Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
LOL. You should email Tim Cook. Clearly, you've thought this out. WAY more than they have.

Regardless TouchID is a superior method. It's fast (especially on the 7/7 plus and MacBook Pro) and convenient. On the iPhone 6 it was too sensitive to oil and sweat. It would give me a hard time working indoors. With the 7 there are no longer any problems. It's really a shame they can't incorporate it under the glass. That would be extremely impressive. I hope they don't give up on it. Going from touchID to "faceID" to go back to touchID under the screen would be ridiculous.
 
To be fair they have to release something with an edge-to-edge OLED screen or they're going to look old-fashioned next to the competition; people really are that guidable and finicky and will buy on looks alone.
Totally agree, been waiting for an edge-to-edge screen since the iPhone 6, but to do it now and to get rid of TouchID just feels like they waited until the last possible moment and are now scrambling.

Like I said, I think Apple had great plans for this phone, but dragged their feet and are now out of time.
 
For those who say you can use apple pay with passcode, surely that defeats the point of contactless payment. I'd end up with a better user experience from the plastic bank card in my wallet that costs pennies to make and I get for free.

I honestly think that Touch ID will be there in some form come September.

Finally the rumour mill is heating up after months of bezel and top notch talk! It's starting to feel like an iPhone launch again!

P.s. Has the UK preorder thread started? :)

It will be there on the 7s/7s plus. I really hope they don't make a complete mess with their lineup. It's possible that this OLED 8 won't even be released this year. Anything is possible.
 
I think Samsung's left a horrible taste in people’s mouths and therefore it is hard to understand the progression Apple has made with camera and AI technology in the last couple years.

For example: The camera sees depth, not just a flat face. It has a wide range. It doesn't use the visible light spectrum to do its work. Even though these things are confirmed to work in this way, these are things that people have never seen in a facial unlock so it's hard to imagine.

I agree: People forget that Touch ID's implementation was entirely new, so much that the industry couldn't believe it and it took several years for manufacturers to catch up. Not to mention, if Apple is willing to remove TouchID (still one of the best auth sensors out there), this method must have made it redundant.
I still don't see how facial recognition would work with sunglasses. I would wager that a large portion of people wear those anytime they are outside. I sure do.
 
Perhaps integrating it under the display caused more problems than solutions: without a ring, maybe aligning fingers without explicitly looking at the screen was a hassle. Maybe, since it was under the display, fingerprints became an even larger problem. The what-ifs can extend in both directions so asking them without credible answers is pointless. It seems as though Apple found a solution that they are willing to be big on.

You say you expected a full redesign for 8 and that is what you are getting. Something that is redrawn and outside the box. You can't ask for those things then throw a tantrum when the small preview you get doesn't match what existed before.
You're correct, but the only reason Apple would have to get rid of TouchID is that they couldn't crack the tech. There is literally NO other reason, the tech exists Vivo proved it. What upsets me the most is they had so much time to do this, having had the 6 design for an extra year. Maybe I had higher expectations than I should have, but when you take extra time like that I expect something revolutionary, not something that feels rushed to market.

I don't think there's a single person here that doesn't believe the iPhone 8 doesn't have TouchID under the display, the 8S will. I find it pointless to remove it, only to reintroduce it.
[doublepost=1501628186][/doublepost]
That's the difference between Steve's Apple and Timmy's Apple.

Steve's Apple was capable of truly amazing, world-changing things. Timmy's Apple, not so much.
Haha totally agree. Tim's a good businessman, great for stock prices, but lacks the passion/revolutionary vision Steve had.
[doublepost=1501629235][/doublepost]
Windows Hello recognizes me in all stages of shaved/unshaved. I've had long hair/short hair. Sometimes I wear my RX glasses for close distances, often I do not. I'll often wear a beanie hat as well. Yes, it works in absolute pitch black too. IR doesn't use visible light to work.

It has also been shown to tell the difference between identical twins with perfect accuracy.

Every time you sign on it adds info to the profile of your face. So it even learns as you age. Maybe you could trip it up by growing an 8-inch beard, but not if you used the device weekly during the process of growing the beard.

Complaints about accuracy, speed, light needed have already been addressed by Microsoft's implementation, and I don't think I need to convince people on here that Apple should be able to do even better.

The REAL complaint is angle of view/distance. Microsoft's implementation doesn't work outside of the range you'd be using a laptop / when standing above the camera. It's less noticeable on a Surface because you're likely to be within the usable range, but we tend to hold our phones much more casually. This is the area Apple would have to make strides. Much wider angles.
That angle is by far my biggest gripe with using facial recognition over a fingerprint sensor. If you could pick up your phone casually like we do now and it automatically detects your face and unlocks your phone (and is obviously as accurate), than I'm 100% on board, get rid of TouchID. But if it's gonna look like I'm taking a selfie every time I wanna check my email, than hell no. I'd rather have it on the back and smudge my camera lens than look like some narcissistic teenage girl.
 
Why would you need to unlock your phone if you're not looking at it?
Right now on my desk I can unlock my iPhone with my index finger. I then select my next song or Spotify station at a glance while staying in front of my keyboard. With the facial unlock I'll have to hover my face directly over the camera everytime I want to unlock the iPhone. I really doubt the facial or retinal recognition will work unless your face is centered over the front of the iPhone 8. That's a major inconvenience
 
  • Like
Reactions: pratikindia
I just don't buy the story of ditching the touch id entirely. It would be a really bad move. There's something missing here.
 
If no TouchID, it will be curious to see how it will take FaceID to complete Apple Pay or other kinds of authentication.
 
It will be there on the 7s/7s plus. I really hope they don't make a complete mess with their lineup. It's possible that this OLED 8 won't even be released this year. Anything is possible.
Don't forget, it'll also be on the 8S! :D
If the 8 isn't released with TouchID under the display, the 8S will. Mark my words. Someone refer to this next August!
 
Don't forget, it'll also be on the 8S! :D
If the 8 isn't released with TouchID under the display, the 8S will. Mark my words. Someone refer to this next August!

I find it unlikely, unless they put touchID in iPhone 8 this year, either on the back or on the power button.
They can't remove touchID in 2017, praise faceID as an alternative and then announce touchID is back in 2018 because they were finally able to embed it under the display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jedifaka
Apparently there are a number of facial recognition features from other companies that have been received very well. I’d have to think that Apple, with their expertise and the companies they purchased and integrated, could put out a more compelling feature. Either way, stomping your feet and saying you won’t buy really doesn’t accomplish a whole lot. Let’s just wait and see what they come up with. Maybe it’s better? The good thing is you will be able to buy your phone with a normal screen and Touch ID for at least a few more years. I have a feeling Apple will deliver though.

I’m talking about my personal purchasing priorities. I can stomp my feet as much as I damn please.

Apple has lots of money, but they’re not above releasing rubbish. Remember Apple Maps? Or the iPad G3 which many people went and paid $1000+ for, only for Apple to obsolete it six months later? Remember how awesome Siri was supposed to be?!

Don’t drink the kool-aid. Apple is not magic. They don’t have facial recognition which is as secure and reliable as TouchID.

Don’t get duped by the marketing. Wait and you’ll soon see people returning them. It’s one of those things which sounds good until you try and integrate it in to your day.
[doublepost=1501670692][/doublepost]
I find it unlikely, unless they put touchID in iPhone 8 this year, either on the back or on the power button.
They can't remove touchID in 2017, praise faceID as an alternative and then announce touchID is back in 2018 because they were finally able to embed it under the display.

You mean like they couldn’t make the tall iPhone 5, claiming it is the perfect size for a smartphone, and then make the iPhone 6 available in two different sizes?

Or like they released the G3 iPad, claiming it was the best device they could build, before showing up 6 months later with another new model with significant internal upgrades?

Apple is a corporation. Don’t imbue them with human traits like honesty. They would screw every last one of us over and not bat an eyelid about it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
You mean like they couldn’t make the tall iPhone 5, claiming it is the perfect size for a smartphone, and then make the iPhone 6 available in two different sizes?

Or like they released the G3 iPad, claiming it was the best device they could build, before showing up 6 months later with another new model with significant internal upgrades?

Apple is a corporation. Don’t imbue them with human traits like honesty. They would screw every last one of us over and not bat an eyelid about it.

It's a different story.
TouchID is about security. If they sell a phone with FaceID only this year and tell you is as secure as TouchID (if they support Apple pay it have to be secure) they can't go back to touchID after only one or two years.
If FaceID is secure and fast why putting TouchID back? Because it is more secure? It would be like admitting they shipped something not secure enough.
And it would be confusing as well. You learn to use touchID, then you have to forget about it and rely on face recognition, then you go back to fingerprint?

I'd like touchID to stay, so they can put it under the display as soon as it is a viable option. But if they ditch it it will be gone for a long time, if not forever
 
It's a different story.
TouchID is about security. If they sell a phone with FaceID only this year and tell you is as secure as TouchID (if they support Apple pay it have to be secure) they can't go back to touchID after only one or two years.
If FaceID is secure and fast why putting TouchID back? Because it is more secure? It would be like admitting they shipped something not secure enough.
And it would be confusing as well. You learn to use touchID, then you have to forget about it and rely on face recognition, then you go back to fingerprint?

I'd like touchID to stay, so they can put it under the display as soon as it is a viable option. But if they ditch it it will be gone for a long time, if not forever
Agree, just like the headphone port, if touchID is removed from the flagship iphone, it's gone forever in other future iphones. The rumored 7S+ seems like it might a decent device if it has Promotion, just as fast CPU/GPU, and hopefully better battery life while retaining TouchID. Apple may just cheap out and only upgrade the CPU/GPU and call it a day though...
 
I find it unlikely, unless they put touchID in iPhone 8 this year, either on the back or on the power button.
They can't remove touchID in 2017, praise faceID as an alternative and then announce touchID is back in 2018 because they were finally able to embed it under the display.
I would agree with you, but I truly believe fingerprint sensors under the display are the way of the future. Facial recognition is promising, but until you can casually open your phone without holding it to your face like you're taking a selfie, fingerprint sensors will be the most convenient verification method. They're just too practical and reliable right now to eliminate completely.

Also, I think Apple always intended to embed TouchID under the screen of the 8, which means they would have devoted a lot of time and money to R&D. I have a hard time believing they would just throw all that away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: juannacho
Regardless TouchID is a superior method. It's fast (especially on the 7/7 plus and MacBook Pro) and convenient. On the iPhone 6 it was too sensitive to oil and sweat. It would give me a hard time working indoors. With the 7 there are no longer any problems. It's really a shame they can't incorporate it under the glass. That would be extremely impressive. I hope they don't give up on it. Going from touchID to "faceID" to go back to touchID under the screen would be ridiculous.
You have no basis for saying it is "superior, regardless".

I think you lack understanding of what the user experience will be like when using Face ID. Spoiler Alert: If it is what I think it is, it will be almost indistinguishable from using Touch ID.
[doublepost=1501699553][/doublepost]
I would agree with you, but I truly believe fingerprint sensors under the display are the way of the future. Facial recognition is promising, but until you can casually open your phone without holding it to your face like you're taking a selfie, fingerprint sensors will be the most convenient verification method. They're just too practical and reliable right now to eliminate completely.

Also, I think Apple always intended to embed TouchID under the screen of the 8, which means they would have devoted a lot of time and money to R&D. I have a hard time believing they would just throw all that away.
Way too many things wrong with this post to even break it apart.

I think Apple has designed iPhone 8 from the start without Touch ID, which has led to confusion over it in the media/supply chain, all of whom are trying to be the one to tell the world what is happening.
 
The iris scanner on the S8 works well, unless you have glasses and are in sunlight. Hopefully whatever Apple did with this phone is superior.

Yes, hopefully! As I, just like MILLIONS of others wear glasses. A friend just got an S8 and we were all checking out the facial unlocking. “Whoah! It’s really fast!” Got him to put my (very normal) glasses on - total fail. No unlock for you!

Dropping TouchID isn’t like when Apple dropped optical drives or Ethernet, dare I say even headphone jack... IF this happens it will be the first time I can think of where Apple are forcing a change that they themselves don’t want simply to hit a launch window...
 
I'm not sure why one would want to be unlocking the phone while in their pocket.. I guess there's going to be some very random use case for that, but I can't imagine it's used much at all.

Still, we don't know what Apple is up to. Just look at how the ARKit stuff on existing hardware (using just cameras) has been blowing people away. For all we know, facial recognition could be faster than touch ID.

This is how the world thinks and the usual response. Sorrry. But I had this feeling Apple was a bit different. Like with all those accessibility features. I actually unlock my phone in the car – without looking – all the time. Speed is super fast, it's reliable, still it could be improved by being able to unlock with wet hands or in the water. But now a new technology arrives and I bet there will be a lot of new and serious problems. Mark my words. Really.
 
If you're visually impaired and use accessibility features instead of looking at the screen all the time... seems to me you'd still need to unlock the phone? :confused:
Yeah, ok, but let's be real. That's a pretty infrequent scenario.
[doublepost=1501712175][/doublepost]
Right now on my desk I can unlock my iPhone with my index finger. I then select my next song or Spotify station at a glance while staying in front of my keyboard. With the facial unlock I'll have to hover my face directly over the camera everytime I want to unlock the iPhone. I really doubt the facial or retinal recognition will work unless your face is centered over the front of the iPhone 8. That's a major inconvenience
I guess we'll see. I would hope that it's sophisticated enough to be able to work in your scenario. If not, I think they will have really blown it getting rid of touchID.
 
Yeah, ok, but let's be real. That's a pretty infrequent scenario.
[doublepost=1501712175][/doublepost]
I guess we'll see. I would hope that it's sophisticated enough to be able to work in your scenario. If not, I think they will have really blown it getting rid of touchID.
You're limited by optics, they're going to have to put a super wide angle lens (while adding thickness and bulk - all blasphemy in Apple's world) on the front facing camera if they want this to work on my scenario.
 
I brought this up before and people seem to be ignoring it in a way. We have heard zero rumors of Apple talking with banks and stores about using "FaceID" as an alternative to TouchID. Surely banks/stores would be in talks with Apple to make sure this technology is secure enough to use as a payment option. Yes, one person mentioned you can still use Apple Pay with your passcode, however, as someone else mentioned that basically ruins Apple Pay by making it super slow. Think how fast TouchID is vs. typing your passcode in...especially when you have a custom numeric passcode like I do that is 14 digits long. I can type my passcode fast but not near as a fast as just touching my finger to a sensor.

If banks and stores drop Apple Pay because they do not trust "FaceID" as a secure payment method, well...Apple truly has fu**ed up! I have to believe TouchID is on this iPhone somewhere. I pray to God it is embedded in the screen OR I would not mind it being in the elongated power button, however, if it is on the back...the iPhone X/8/Pro or whatever it is called will be a huge flop.

It is just my thought, but come on think about it! Apple would have to renegotiate its Apple Pay contracts with the banks and retailers to include "FaceID" as a secure method that the banks and stores will accept!

:apple:
 
I think we’ve all overlooked the fact that Apple could roll out, to those who want it, a physical Touch ID button that connects via the Lightning port, and it will be a $39.99 dongle.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.