Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is a review from a photographer...


This is a comparison with the 12 mini / 12 / 12 Pro...


Basically, there's no night and day noticeable difference between the 12 mini / 12 / 12 Pro and the 12 Pro Max.
Enjoy the phone that best suits your needs, enjoy the camera - they all take great shots for what they are.

But if anyone is going bigger just for the camera, it's not worth it is basically my take from most videos I've watched. I would trust the view of a photographer rather than a "tech reviewer" who will often only have good things to say about Apple so that they keep getting their future review units etc.
 
Yup - I read the TechCrunch review I posted above and there were several compelling reasons, but there was one big standout line for me as a parent who uses his phone a lot to take pictures/videos of my 4 young kids...

"The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a massive ISO range, enabled by the wide angle. It can pick anywhere from 34-7,616 ISO, which allows it to snap candid shots at wide apertures and faster shutter speeds with much more surety than the iPhone 12 Pro. This isn’t a huge deal for some people, and some of the gain can be washed away depending on what you’re shooting. But for people with kids and who shoot moving subjects in less than ideal conditions, it’s big. It can be the difference between a tack sharp shareable and a throwaway in the right situation."

Interesting! I just looked at the shots all the reviewers took, and I wasn’t impressed vs the 12 pro. The 12 pro max over the 11 series is great and over most androids, still awesome. There is just not much of a gap between the 12 pro and 12 pro max. To me these reviewers are trying to justify a second review of the 12 pro max in a lot them. Sure there is an improvement, but honest reviews the gap isn’t there that they thought. All the tech sites thought the new big sensor was going to be a huge advantage for the pro max, but I think they were disappointed. Just in that the gap wasn’t what they thought.
 
The camera improvements for the Pro Max are mainly in low light video (and there it is pretty impressive).

Watch the video from 6:52 (if the timestamp doesn't work). When he shows the night-time video shots between the 12 Pro and the Pro Max the quality improvement is noticeable:

(It's a german reviewer)

But yeah, I wouldn't base the upgrading decision solely on the Pro Max slightly better camera.
 
Last edited:
The camera is better but to me having that huge phone is not worth it. If I were coming from a Max or + phone for sure I would be getting the Max. Best iPhone ever. However, jumping from an X to a Pro Max I feel is too much at this time. I prefer to jump from the X to the Pro (that is already bigger and feel bigger) and then in the future maybe jump to the Max. I am a heavy camera user but mostly are pictures of landscapes and on my trips, so I don't feel the improvements at this time are worth it for me. I am very happy with the Pro camera.

In addition, If I were not using a wallet case maybe I would try the Max this year but I love this type of case, and adding that to the phone it enlarges the size considerably. So Pro Max + Wallet cases = monster phone.
 
Yup - I read the TechCrunch review I posted above and there were several compelling reasons, but there was one big standout line for me as a parent who uses his phone a lot to take pictures/videos of my 4 young kids...

"The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a massive ISO range, enabled by the wide angle. It can pick anywhere from 34-7,616 ISO, which allows it to snap candid shots at wide apertures and faster shutter speeds with much more surety than the iPhone 12 Pro. This isn’t a huge deal for some people, and some of the gain can be washed away depending on what you’re shooting. But for people with kids and who shoot moving subjects in less than ideal conditions, it’s big. It can be the difference between a tack sharp shareable and a throwaway in the right situation."

Just to add, I trust Peter McKinnon when it comes to photography. Just says it clearly, he really can’t tell there is that much difference in the 12 pro and pro max. Again I am taking the words from a photographer over tech sites. He knows what he is talking about.

 
Just to add, I trust Peter McKinnon when it comes to photography. Just says it clearly, he really can’t tell there is that much difference in the 12 pro and pro max. Again I am taking the words from a photographer over tech sites. He knows what he is talking about.


Yep I like him as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bmac4
The difference in video quality (after the golden hour) between the iPhone 12 Pro Max and the iPhone 11 Pro Max is definitely noticable. Check out this youtuber, who focuses on the video capabilities.

 
  • Like
Reactions: vito
i think the max main/wide sensor might have the largest size pixels since the iPhone 6 (to be clear: not largest total sensor size since the iPhone 6).

iPhone 5: 1.25 microns + 8MP
iPhone 5s: 1.5 microns + 8MP
iPhone 6: 1.5 microns + 8MP
iPhone 6S: 1.25 microns + 12MP
* few in-between around 1.25/ 1.28 *
iPhone 12 / 12 Pro: 1.4 microns (same as google pixel again)
iPhone 12 Pro Max: 1.7 microns + 12MP (pretty cool)

The iPhone 6 was able to do this because it was only 8MP so the overall sensor size wasn't huge. Looking back, I still really like some of the photos taken on the iPhone 6 - in perfect conditions, where computational photography does not add much and the amount of pixels is not critical, it can still take great photos to todays standards.

So I was half expecting the 1.7 micron pixels on the 12 Pro Max to absolutely blow me away, like higher details on tree leaves on a grey day / poor lightning etc... so far does not seem to be delivering much except for in the more extreme examples like nighttime, hmmmm

Probably just shows how far image processing has come
 
I'm excited to get mine.

I have giant hands and old eyes, so the size is a non-issue for me.

I'm coming from an XS Max. Last year's night mode stuff pushed me over the edge to upgrade. Then I broke my screen 3 weeks before I could trade it in (no AppleCare). Then I was too cheap to pay for the repair to just turn it in afterwards. I almost just had it fixed a few months back, but I've held in there. So I'm thrilled I'll have an intact screen again. The broken one will be used for development purposes. It got the job done for over a year. It will make a fine backup and beta device.

I find myself snapping a lot of photos indoors under less than ideal lighting conditions. Kids or pets running around and such. The photos look good till they get to my 27" screens. Then they look horrible. So I'm expecting I'm going to be seeing big improvements over what I have. This phone excels with the types of photos I tend to snap. I'm happy.

I don't really care how much better it is or isn't than some other device. It's the device I want and it will be leaps and bounds better than what's sitting on the desk next to me with its broken screen.
 
Last edited:
Looking at MKBHD and Mrwhosetheboss reviews of the Max, it seems there is a difference but not as dramatic as the numbers suggest.

Still a great Camera regardless!

AutoTrader have shot their entire Aston Martin DBS Volante review on the 12 Pro Max, nice plug by Apple here:

I don't know if it's just me, but I really don't like the color grading in that video. It's way too saturated and I couldn't focus on the actual performance of the iPhone camera. Shame. The stabilization seemed pretty good, but to be fair I'm sure they were using a gimbal for that.
 
Another review http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-12-pro-camera-max-review-zion

maxvs12p.jpg
 
This is a review from a photographer...


This is a comparison with the 12 mini / 12 / 12 Pro...


Basically, there's no night and day noticeable difference between the 12 mini / 12 / 12 Pro and the 12 Pro Max.
Enjoy the phone that best suits your needs, enjoy the camera - they all take great shots for what they are.

But if anyone is going bigger just for the camera, it's not worth it is basically my take from most videos I've watched. I would trust the view of a photographer rather than a "tech reviewer" who will often only have good things to say about Apple so that they keep getting their future review units etc.
You're picking results that help justify your decision. I've seen plenty of examples of images that show the meaningful difference that does exist, and furthermore the real improvement is seen when the Pro Max does not shift to Night Mode as "early" as the rest of the 12 line does, and when it does, takes 1 second exposures where the rest of 12 line takes 3.

Those changes alone are worth the better camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kent viggo
Just to add, I trust Peter McKinnon when it comes to photography. Just says it clearly, he really can’t tell there is that much difference in the 12 pro and pro max. Again I am taking the words from a photographer over tech sites. He knows what he is talking about.

It's obvious that random guy spent like 30 seconds actually taking and comparing photos before throwing together a "review".

Here's a review from a pro photographer who could actually demonstrate he put the Pro Max through it's paces:
http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-12-pro-camera-max-review-zion

Mann's thoughts are basically a combination of other reviewers's: photos same as 12 Pro in most lighting, potentially a lot better in low light, unsure if camera alone justifies dealing with the large size.
 
But thats one review. Others say its not much of an improvement over the pro
Lol. And possibly one of the only accurate reviews, since most of these "reviewers" have no idea how to test the difference. A dope like MKBHD whatever the hell his name is has no idea that the Pro Max switches to Night Mode under much darker conditions than the rest of the 12 line due to the larger sensor, and also captures Night Mode shots much faster, enabling a whole new range of motion during night mode shots that are just blurred streaks with every other iPhone.

But yeah, let's prop up those reviews some more.
 
You're picking results that help justify your decision. I've seen plenty of examples of images that show the meaningful difference that does exist, and furthermore the real improvement is seen when the Pro Max does not shift to Night Mode as "early" as the rest of the 12 line does, and when it does, takes 1 second exposures where the rest of 12 line takes 3.

Those changes alone are worth the better camera.

If you don't care about the size of the phone I will go for the Pro Max 100%. If it's important for you (more portable, one-handed use, etc.) then I will go for the Pro.

Despite the camera improvements it is more important to feel comfortable with the phone. Is better? YES. It is worth it? Depending on your use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnnylarue
Just to add, I trust Peter McKinnon when it comes to photography. Just says it clearly, he really can’t tell there is that much difference in the 12 pro and pro max. Again I am taking the words from a photographer over tech sites. He knows what he is talking about.


I think the main thing is in low light, its going to take less seconds for night mode to kick in

in decent lighting, I would expect the difference to be very little to none - that seems to be the general consensus from a quick skim

I wouldn't get a size you don't want , just for the camera.

Battery life - maybe different story depending on use case but even then... not sure. You might find yourself more annoyed than relieved if thats what's swaying you
 
At first glance, this comparison looks like a good case to go with the 12PM. However, I see a few problems with this comparison. The first is that the PM shot is obviously closer to the cat, which will translate into more detail if you zoom in the same amount, which leads to my second gripe: Why are they zooming into the 12 Pro shot so much more than the 12PM?? Of course the Pro is going to look worse than the PM because of less resolution. My third and final complaint is that the focus looks to be slightly off on the Pro shot. The focus seems to be slightly in front of the cat's face, while the PM shot has its focus nailed spot on. There could also be differences between shutter speed, which exacerbates motion blur, but I'm not sure on that one. This comparison is really just comparing apples to oranges...
 
It's obvious that random guy spent like 30 seconds actually taking and comparing photos before throwing together a "review".

Here's a review from a pro photographer who could actually demonstrate he put the Pro Max through it's paces:
http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-12-pro-camera-max-review-zion

Mann's thoughts are basically a combination of other reviewers's: photos same as 12 Pro in most lighting, potentially a lot better in low light, unsure if camera alone justifies dealing with the large size.
This right here is the only review anyone ever needs to see with regard to the actual, material difference between the Pro and Pro Max camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarArchibald
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.