First, the high-res upgrade is significantly better in all respects. Yes, the icons/menus/font are a bit smaller -- but the clarity and precision of the images is notably improved which makes up for it.
I put two 15-inch MBPs side-by-side (the high resolution/antiglare and standard) at the store today: In my opinion, the images look pretty close. On the antiglare screen, the colors seem to be a bit less saturated, but without a third and properly calibrated screen with a reference image, there is no way to tell which screen displays colors more accurately.
Better yet, there is an easy fix (without going into computer or application preferences/fonts) to making a web page easier to read -- Control Plus takes the whole page and bumps it up to almost identical size of the low-res computer. There is no blurriness (such as when you adjust the resolution of a given monitor to something other than its non-native res). Sure, the menus/icons remain small, but who spends a ton of time reading menus?
I agree. By the way, the fastest way to zoom in or out (increase/decrease the size of text) is to use the "pinch" gesture on the trackpad. It is true, the zoomed in text looks good, but it defeats the purpose of a high resolution screen (at least when browsing), because if you zoom in, you lose the screen real estate.
On the standard resolution, text looks already rather small. On the high resolution screen text looks even smaller, but not by much (maybe half a point). Still, since the text on the standard resolution is already relatively small, on the high resolution screen you end up with what I would describe as a very small text. However, text on the high resolution screen looks slightly better (it seems to be sharper).
Next, the glossy vs. matte choice was similarly obvious to me. I can't believe I ever got used to the glossy screen of my current MacBook Pro. Sure, the single glass pane/black edge is prettier when the computer is turned off!
I think it looks better either way, on or off.
But when using it, only in a dimly lit room are my eyes not constantly having to work to view the screen as opposed to what is reflected off it. Sure, if you want to watch DVD's in the dark, snag the glossy. But for ANYTHING else, the matte rules. Pics, text, web.
There is no question that when it comes to reflections, the matte screen rules. It simply does not have any reflections.
The matte screen was gorgeous, and the silver bezel (yes, its not black) actually grew on me in a vintage/Macbook kinda way. It matches the unibody design, and is put together well (less likely to collect crumbs and dirt than the prior generation Macbook Pros which were all matte).
Yes, it sort of grows on you. Sort of. From the design point of view, it looks out of place and as if it was an afterthought, but my main concern is not how it looks, it is the fact that while it seems to be well put together, there is some space between it and the actual LCD display. I am afraid that with time, that space will collect dust and other stuff, which will be hard to clean. The glossy screen is completely sealed. Finally, compared to the glossy screen, because the matte screen is a "naked" LCD display, it does not seem to be as well protected as the glossy screen, and not as easy to clean.
For those who want to know how much additional real estate you get with the high resolution screen, assuming you move the title bar to the side and maximize the browser on the standard resolution screen, the high resolution screen gives you about two extra lines when looking at the Yahoo's home page.