Good point, but your matched music is at a lower quality than my cd ripped music.
Plus, why do I have to pay to listen to music I already own?
I don't need Apple Music nor do I want yet another monthly fee.
Lots of matched music is actually created from 192 KHz / 24 bit samples. It _can_ be as good as CD quality. It is definitely better than any lossy rip from CDs.
[doublepost=1533324899][/doublepost]
Where do you pay $120 for lower quality music? And really, if Apple manages to build a $350 speaker where you can hear the difference between 256 Kbit AAC and CDs, then this speaker is a bargain.You’d think buying a handful of $350 units would be enough for convenience surcharge but I guess not, it costs an extra $120 year for lower quality music.
[doublepost=1533325100][/doublepost]
Mastered for iTunes is still lossy is it not?
I already own a ton of music, not interested in paying for it again.
Lossy from 192 KBit/s / 24 bit masters. Your CD is lossy as well by throwing away lots of data.
[doublepost=1533325353][/doublepost]
Seems you are not familiar with the difference that the master makes. Now seriously, if you think that LPs sound better than CDs then you are imagining things. "Made for iTunes" and CDs start with the same masters. CDs just throw away 85 percent of the data, while AAC compression does its best to throw away data without reducing what you hear in quality.Sounds like you're not familiar with lossless vs lossy compression and it's effect on music quality.
In short, most recorded music quality keeps dropping (lp>cd>mp3) and most people just say ok fine.