Hey Siri, it's bedtime. And it does all that.
I shouldn't have to set up a scene just because I want to use a conjunction.
Hey Siri, it's bedtime. And it does all that.
It’s a bit more complicated than that. Amazon and google have a higher market share but most of their devices are sold for peanuts or given away for free. How much money are they actually making off of those devices.Market share is becoming increasingly relevant now that they are trying to be a services company
It would be an easy thing: If i look at the feature list and compare it with my old Sonos speakers, I would get these "cheap" Sonos again.
Homepod lacks two major things:
- Play MY local music WITHOUT a supplementary 1000$ streaming device (aka iPhone)
- Play more than the Apple-approved 3 radiostations just by itself.
We would be immediately in the game then, but as-is at THAT price. No thanks...
The google max is supposed to be comparable to the HomePod but loudness isn’t what I covert n a speaker so it’s not what I’d consider. I prefer a more balanced set up.In my opinion, the HomePod has the best hardware of any other device out there.
But both Amazon’s Echo and Google’s device seem to have more advanced and flexible software.
It seems more like you didn't understand the purpose of the article. I'm pretty sure the author gets that this is a simple market share comparison. I'd be willing to bet they have more detailed and stratified analysis behind their paywall. Question is, are you eager enough to see it by paying for it? This article has nothing to do with speaker sound. To criticize it on that basis is silly and misses the point entirely.Another misbegotten article by someone who just doesn't get it. The HomePod competes with the Google Home Max ($399) (and some SONOS, BOSE, and others), Amazon only sells crappy speakers, so no comparison there. Maybe the author wants a $349 super sounding speaker to compete with a $25 POS speaker, but no, never going to happen.
Apple, for whatever reason, has not really entered this market, so no wonder it has little market share.
Everything this person just said is an all out lie. It doesn’t add bass to audiobooks. You may need to get your hearing checked. Also the HomePod responds to the same exact Hue commands that Alexa does as I just checked. Last the alarm via Siri and HomePod works flawlessly. My God..this person just wants to complain and lie.I ended up returning the homepod I own and getting more amazon alexa's. My problems with it is several:
1) Sound Quality - I play audiobooks and other media outside of music on the homepod. The homepod puts too much bass into the sound of anything I play into it. I have no controls to make it sound ok.
2) Philips Hue commands - Homepod doesn't recognize the commands in the same way as Alexa does. So when I ask Alexa to turn on the lights it turns on all the lights. When I ask homepod to turn on the lights it turns on one light. I don't have any apparent controls over that.
3) Alarms - Siri doesn't handle alarms very well. I will wake up to an alarm and ask for the alarm to be snoozed and siri gets confused and speaks very loudly about snoozing the alarm. When I use alexa, the snooze functionality works appropriately and is easy to use.
Generally the Homepod is a failure to me. I guess it's the general lack of specific controls over the homepod. The basic settings are not done well (which is not my usual experience with Apple). Maybe I'll revisit the homepod on version 2.
The HomePod isn’t expensive by any means.It sounds good, but It's expensive. There are more expensive speakers that *actually* interface with all devices.
If you're going to buy a good speaker, why would you limit yourself to something that only does AirPlay? What about USB, Toslink, and Ethernet or 3.5mm inputs?
I ended up moving my single HomePod in the kitchen, and buying Kef LSX's for the living room.
The HomePod isn’t expensive by any means.
Literally anything that comes to mind when I don't have a device in had. I asked Alexa what the budget for There Will Be Blood was, it answered it. I asked Siri and it gave me some links to the the movie. Siri is a generation behind Alexa. The game is over for Apple in this regard. Siri will never be comparable to Alexa, ever.I own both HomePods and Echo dots and don't have an issue with either one really. What requests are you routinely asking Alexa to perform that Siri cannot? I do think the Echo devices have some advantages, but as far as personal assistants go I find them to be extremely comparable.
It’s not a fair comparison because most of the speakers Google and Amazon are selling are for £25 or given away for free. The HomePod costs a lot more so it’s not going to move as many units.It seems more like you didn't understand the purpose of the article. I'm pretty sure the author gets that this is a simple market share comparison. I'd be willing to bet they have more detailed and stratified analysis behind their paywall. Question is, are you eager enough to see it by paying for it? This article has nothing to do with speaker sound. To criticize it on that basis is silly and misses the point entirely.
I agree. It all comes down how much people want to spend on a speaker. People spent hundreds and thousands of pounds on speaker systems long before smart speakers existed.I would agree with that and add that it's not that the HomePod is expensive, it's that its competitors are cheap.
1) Sound Quality - I play audiobooks and other media outside of music on the homepod. The homepod puts too much bass into the sound of anything I play into it. I have no controls to make it sound ok.
2) Philips Hue commands - Homepod doesn't recognize the commands in the same way as Alexa does. So when I ask Alexa to turn on the lights it turns on all the lights. When I ask homepod to turn on the lights it turns on one light. I don't have any apparent controls over that.
3) Alarms - Siri doesn't handle alarms very well. I will wake up to an alarm and ask for the alarm to be snoozed and siri gets confused and speaks very loudly about snoozing the alarm. When I use alexa, the snooze functionality works appropriately and is easy to use.
...
Fair to whom? A bunch of randoms on an internet forum. It's a market share report. What do you think is supposed to be fair about a market share report? Not being mean, but seriously? It's dry numbers.It’s not a fair comparison because most of the speakers Google and Amazon are selling are for £25 or given away for free. The HomePod costs a lot more so it’s not going to move as many units.
[doublepost=1550600082][/doublepost]
I agree. It all comes down how much people want to spend on a speaker. People spent hundreds and thousands of pounds on speaker systems long before smart speakers existed.
Well it’s a soundbite and it’s not giving the whole picture.Fair to whom? A bunch of randoms on an internet forum. It's a market share report. What do you think is supposed to be fair about a market share report.
Well no Echo speakers have 7 tweeters and 7 mics working in tandem to analyze your surrounding and sounding good while doing it.
Say what you want about Siri on HomePod, it is pale in comparison with Alexa or Google. But HomePod is one of the best sounding speaker for that size. If you look at it as a whole package, nothing compares. The competition is either sounds great but dumb (no built in assistant), or really smart but sucks at playing music.
The only one comes close is Home Max but I don't think it's a popular product. Especially at $399.
It’s a bit more complicated than that. Amazon and google have a higher market share but most of their devices are sold for peanuts or given away for free. How much money are they actually making off of those devices.
People just like to complain.Sounds like some of the issues lie with the ability of the users.![]()
More complaining.I shouldn't have to set up a scene just because I want to use a conjunction.
Sell a pair of HomePods for $399 and I would bite.
Pay for more detailed info if that's what you're wanting. They have it.Well it’s a soundbite and it’s not giving the whole picture.