Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yup no restocking fee.

Hopefully I will be as lucky as you.

I'm about to go to the Apple store to exchange my 15" 2.53 for a base 17". I can't justify spending more money on the i7 15" hi-res. Plus I don't have an external display in case I want a bigger screen and my computer rarely leaves the house so size shouldn't be an issue...

Wish me luck!

SUCCESS!! No restocking fee. Got the base 17". Shoulda been a no brainer to begin with for the small price difference. Buyers remorse - gone :)
 
Hopefully I will be as lucky as you.

I'm about to go to the Apple store to exchange my 15" 2.53 for a base 17". I can't justify spending more money on the i7 15" hi-res. Plus I don't have an external display in case I want a bigger screen and my computer rarely leaves the house so size shouldn't be an issue...

Wish me luck!

Good luck, just be honest with them. Ask them to waive the restocking fee for you since you are buying a more expensive machine.

Post back your result!
 
I exchanged my mid-2009 anti-glare for the new high-res antiglare. Text is smaller, but not uncomfortable. And the amount of stuff that fits on screen... amazing!

Interestingly, the Apple Store where I did my exchange still had the 15" C2D antiglare on display! Luckily they did stock the new model, but this could potentially lead to confused customers (and confused personnel - when I called them beforehand I got one employee who thought the standard-res still came with antiglare option)
 
Some people are also wearing glasses that make things smaller so they can see things in the distance.

So you're saying they're blind as a bat ? Gotcha. Glad we agree.

Heck, look at how many people switched from "Way too small" to "Must buy!" after some guy posted the screenshots...
 
For some reason last year's (the last version) 17" rez made the text a bit too small for me. Yesterday at the Apple store looking at the 17 rez and the 17 with anti-glare, I found the text size to be fine. The rez is the same with the only difference is LED back-lit? And that made the difference? Or perhaps my vision is different.

Anyway, the store didn't have 15 high resolutions nor 15 with anti-glare available, so I couldn't check them out.
 
For people asking:

Does the anti-glare still have the aluminum bezel?
What does that resolution look like on a 15"?

This video was posted on Youtube yesterday, and now...me want...me very very want...
 
More 1440x900 vs 1680x1050 comparisons

Web Browsing (Equal size windows)
hs7tro.png


Side by Side Productivity
b494sm.png


Clearly there is much more space.

Thank you very much, this is very helpful. However, my primary concern is how the text looks at 1680x1050 vs. 1440x900. Could you please post a screen grab (original size) of the Yahoo's homepage plus any news story to see how how readable the text is? This would be extremely helpful.

P.S. I went to two Best Buys and three Apple stores in the Bay Area and none of them have the 15 inch with the high resolution display.
 
Thank you very much, this is very helpful. However, my primary concern is how the text looks at 1680x1050 vs. 1440x900. Could you please post a screen grab (original size) of the Yahoo's homepage plus any news story to see how how readable the text is? This would be extremely helpful.

P.S. I went to two Best Buys and three Apple stores in the Bay Area and none of them have the 15 inch with the high resolution display.

Maybe this helps: https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/9692217/
 
Hopefully I will be as lucky as you.

I'm about to go to the Apple store to exchange my 15" 2.53 for a base 17". I can't justify spending more money on the i7 15" hi-res. Plus I don't have an external display in case I want a bigger screen and my computer rarely leaves the house so size shouldn't be an issue...

Wish me luck!

SUCCESS!! No restocking fee. Got the base 17". Shoulda been a no brainer to begin with for the small price difference. Buyers remorse - gone :)

How long did you hold me 2.53GHz for? I guess they won't waive the restock fee if you hold it for too long (like 1 week or so)...
 
Am i reading this right that the apple stores are actually now stocking the other monitor types? I got the 15" icore7.... went from a matte screen - its a bit reflective..... thinking about matte.

Tell me more please :) Those who didnt pay a restock fee, please tell us how you got around that. Would love to know.
 
Am i reading this right that the apple stores are actually now stocking the other monitor types? I got the 15" icore7.... went from a matte screen - its a bit reflective..... thinking about matte.

Tell me more please :) Those who didnt pay a restock fee, please tell us how you got around that. Would love to know.

I just went to the store and said that I got mine on launch day and the hi-res displays weren't available and that I wasn't happy the the standard display and wanted to upgrade.

The sales person initially came back and informed me of the 10% restocking fee. I immediately asked to speak to a manager. She came over and I told her my story and without hesitation she said, no problem we can waive it since you are upgrading.

Really was a lot easier than I expected.
 
high res vs. low res; glare vs. anti-glare

OK, here goes. I spent an hour plus at the Apple Store in Albuquerque yesterday, which has all versions of the new Macbook Pros. Like many in this forum, I went in very up in the air on the high resolution upgrade, because at age 42 my eyes are not as good as they used to be and I was worried about the smaller text/icons/menus. Also, I've grown used to the glossy screen in my current Macbook Pro, but I think I preferred the matte screen on my prior Macbook Pro. After working with all versions, there are CLEAR winners (although this is always subjective, I was surprised at the obviousness of the result to me).

First, the high-res upgrade is significantly better in all respects. Yes, the icons/menus/font are a bit smaller -- but the clarity and precision of the images is notably improved which makes up for it. Better yet, there is an easy fix (without going into computer or application preferences/fonts) to making a web page easier to read -- Control Plus takes the whole page and bumps it up to almost identical size of the low-res computer. There is no blurriness (such as when you adjust the resolution of a given monitor to something other than its non-native res). Sure, the menus/icons remain small, but who spends a ton of time reading menus? The added screen space is an advantageous trade-off to slightly smaller icons/menus. More tellingly, after working with the high-res I returned to the low res and was completely frustrated with its image quality, and the absence of screen real estate. Here, the high-res is a clear choice. It should be standard, or simply a choice, in such a high-end laptop.

Next, the glossy vs. matte choice was similarly obvious to me. I can't believe I ever got used to the glossy screen of my current MacBook Pro. Sure, the single glass pane/black edge is prettier when the computer is turned off! But when using it, only in a dimly lit room are my eyes not constantly having to work to view the screen as opposed to what is reflected off it. Sure, if you want to watch DVD's in the dark, snag the glossy. But for ANYTHING else, the matte rules. Pics, text, web.... I'd venture to say its even better for gaming because of the absence of extraneous light from around the room (you can forget about taking the glossy outside). Colors on the matte are pure, not enhanced -- but its not like you can't see them. The matte screen was gorgeous, and the silver bezel (yes, its not black) actually grew on me in a vintage/Macbook kinda way. It matches the unibody design, and is put together well (less likely to collect crumbs and dirt than the prior generation Macbook Pros which were all matte). So, I'm buying a matte screen Macbook Pro.

The ONLY issue remaining for me is 17 vs. 15 -- the extra screen real estate (particularly with the high res -- which you have to get on the 17) was sweeeet! The weight is about the same, at least in feel. The keyboard on the 17 is a little further up the base of the computer (of course), which was frustrating but I guess I would get used to it. I'll probably go 15, but as a true desktop replacement the 17 is absolutely incredible.

Hope that helps --
 
OK, here goes. I spent an hour plus at the Apple Store in Albuquerque yesterday, which has all versions of the new Macbook Pros. Like many in this forum, I went in very up in the air on the high resolution upgrade, because at age 42 my eyes are not as good as they used to be and I was worried about the smaller text/icons/menus. Also, I've grown used to the glossy screen in my current Macbook Pro, but I think I preferred the matte screen on my prior Macbook Pro. After working with all versions, there are CLEAR winners (although this is always subjective, I was surprised at the obviousness of the result to me).

First, the high-res upgrade is significantly better in all respects. Yes, the icons/menus/font are a bit smaller -- but the clarity and precision of the images is notably improved which makes up for it. Better yet, there is an easy fix (without going into computer or application preferences/fonts) to making a web page easier to read -- Control Plus takes the whole page and bumps it up to almost identical size of the low-res computer. There is no blurriness (such as when you adjust the resolution of a given monitor to something other than its non-native res). Sure, the menus/icons remain small, but who spends a ton of time reading menus? The added screen space is an advantageous trade-off to slightly smaller icons/menus. More tellingly, after working with the high-res I returned to the low res and was completely frustrated with its image quality, and the absence of screen real estate. Here, the high-res is a clear choice. It should be standard, or simply a choice, in such a high-end laptop.

Next, the glossy vs. matte choice was similarly obvious to me. I can't believe I ever got used to the glossy screen of my current MacBook Pro. Sure, the single glass pane/black edge is prettier when the computer is turned off! But when using it, only in a dimly lit room are my eyes not constantly having to work to view the screen as opposed to what is reflected off it. Sure, if you want to watch DVD's in the dark, snag the glossy. But for ANYTHING else, the matte rules. Pics, text, web.... I'd venture to say its even better for gaming because of the absence of extraneous light from around the room (you can forget about taking the glossy outside). Colors on the matte are pure, not enhanced -- but its not like you can't see them. The matte screen was gorgeous, and the silver bezel (yes, its not black) actually grew on me in a vintage/Macbook kinda way. It matches the unibody design, and is put together well (less likely to collect crumbs and dirt than the prior generation Macbook Pros which were all matte). So, I'm buying a matte screen Macbook Pro.

The ONLY issue remaining for me is 17 vs. 15 -- the extra screen real estate (particularly with the high res -- which you have to get on the 17) was sweeeet! The weight is about the same, at least in feel. The keyboard on the 17 is a little further up the base of the computer (of course), which was frustrating but I guess I would get used to it. I'll probably go 15, but as a true desktop replacement the 17 is absolutely incredible.

Hope that helps --

One thing I would add to this is that without the extra weight of the glass the top stays where you put it. The matte screen version won't fall closed as you move your MBP. You can lay down and hold the computer at an angle without having to deal with the top wanting to close.
 
OK, here goes. I spent an hour plus at the Apple Store in Albuquerque yesterday, which has all versions of the new Macbook Pros. Like many in this forum, I went in very up in the air on the high resolution upgrade, because at age 42 my eyes are not as good as they used to be and I was worried about the smaller text/icons/menus. Also, I've grown used to the glossy screen in my current Macbook Pro, but I think I preferred the matte screen on my prior Macbook Pro. After working with all versions, there are CLEAR winners (although this is always subjective, I was surprised at the obviousness of the result to me).

First, the high-res upgrade is significantly better in all respects. Yes, the icons/menus/font are a bit smaller -- but the clarity and precision of the images is notably improved which makes up for it. Better yet, there is an easy fix (without going into computer or application preferences/fonts) to making a web page easier to read -- Control Plus takes the whole page and bumps it up to almost identical size of the low-res computer. There is no blurriness (such as when you adjust the resolution of a given monitor to something other than its non-native res). Sure, the menus/icons remain small, but who spends a ton of time reading menus? The added screen space is an advantageous trade-off to slightly smaller icons/menus. More tellingly, after working with the high-res I returned to the low res and was completely frustrated with its image quality, and the absence of screen real estate. Here, the high-res is a clear choice. It should be standard, or simply a choice, in such a high-end laptop.

Next, the glossy vs. matte choice was similarly obvious to me. I can't believe I ever got used to the glossy screen of my current MacBook Pro. Sure, the single glass pane/black edge is prettier when the computer is turned off! But when using it, only in a dimly lit room are my eyes not constantly having to work to view the screen as opposed to what is reflected off it. Sure, if you want to watch DVD's in the dark, snag the glossy. But for ANYTHING else, the matte rules. Pics, text, web.... I'd venture to say its even better for gaming because of the absence of extraneous light from around the room (you can forget about taking the glossy outside). Colors on the matte are pure, not enhanced -- but its not like you can't see them. The matte screen was gorgeous, and the silver bezel (yes, its not black) actually grew on me in a vintage/Macbook kinda way. It matches the unibody design, and is put together well (less likely to collect crumbs and dirt than the prior generation Macbook Pros which were all matte). So, I'm buying a matte screen Macbook Pro.

The ONLY issue remaining for me is 17 vs. 15 -- the extra screen real estate (particularly with the high res -- which you have to get on the 17) was sweeeet! The weight is about the same, at least in feel. The keyboard on the 17 is a little further up the base of the computer (of course), which was frustrating but I guess I would get used to it. I'll probably go 15, but as a true desktop replacement the 17 is absolutely incredible.

Hope that helps --

What is Control Plus
 
I've called a couple of stores here in Houston, TX - they act like I am crazy thinking that they have stock of the high res monitors / matte options. They have told me that Apple isnt shipping them those and that its a BTO.

Where do you all live/ how are you finding them? LOL

Think I should call 800-apple and see if i can swap over the phone?
 
I've called a couple of stores here in Houston, TX - they act like I am crazy thinking that they have stock of the high res monitors / matte options. They have told me that Apple isnt shipping them those and that its a BTO.

Where do you all live/ how are you finding them? LOL

Think I should call 800-apple and see if i can swap over the phone?

Cincinnati, OH for me (Kenwood Towne Center). Someone I work with bought a 15" i7, Hi-Res Matte earlier in the day on Friday. I wanted the exact same thing and called before I drove up there and was told "we have plenty of them." I very briefly contemplated a hi-res glossy while I was in the store and they indicated that it would have been a problem to walk out with one either way.
 
Finally an option to get rid of the fisher price resolution on the 15"

I wouldn't say that the 1440x900 is fisher price. 99.99999999999999% of laptops I see at work and at school (I do systems repair work for a University as well as am a student there) are 15" PCs with 1280x800 screens. It is incredibly rare for us to run across a non Mac that is 15" and higher than 1280x800. Very very very very rare. I have seen maybe 2 15" class PCs with higher resolutions in the last 4 years, and I have serviced a crapload of laptops.
 
99.99999999999999% of laptops I see at work and at school are 15" PCs with 1280x800 screens.

Isn't it sad how manufacturers get away with praying on morons? "Oh it's a bigger screen, that means more space!" Sorry to break it to you, but you're just getting a stretched fuzzy display.

And that's why Windows owns the market :D
 
Isn't it sad how manufacturers get away with praying on morons? "Oh it's a bigger screen, that means more space!" Sorry to break it to you, but you're just getting a stretched fuzzy display.

And that's why Windows owns the market :D

I never said it looked good, because I don't think 1280x800 is good on a 15" at all. I was pointing out to the people who think 1440x900 on a 15" display is bad that most Windows laptops are running 1280x800 on a 15" screen, so 1440x900 is actually good compared to that.

Needless to say, I prefer my 17" 1920x1200 :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.