Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
While I have totally enjoyed the two iMacs I've owned, it is, respectfully, time to move on.

When my current iMac is retired, I will likely go with a mini or studio plus Apple (or other) display. Makes a lot of sense in today's market.

Why you feel the need to be so evangelical about your personal choices is a mystery to me.
Agree with all 3 points!
1. My 2 iMacs, thoroughly used and enjoyed, are now used by others in the family.
2. Having retired them, I moved on to Mac Studio + BenQ 32" 4K, would have mini'd if I did not need more RAM, and so many good monitors on today's market.
3. It really doesn't make sense to not push my personal choices on friends & family, everyone uses tech/cars/homes/tools etc in their own ways with too many considerations for "1 to rule them all".
 
A lot of my friends went the Mac mini + Apple Studio Display route, which as we all know is an utterly foolish thing to do compared to getting an iMac.
'Utterly foolish' comes off as a bit condescending and insulting in tone, and the assertion itself has serious logical holes, as a number of posters have pointed out various ways the Mini+ASD option is superior for some.

-I've let them know that Apple has an amazing trade-in policy where they will put credit towards a new iMac when they turn in their Mac mini & Studio Display
I doubt that trade-in is going to return full original value, and someone accustomed to an ASD may find the 27" iMac screen disappointing by comparison. If the MacMini was a 'Pro' version, they lose Thunderbolt 5 (which not many take good advantage of yet, I imagine, but nice to know it's there). The loss of the ASD spatial audio may lead to purchasing external speakers for some, introducing considerably more clutter than eliminated by the iMac setup using fewer cables otherwise.

I give my friends a test drive of the iMac and show them how much better it is than the mac mini + studio display
You assert your subjective opinion as to which is better as objective fact, when many hold the opposite opinion.

-Utilize Apple's AR feature to show them how much more improved their setup looks with an iMac - less cables, clutter, and colors that make their interior pop
IIRC, you had another thread struggling with the decision of which color iMac to buy. You sound like someone who highly values the aesthetic look of the setup. You're not alone in that; some people make a big deal out of the minimalist industrial design of the Apple Studio Display, that it doesn't look 'plasticy' or flex and creak when they grasp and move it around, while some of us don't care so much when we mostly start at the screen.

Metaphorically, you may have the 'soul of an interior decorator,' but most people don't. Yes, the iMacs looks cute and their color options are a selling point. But if I cared so much about that, Mighty Skins has a large selection of 'skins' for the M4 Mac Mini series that go way beyond a limited range of pastel colors (19 pages of options in my browser).

The M-series Apple iMacs have their niche. They are cute, powerful enough for many people, compact and minimalist with presumably high quality (albeit 24") displays and for aesthetically sensitive users without demanding computing needs looking for a decor-conscious option for a small space, they have a strong use case. They might also appeal to basic users, like if you're choosing a computer for a technically non-savvy relative where complexity is the enemy and simplicity is king.
 
Hey iMac fans.

A lot of my friends went the Mac mini + Apple Studio Display route, which as we all know is an utterly foolish thing to do compared to getting an iMac.
Utterly foolish to try to convince people that what works for you is a fit for everyone else.

Each to their own, but when the Mac Mini first arrived on the scene in 2005 it was a fit for me because I wanted a computer that was easily, occasionally portable (by bicycle or motorcycle) that could be set up with any available monitor..... Which still works for me, now on my third Mac Mini.

I suggest you continue entertaining folks to nice dinner parties, which they will surely enjoy. Show off your shiny new iMac if you must, but haranguing folks on its merits over their own choices is an exercise in futility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hg.wells
It’s just possible the kind of recreational tribalism behind sports rivalries is in play here, good natured rooting for one’s preferred tribe. So…Team iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parowdy
In my opinion, your actions are not what I would consider normal behavior. If I was one of those friends, I would tell you to back off immediately. And if you didn’t, you would no longer be a friend. Your actions are toxic.
Had I written the same comment I’d be suspended or banned.
Glad you said it, spoke my mind.
I’m always up for bashing Microsoft and windows (but also Apple because what’s going on with the software right now). But this behavior towards people that already have a Mac is appalling.
 
Last edited:
Want to be my friend? Give me dem 100 bucks and I swear to buy an iMac. Trust me bro.

But in all honesty, what’s so bad about a Mac mini and a Studio Display? Id prefer that over an iMac.
Should I need more horse power in the future, I don’t have to replace my computer and screen. Just the Mac, while keeping my nice display for the next one, or any other device like a MacBook, console, PC etc.

Unless Apple reintroduces Target Display Mode I think iMacs aren’t worth it anyway.
 
Ever considered going the 1984 commercial route?
Hit them studio displays with a sledgehammer, then they’ll have to accept your iMac..

In all seriousness the iMac really only works these days for a very specific customer, most are better off with either a Mini/Studio or, more likely, a laptop or tablet.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.