the workflows are often different, and lots of hoops to jump. It isn't any where near as productive unless you do really simplistic computing tasks (web browsing, writing, etc.).

My mobile computing needs have dramatically dropped, so I'm getting away with it. But every time we've taken a trip and I intend on getting some stuff done, I've always failed, mostly due to just not being willing to jump the hoops, putting it off until I get back. (I get other more iPad oriented stuff done, but skip stuff I wanted to get done.)
I've read a couple of reviews of the new iMacs and in both they say the strength of the MagSafe connection is similar to the friction connection of standard plugs (IEC 60320).
 
I've read a couple of reviews of the new iMacs and in both they say the strength of the MagSafe connection is similar to the friction connection of standard plugs (IEC 60320).
I wonder why they went with it, then? Just a current fascination with magnets?
 
I wonder why they went with it, then? Just a current fascination with magnets?
Current? Apple has been doing magnetic plugs since 2006.

But in this case the iMac's magnets keep it securely plugged in because the new case is too thin for a traditional plug to resist being unplugged accidentally.
 
Last edited:
Current? Apple has been doing magnetic plugs since 2006.

But in this case the iMac's magnets keep it securely plugged in because the new case is too thin for a traditional plug to resist being unplugged accidentally.
I don't understand why everyone seems to think they're an expert on their made up function of the damn iMac power cable.

It is NOT MagSafe, if you pull on the cord it will likely pull the iMac off your desk.

It is not there because a non-magnetic plug wouldn't be strong enough. There's plenty of tiny non-magnetic plugs that don't fall out of their socket.

It's there because Apple had to use a unique cable anyway, and they might as well add the Apple touch where it helps plug itself in.
 
I don't understand why everyone seems to think they're an expert on their made up function of the damn iMac power cable.

It is NOT MagSafe, if you pull on the cord it will likely pull the iMac off your desk.

It is not there because a non-magnetic plug wouldn't be strong enough. There's plenty of tiny non-magnetic plugs that don't fall out of their socket.

It's there because Apple had to use a unique cable anyway, and they might as well add the Apple touch where it helps plug itself in.
You'll notice that I called the iMac or Mini's plugs "magnetic' not 'MagSafe'. As a power supply expert, which of these non-magnetic cables that can also deliver 140W of power and data do you think Apple should have used?
 
You'll notice that I called the iMac or Mini's plugs "magnetic' not 'MagSafe'. As a power supply expert, which of these non-magnetic cables that can also deliver 140W of power and data do you think Apple should have used?
I addressed your claim underneath that. Assuming it's MagSafe is something others have done but it's not what you said.
 
I addressed your claim underneath that. Assuming it's MagSafe is something others have done but it's not what you said.
So where is this big list of plugs you referenced, with cables that can transmit 140W of power and Gigabit Ethernet, that Apple should have used instead of their magnetic solution?

Apple has a history of designing their own power-plugs and connectors, not sure why you're taking issue with it now.
 
So where is this big list of plugs you referenced, with cables that can transmit 140W of power and Gigabit Ethernet, that Apple should have used instead of their magnetic solution?

Apple has a history of designing their own power-plugs and connectors, not sure why you're taking issue with it now.
Can you read?
 
Can you provide examples to back up your argument that Apple's magnetic plug wasn't necessary?
Off the top of my head I can think of about 10 various off-the-shelf plug types have enough pins to have worked for ethernet and power delivery and are shallow enough to fit in the chassis. The humble serial port being one such example.

However, none are particularly attractive or as easy to use as the Magnetic connector as they would require correct orientation, clips, screws or friction to hold them in place.

I have to agree with bwillwall ... Apple did it, because Apple were able to design something far more elegant and practical from a users point of view than was currently available, not due to technical limitations of existing plug types.

I doubt they went though all that effort for just the iMac 24.
 
I still think, that an external power supply is not the best solution and having the ethernet port in the power supply even makes it worse. It clutters my desk fare more than the „old“ solution, I do not want an power supply laying on my floor and I can not store it in the cable rail below my desk because of the heat, if it would fit in the first place.
 
So, we have here 4 USB-C ports, of which only 2 can be used at the same time, given the thickness of the plugs of any peripherals worth talking about. Also, soldered RAM and SSD.
It's a rendering based on a rumor. You're not looking at the finished product ffs.
 
I don't think MagSafe will work well with Mac mini. Considering many of these will be used in server farms, there would be no benefit but catastrophes if someone were to tug the cable a little too hard...
The Mini should have an internal UPS (aka the battery that’s in the MacBook Pro with the same chip).
And it should have a wireless connection to screen and keyboard.
 
It's tried and tested so why not keep same size, internal power supply, a faster chip and more input/output ports such as fast ethernet and a power out to connect to extender storage box like the one from OWC.
 
These renders are trash; the original had a single vent on the bottom, is it intake or exhaust, who knows...?

The more recent animation has removed the vent from the render, so absolutely no venting whatsoever...!?!

And I really hope Apple sticks with the internal PSU, way cleaner than an external brick...

I could see a Mac mini Pro with the current footprint, but twice the height; more room for a larger heat sink & better fan(s), maybe even enough thermal headroom to allow dual SoCs...?!?
 
If they have the same power brick as for the iMac, then the ethernet port is going to be in the brick. Even the macbook pro's could have an ethernet connection in the power brick, that would be great.
 
If they have the same power brick as for the iMac, then the ethernet port is going to be in the brick. Even the macbook pro's could have an ethernet connection in the power brick, that would be great.
The 24” iMacs do not support 10GigE Ethernet. It’s not even available as an option. The MacBook Pros do not have Ethernet at all. You need a dongle for that.

I’m thinking the M1 Pro/Max Mac mini will have a 10GigE option, and would have a different power brick from the 24” iMac. It would also have a different power brick from the bigger iMac, due to different power needs in the Mac mini (no screen, etc).
 
If they have the same power brick as for the iMac, then the ethernet port is going to be in the brick. Even the macbook pro's could have an ethernet connection in the power brick, that would be great.
I absolutely agree: An ethernet port in the power brick of a MacBook Pro is a must. It would also be an intelligent solution for MacMini (or at least in certain power bricks either made by Apple or by Apple certified third parties). Nevertheless, I do not see the point of making the Mac mini thiner: if you must carry it with a brick, the actual MacMini is actually portable enough to put both things in a 14" laptop briefcase without the need of making it thinner. Besides, an extra space for a secondary retrievable hard drive inside the machine will be more appreciated than making the machine thinner.
 
The 24” iMacs do not support 10GigE Ethernet. It’s not even available as an option. The MacBook Pros do not have Ethernet at all. You need a dongle for that.

I’m thinkmag Safe is ing the M1 Pro/Max Mac mini will have a 10GigE option, and would have a different power brick from the 24” iMac. It would also have a different power brick from the bigger iMac, due to different power needs in the Mac mini (no screen, etc).
The magnets on the iMac and let's assume Mac Mini's plug are really strong so using it for data makes sense. By comparison the MBP's MAgSafe is easily detached so running data through it wouldn't make sense.
 
I absolutely agree: An ethernet port in the power brick of a MacBook Pro is a must. It would also be an intelligent solution for MacMini (or at least in certain power bricks either made by Apple or by Apple certified third parties). Nevertheless, I do not see the point of making the Mac mini thiner: if you must carry it with a brick, the actual MacMini is actually portable enough to put both things in a 14" laptop briefcase without the need of making it thinner. Besides, an extra space for a secondary retrievable hard drive inside the machine will be more appreciated than making the machine thinner.
If you bring your Mini with you to work regularly, instead of a laptop, then you probably have a second plug kept at the office so the Mini is even easier to put in a bag.
 
The magnets on the iMac and let's assume Mac Mini's plug are really strong so using it for data makes sense. By comparison the MBP's MAgSafe is easily detached so running data through it wouldn't make sense.
Good point. I did not have this in mind. You are right. But then again, why would you want a magnetic plug on a stationary computer like the iMac or the MacMini? In which circumstances do you believe it is useful?

Considering your other post sent to me, the answer is: yes, whatever machine I purchase, its price increases with a secondary plug. This is why to me it is fine to have the AC /DC plug inside the MacMini. Therefore, if I have to consider the fact that (unfortunately) I will end up purchasing a secondary (most probably proprietary) AC/DC plug, I'd rather Apple to compensate me this extra need with an extra advantage such as the possibility of being able to install by myself a secondary hard drive. But Making the Mac Mini thinner is not really a compensation. My point is, Mac Mini is thin enough; if Apple makes a "Pro" version, it should give us a bit of versatility rather than thinness.

And last but not least, with the new Silicon processors, Apple has a great opportunity to make compact and portable $4000 desktop computers where the client's money goes to the core of the matter: a state of the art software-hardware computational ecosystem and not a screen which the professional shall be free to choose depending on her/his needs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top