No it isn't
I was thinking the same.
No one is acting like they were forced to sign anything. But when I sign up for phone service and can't even receive a phone call in my own home because the service is THAT bad, you better believe I will take advantage of a $0.05 increase to get out of my contract. No one should be forced to pay $$$$ for subpar service. Obviously people want to get out of contracts early because they are unhappy with their service. Perhaps if these companies focused more on customer service and providing adequate coverage, people wouldn't be dying to get out of their contracts. Other people getting out of their contract early w/o penalty doesn't affect you at all. I suggest you direct your frustration towards things that are actually worth moaning about.
To be fair, there's some truth to what was said.
Trying to weasel your way out of a contract (one which provided you with a discounted phone; which was entered knowingly) based on a trivial/inconsequential difference in a fee is unethical/dishonest. I couldn't care less if people try to do it—good luck to ’em—but people should at least be honest with themselves about the choices they're making.
Likewise...Come now, here I was thinking you were smarter than this.
Not really
There is nothing wrong with breaking a contract if it allows for it. Far from being "illicit/illegal" as ATT would have to honor it if indeed the contract was terminated (ie both parties acted so it can never ever be illegal...)
Now weather canceling a contract based off a 5 cent change is ethical, that is another question and lies with the person. However, if a 5 cent change allows for canceling a contract, then I am 100% ok with it.
However, I do not careto companies as they always try to take advantage of the consumer in most cases and look out for their bottom line. For instance, ATT charges the same plan rates for unsubsidized phones as subsidized (which the plans are supposed to be making up the cost). Why should a customer not be entitled to act in their best interest as long as the contract allows for it?
In summary, I have no idea why jav6454 thinks it's illicit nor cares what other people are legally able to do.
The. Why did you sign a contract you are not willing to hold up to? Your word is now worthless to me and anyone else.
If you sign a contract for a service you want it to be held as best as possible. If you knew service was not going to be good, then why on Earth did you sign? Was someone forcing you? Was there a gun to your head? Now then, don't use weasle like excuses to break a contract you knowingly entered.
Why I think so? Because the terms explicitly say you can't use that specific charge to get out of contract. Just because a few lucky souls have doesn't make it so.
No one is acting like they were forced to sign anything. But when I sign up for phone service and can't even receive a phone call in my own home because the service is THAT bad, you better believe I will take advantage of a $0.05 increase to get out of my contract. No one should be forced to pay $$$$ for subpar service. Obviously people want to get out of contracts early because they are unhappy with their service. Perhaps if these companies focused more on customer service and providing adequate coverage, people wouldn't be dying to get out of their contracts. Other people getting out of their contract early w/o penalty doesn't affect you at all. I suggest you direct your frustration towards things that are actually worth moaning about.
Exactly. It's legal and in the contract. Some people here just don't get it and are overthinking this entirely or reading the T&C incorrectly. If the Fed Uni charge goes UP, you get out FREE. Couldn't be anymore clear. My sister is on the phone now with ATT to cancel, I'll let you know what happens.
Exactly. It's legal and in the contract. Some people here just don't get it and are overthinking this entirely or reading the T&C incorrectly. If the Fed Uni charge goes UP, you get out FREE. Couldn't be anymore clear. My sister is on the phone now with ATT to cancel, I'll let you know what happens.
I haven't read the full thread.
If it (being the contract) states that you can't use the method in the op and people are just catching reps off guard, then I do not agree with it
However, it is not illegal (as both parties would have had to agreed to cancel it). Unethical, yes
Three posters posted here the Terms of Agreement paragraph in question. All of them agree the charge OP is tying to exploit is excluded and can't be used as an excuse. OP however keeps on being delusional despite having been proven WRONG over and over.
You know, I'm skeptical that it actually works.
But for those who are actually *serious* about wanting to leave, is it not worth a try anyways? Worse that happens is you still have to pay the fee, or you stay with AT&T because you can't get out of it and don't want to pay the fee. Basically, worse that happens is you are back to square one.
So I think it's probably worth trying for anyone who seriously does want to leave.
But, I would mention I am betting AT&T won't let you back on at least for a set amount of time. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere recently they do tend to blacklist people for leaving mid contract at least for a certain period of time. So, I'd be certain you want to leave AT&T (personally I'd not do it if it meant a permaban unless I had something against AT&T on principle, like they ripped me off and I'm never giving them another dime, not over bad connection cause maybe one day they'll have the better connection or maybe one day the company you are with will do something horrid to you and AT&T might be one of the reasonable other choices. You never know).
I am not trying it though cause I have no motivation to leave *shrug*.
OK, so then stay with them. No one is forcing you to leave ATT for Verizon.
Phone rep says she has no idea what this fee is (surprise, surprise). Waiting to be transferred to supervisor. BTW, my sister's FUC went up $0.08 in Dec. Went up 8 times in 2010. And my sister wants to get out because she cannot make/receive any calls in her new apartment building. She's had ATT for 14 months.
Another question. Does the iphone still require a mandatory 2yr contract, even if one has completed their entire initial contract?
Wait a second - a few pages ago you boasted that you were able to cancel the contracts of friends and family too. Unless you all live together it sounds as if you're justifying yourself with any reason that comes to mind.Not necessarily true. I needed the $0.05 "loophole" because although the service sucked and I had no ability to place/receive calls, the area in which I moved was on their coverage map and therefore they told me the service WAS sufficient. I wouldn't have been able to get out otherwise.