... It also suggests to me that some people have an unhealthy level of self importance, to think they are worth anyone's time to spy on.
Settings -> Restrictions -> Canera -> Off.
I can't believe no one replied with a straight answer.
And for the people suggesting duct tape or whatever. Shame on you.
We don't know the original poster's situation, he or she could very well be a "person of interest"; or just paranoid (most likely).
However, after watching the 60 minutes (US television news show) story on the NSA last night we learned that: the NSA has the call records of every call made, by every person, in the USA for the last 5 years. It wouldn't surprise me if they had similar for most other countries in the world. In fact, the call tracking example was showing phone call connections between "Somali pirates."
So while 99.99% of us are not bad people, apparently we are still worth watching to some degree. Is the NSA watching us through our web cams? Doubtful for all but a select few, but that doesn't mean non-government folks aren't trying to do so.
Perhaps the original poster is the victim of an abusive spouse, or stalker. I've known people who we're being stalked online. It is really scary when your computer pops up with a message from the stalker describing what you are wearing and what sites you are browsing.
Maybe the original post was a troll, or maybe someone was just looking for a "safer" way to use the internet.
As far as the NSA collecting my phone call data
Yep.Frankly, people should be more worried about what big business and big banks know about us, because that can have an impact on our lives.
...
Frankly, people should be more worried about what big business and big banks know about us, because that can have an impact on our lives. ...
The difference between government and business is that business doesn't have the authority (yet) to serve a no-knock warrant with armed people busting into your house to take you away. The government does have that authority.
Regardless, we've basically labeled the original poster as crazy or clinically paranoid, but he or she could be trying hide from a determined stalker, rather than a government.
Wow, i am really amazed how paranoiac people are( not mentioning you bro, my all friends doing this except me ) , the thing is actually, i really wonder what you are doing on your computer?
or on iPad. c'mon
![]()
Does a person trying to hide from a abusive husband or wife deserve aor
? What about an activist who protests against an oppressive regime?
This idea that the "government" is using your devices' cameras to secretly record you is just plain crazy. Do I think elements in the government can and are recording data and info on certain people - of course they are. But for the rest of the 99.99% of the population who are about as unimportant as it gets, this type of delusion and fear is something that suggests to me the need for better education. It also suggests to me that some people have an unhealthy level of self importance, to think they are worth anyone's time to spy on.
This article is talking about PCs not iPads. Such a thing is not possible with an iPad. Some of you are watching too much NCIS.
Lol... That's not going to happen on an iPad that hasn't been jail broken. It might happen on a computer though. Either cover it up with tape or wear a paper bag over your head every time you use it.
On your computer yes, but unless your ipad is jail broken, it's not possible to remotely access the webcam.
It has nothing to do with trust, it just is not technically possible, unless your going to claim that the government has a secret mole inside Apple that has placed a back door into IOS that allows then to take control of your ipad.
Care to share your proof?
iOS is more locked down then OS X, so just because something has been done to MacBooks, doesn't automatically mean it can be done to iPads.
What part of that or any other information like that deals with iOS again?
It can also be said that believing something that hasn't been shown to be true can be naive as well.
Well now, that certainly makes for a very strong and grounded argument.![]()
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/12/30/nsa-was-able-to-capture-live-data-from-compromised-iphones-in-2008-including-live-camera-gps-and-more/
I knew exactly what I was talking about. Like I said, don't be so naive all your life.
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/12/30/nsa-was-able-to-capture-live-data-from-compromised-iphones-in-2008-including-live-camera-gps-and-more/
I knew exactly what I was talking about. Like I said, don't be so naive all your life.
So all that proves is that the NSA could install software on devices it had physical access to, which anyone can do even today. That is very different from someone remotely installing software without the user's permission. The article only said it was possible the NSA had improved its software so remote installation would be possible, not that it had ever successfully done so. As the article also said, it's likely those doors were closed by Apple. Therefore, the article proves nothing at all.The NSA in 2008 claimed a 100 percent success rate in installing the software on phones it had physical access to, and it's possible that the spy agency has improved its software so it can be installed remotely or via some sort of social engineering, something that was specifically mentioned in the documents. It's also possible that Apple has closed the security holes the NSA was using, making it more difficult to compromise iOS devices in this manner.
So all that proves is that the NSA could install software on devices it had physical access to, which anyone can do even today. That is very different from someone remotely installing software without the user's permission. The article only said it was possible the NSA had improved its software so remote installation would be possible, not that it had ever successfully done so. As the article also said, it's likely those doors were closed by Apple. Therefore, the article proves nothing at all.
Are you running from the law or something? I don't think they're talking about iOS devices. Even if they are, I wouldn't give a **** since I'm not a criminal.
Wow, i am really amazed how paranoiac people are( not mentioning you bro, my all friends doing this except me ) , the thing is actually, i really wonder what you are doing on your computer?
or on iPad. c'mon
![]()
For the 3rd gen iPad, how can I disable the webcam so it can't be turned on at all? I read news articles today about people that can activate your webcam remotely without the webcam light turning on and this makes me a little paranoid, so I'd like to disable the webcam altogether since I rarely use the webcam on the iPad (in fact, I don't think I've ever used it once since I've gotten it).
Anyway, that compromise was 5 years ago. Read through the article and watch the 45 minute video by Appelbaum. If for some reason you still believe that the NSA can't hack an iPhone/ipad whenever it wants on whomever it wants, then I feel sorry for you.
And for the people suggesting duct tape or whatever. Shame on you.
I think you should read it before you attempt to dismiss my point. It says iPhones. iPhones are iOS devices. No one has to be a criminal to be angered at this breach of privacy. Since you don't I'm sure you wouldn't mind someone gaining access to your device and watching you get dressed or listening in on private conversations.Are you running from the law or something? I don't think they're talking about iOS devices. Even if they are, I wouldn't give a **** since I'm not a criminal.
You read news articles, but you were careless.
1. This doesn't affect iPads. It affects certain MacBook models from around 2008. It is very, very unlikely that iPads use the same webcam as 2008 MacBook models.
2. They cannot start the webcam without the light turning on. They can only permanently disable the webcam light, so if you fear this happened to your Mac, just start Facetime or Photobooth and check if the light is on.
3. They cannot just do this; they have to find a way to hack into your computer first. The first step to doing this is to make you run an app that isn't sandboxed. Can't do that on an iPad.
All that said, tiny bit of opaque sticky tape does the job just nicely.
----------
I feel sorrier for you if you believe it. Before the last jail break, nobody but Apple was capable of reading data on a passcode locked iPhone; that may still be true today and it will be true again when 7.1 is released which will remove whatever exploit they used. There is no jailbreak possible without having the phone physically in your hands. Reading data is not possible without having the phone, and it is impossible if you have a random 10 digit passcode - Apple designed the encryption so that decryption must be done by the phone itself, no array of supercomputers can help. And any decryption attempt takes about 1/10th of a second, so a four digit passcode takes 1000 seconds to break, 7 digits takes a million seconds or 12 days, 10 digits takes a billion seconds or 30 years.
Please explain why. It is a very cheap solution, very easy to apply by anybody without the slightest bit of knowledge about technology, it is very easily verified, and it works 100%.
A very small piece of electrical tape ought to do the trick...
How do you know the NSA have not found their own exploits? Don't forget that they have many more resources available than the jailbreak community and probably pay hundreds of people to work fulltime on such things. The recent revelations show that they are not interested in helping companies fix security holes. They intentionally keep them for themselves so they can exploit them (and of course that also leaves the holes open for other blackhats who find them).I feel sorrier for you if you believe it. Before the last jail break, nobody but Apple was capable of reading data on a passcode locked iPhone; that may still be true today and it will be true again when 7.1 is released which will remove whatever exploit they used.
Remember Jailbreakme? If the NSA has found a browser-based exploit, they have the infrastructure in place to redirect any browser to their exploit site without the user knowing it (google for "Quantum Insert" if you want to know more).There is no jailbreak possible without having the phone physically in your hands.
I think you should read it before you attempt to dismiss my point. It says iPhones. iPhones are iOS devices. No one has to be a criminal to be angered at this breach of privacy. Since you don't I'm sure you wouldn't mind someone gaining access to your device and watching you get dressed or listening in on private conversations.
----------
I feel sorry for you if you feel they don't have the power to do this. iOS devices aren't out of the NSA's reach.
LOL You changed the link at the last second, but okay.
I recently downloaded and installed an app on my iPhone 4S that can capture photos - and videos - from the iPhone's camera. In fact, such an app comes pre-installed on iOS. So no, the fact that the NSA did this 5 years ago means nothing.By your own admission the article proves that the NSA had the ability to install software that could capture web cam photos on an iPhone in 2008. So to say there is proof and at the same time it proves nothing?
They didn't hack an iPhone. They simply installed an app on an iPhone that they had physical access to. iPhone users do this millions and millions of times per day.Anyway, that compromise was 5 years ago. Read through the article and watch the 45 minute video by Appelbaum. If for some reason you still believe that the NSA can't hack an iPhone/ipad whenever it wants on whomever it wants, then I feel sorry for you. .
Nothing is impossible, but the fact is that it has not been done.We started this thread with fanboys saying that it was impossible to hack an iOS device.
You really need to read what has been published. Here is a quote from the NSA document detailing "DROPOUTJEEP":I recently downloaded and installed an app on my iPhone 4S that can capture photos - and videos - from the iPhone's camera. In fact, such an app comes pre-installed on iOS. So no, the fact that the NSA did this 5 years ago means nothing.
They didn't hack an iPhone. They simply installed an app on an iPhone that they had physical access to. iPhone users do this millions and millions of times per day.
(TS//SI//REL) DROPOUTJEEP is a software implant for the Apple iPhone that utilizes modular mission applications to provide specific SIGINT functionality. This functionality includes the ability to remotely push/pull files from the device, SMS retrieval, contact list retrieval, voicemail, geolocation, hot mic, camera capture, cell tower location, etc. Command, control, and data exfiltration can occur over SMS messaging or a GPRS data connection. All communications with the implant will be covert and encrypted.
(TS//SI//REL) The initial release of DROPOUTJEEP will focus on installing the implant via close access methods. A remote installation capability will be pursued for a future release.